BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 253(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai320Indore240Chennai220Delhi218Kolkata165Karnataka139Ahmedabad130Jaipur121Bangalore115Surat103Chandigarh93Lucknow69Pune61Raipur47Panaji43Hyderabad41Nagpur39Cuttack38Rajkot33Patna28Allahabad27Cochin26Varanasi19Guwahati14Amritsar12Visakhapatnam10Ranchi9Jodhpur8Jabalpur8Agra8SC4Telangana2Rajasthan1Dehradun1Calcutta1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 250(6)21Section 253(3)8Condonation of Delay8Section 1474Section 44A4Addition to Income4Section 271B3Section 2712Section 144

NAFEES ALI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 192/JAB/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2019-20
Section 144BSection 147Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 69C

condoned the delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) and restored the issue to the file of the CIT(A) for a fresh order, ensuring an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and adherence to Section 250(6) of the IT Act.", "result": "Partly Allowed", "sections": [ "253

VICKY NAVANI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), JABALPUR, WARD )), JABALPUR

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

2
Section 115B2
ITA 124/JAB/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 253(3)Section 271Section 271BSection 273BSection 275Section 44A

253(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”, for short). The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

MANISH KUMAR AGRAWAL,KATNI vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD-1, KATNI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 106/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 69A

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s I.T.A. No.106/JAB/2024 Assessment Year

SAURABH JAIN,SAGAR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE,, SAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 42/JAB/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 147Section 250(6)Section 253(3)

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s I.T.A. No.42/JAB/2025 Assessment Year

PRABHAT SUPA,CHHATARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , CHHATARPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 138/JAB/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 147Section 250(6)Section 253(3)

section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has I.T.A. No.138/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2011-12 2 requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express

DAYA RAM YADAV,MANDLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 71/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 69A

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental I.T.A. No.71/JAB/2025 Assessment Year:2017-18 2 Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

RISHABH KUMAR JAIN,KATNI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 120/JAB/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 69

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental I.T.A. No.120/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2016-17 2 Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

SHREE JEE EDUCATIONAL TRUST,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXCEMPTION, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 191/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143Section 250(6)Section 253(3)

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the I.T.A. No.191/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2018-19 2 delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection