BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

23 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 253(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai329Indore241Chennai222Delhi220Kolkata169Ahmedabad141Karnataka139Jaipur126Bangalore116Surat107Lucknow105Chandigarh96Pune64Raipur47Panaji43Nagpur42Hyderabad41Cuttack38Rajkot34Allahabad33Patna28Cochin26Jabalpur23Varanasi20Visakhapatnam14Guwahati14Jodhpur14Amritsar12Ranchi9Agra8SC4Telangana2Dehradun1Andhra Pradesh1Calcutta1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Condonation of Delay23Section 253(3)21Section 250(6)21Section 14713Addition to Income10Section 1449Penalty6Limitation/Time-bar6Section 44A

VICKY NAVANI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), JABALPUR, WARD )), JABALPUR

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 124/JAB/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 253(3)Section 271Section 271BSection 273BSection 275Section 44A

253(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”, for short). The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

Showing 1–20 of 23 · Page 1 of 2

5
Section 271(1)(c)4
Section 271B4
Section 119(2)(b)4

NAFEES ALI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 192/JAB/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2019-20
Section 144BSection 147Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 69C

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee's application for condonation

ANIL KUMAR GUPTA,REWA vs. ITO- WARD-1, REWA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 160/JAB/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 147Section 249(2)Section 249(3)Section 253(3)Section 56(2)(vii)

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has I.T.A. No.160/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2014-15 2 requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

BASANT LAL GUPTA,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, , REWA

In the result, ITA. No. 129/JAB/2024 & ITA

ITA 129/JAB/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur06 Mar 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 147Section 253(3)Section 271(1)(c)

section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted applications for condonation of delay in filing of these appeals, pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeals for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s application for condonation

BASANT LAL GUPTA,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 , REWA

In the result, ITA. No. 129/JAB/2024 & ITA

ITA 132/JAB/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur06 Mar 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 147Section 253(3)Section 271(1)(c)

section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted applications for condonation of delay in filing of these appeals, pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeals for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s application for condonation

BASANT LAL GUPTA,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 , REWA

In the result, ITA. No. 129/JAB/2024 & ITA

ITA 130/JAB/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur06 Mar 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 147Section 253(3)Section 271(1)(c)

section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted applications for condonation of delay in filing of these appeals, pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeals for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s application for condonation

BASANT LAL GUPTA,SIDHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 , REWA

In the result, ITA. No. 129/JAB/2024 & ITA

ITA 131/JAB/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur06 Mar 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 147Section 253(3)Section 271(1)(c)

section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted applications for condonation of delay in filing of these appeals, pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeals for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s application for condonation

SAURABH JAIN,SAGAR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE,, SAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 42/JAB/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 147Section 250(6)Section 253(3)

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s I.T.A. No.42/JAB/2025 Assessment Year

PRABHAT SUPA,CHHATARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , CHHATARPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 138/JAB/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 147Section 250(6)Section 253(3)

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has I.T.A. No.138/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2011-12 2 requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

RISHABH KUMAR JAIN,KATNI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 120/JAB/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 69

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental I.T.A. No.120/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2016-17 2 Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

GIRISH KURARIYA,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 68/JAB/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 253(3)

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental I.T.A. No.68/JAB/2025 Assessment Year:2010-11 2 Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

DEEPAK KUMAR LALWANI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, KATNI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 77/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur02 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 253(3)Section 69A

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental I.T.A. No.77/JAB/2025 Assessment Year:2017-18 2 Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

MAHESH CHAURASIYA,WARD NO vs. ITO, TIKAMGARH

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 15/JAB/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 253(3)

section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental I.T.A. No.15/JAB/2025 Assessment Year:2014-15 2 Representative for Revenue did not express

DAYA RAM YADAV,MANDLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 71/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 69A

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental I.T.A. No.71/JAB/2025 Assessment Year:2017-18 2 Representative for Revenue did not express any objection

AYODHYA PRASAD DWIVEDI,SIDHI vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD 2, , REWA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 98/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 253(3)

section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental I.T.A. No.98/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2017-18 2 Representative for Revenue did not express

MANISH KUMAR AGRAWAL,KATNI vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER WARD-1, KATNI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 106/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 253(3)Section 69A

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s I.T.A. No.106/JAB/2024 Assessment Year

SHRI SADGURU MAHILA BAHUODESHIYA SAMITI MARYADIT JANKIKUND CHITRAKOOT,CHITRAKOOT, SATNA vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 52/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 253(3)Section 271BSection 44A

section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental I.T.A. No.52/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2017-18 2 Representative for Revenue did not express

URMILA KURARIYA (L/H OF LATE SHRI GANGA PRASAD KURARIYA),JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 69/JAB/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Sept 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 253(3)

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s application for condonation

KRISHNA KUMAR GUPTA,BALAGHAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BALAGHAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 73/JAB/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 144Section 147Section 253(3)

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection to assessee’s application for condonation

SHREE JEE EDUCATIONAL TRUST,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXCEMPTION, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 191/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143Section 250(6)Section 253(3)

253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal pleading that the I.T.A. No.191/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2018-19 2 delay was unintentional and beyond the control of the assessee and has requested to admit the appeal for hearing. The learned Sr. Departmental Representative for Revenue did not express any objection