VICKY NAVANI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), JABALPUR, WARD )), JABALPUR

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

d with a further report by an Accountant in prescribed form, and also failed to prove that there existed any reasonable cause for such failure, order of penalty under section 27IB was justified-Held, yes [Paras 6 and 9][In favour of revenue]" As the facts of this case are exactly like one quoted above wherein it has been held

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, passed on 26.07.2024, rejecting the appeal of the assessee against the orders of the ld. AO passed under section 144 of the Income

NAGENDRA PRATAP SINGH,SINGRAULI vs. ITO, SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2017-18 Nagendra Pratap Singh V. Income Tax Officer Prop. M/S. Prem Kanta Indane, Itd, Singrauli-486788 Old Dudhichua Road, Singrauli- 486788. Tan/Pan:Asaps8528D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Shri N. M. Prasad, Sr. Cit(Dr-1) Date Of Hearing: 20 08 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 08 2025 O R D E R

1,06,00,040/- on account of estimated income of the appellant and the learned CIT Appeals NFAC confirming the addition, without going in to the merits of the case. 8. That the above grounds are independent to each other.” 2. At the time of hearing of appeal none was present on behalf of the assessee. It is noted that

DINESH JAT,SAGAR vs. CIT (A), SAGAR

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 23.10.2024 and 18.03.2025, dismissing the appeals of the assessee against the assessment order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 on 17.09.2021 and the penalty

DINESH JAT,SAGAR vs. CIT(A), NFAC

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 23.10.2024 and 18.03.2025, dismissing the appeals of the assessee against the assessment order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 on 17.09.2021 and the penalty

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, all four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. These four appeals have been filed against the various orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC dismissing its appeals against orders passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 and orders passed dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee against

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, all four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. These four appeals have been filed against the various orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC dismissing its appeals against orders passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 and orders passed dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee against

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, all four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. These four appeals have been filed against the various orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC dismissing its appeals against orders passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 and orders passed dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee against

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, all four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. These four appeals have been filed against the various orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC dismissing its appeals against orders passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 and orders passed dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee against

JAGDISH PRASAD AGRAWAL,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, SEONI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. Both the appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 23.05.2023 for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18, wherein the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed both appeals for statistical purposes. As both

JAGDISH PRASAD AGRAWAL,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, SEONI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. Both the appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 23.05.2023 for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18, wherein the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed both appeals for statistical purposes. As both

RAJEEV MISHRA,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, SEONI, SEONI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

D E R PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC dated 18.11.2022 under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dismissing the appeal of the assessee against the order of the ITO, Ward, Seoni under section 143(3) of the Act dated 28.02.2014. The grounds

SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL,KOTMA vs. ACIT,CIRCLE,KATNI, KATNI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

D E R Per Sanjay Arora, AM This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order by the National Faceless Appeal Centre-NFAC (‘CIT(A)’ for short), dated 29/10/2021, dismissing the assessee’s appeal contesting his assessment under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’, hereinafter) dated 04/12/2018 for Assessment Year

CHHAYA MASURKAR,BALAGHAT vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER JURISDICTION OFFICER- ITO, BALAGHAT, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshrachhaya Masurkar V. National Faceless 1 Ward No.9 Ram Mandir Road, Assessment Centre Katangi, Madhya Pradesh- Jurisdiction Officer-Ito, 481445. Balaghat Delhi. Tan/Pan:Cakpm8662A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Vijay Bagrecha, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. Cit(Dr) O R D E R (1). The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Impugned Order Dated 13.02.2024 Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) (Hereinafter Referred As To “Cit(A)”)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Pertaining To The Assessment Year 2013-14. The Grounds Of Appeal Of The Assessee Are As Under: -

D E R (1). The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 13.02.2024 order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (hereinafter referred as to “CIT(A)”)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, pertaining to the assessment year 2013-14. The grounds of appeal of the assessee are as under: - “1

CHIEF MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICE ANNUPPUR,ANNUPPUR vs. ITO-TDS-2,JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleita No. 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 & 89/Jab/2023 (A.Y: 2014-15 To 2019-20) Chief Medical & Vs. Ito, Tds-2, Health Office, Room No. 102, Aayakar Amarkant Road, Bhawan, Napier Town, Annuppur-484224, Jabalpur-482001, Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh.

D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: These are the six appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)/CIT (A) Delhi passed U/Sec 201(1) & Sec 201(1A) and 250 of the Act. 2. At the time of hearing, the Ld.AR of the assessee submitted that there is a delay