Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10(26)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 270A8 Section 69A8 Section 115B8 Condonation of Delay5 Section 1474 Section 271A4 Section 564 Cash Deposit4 Penalty

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, all four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 97/JAB/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Hemant S. Modh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR & Sh. Shrawan Kumar

Section 115BSection 147Section 270ASection 271ASection 56Section 69A

condoned. The ld. CIT(A) observed that the FIR that have been filed by the assessee in support of its contention was dated 1.12.2019 but the appeal as per Form No. 35 was to be filed by December, 2024. Therefore, the FIR did not explain the delay in the filing appeal since it reported the incident of more than five

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

SEHKARI VIPDAN SAMITI MARYADIT,NARSINGHPUR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

GAURAV SINGH,SATNA vs. ITO-WARD SATNA, SATNA