RAMJIDAS BUDHRAJA CHARITABLE TRUST (SGM),CHHINDWARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Charitable Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Trust Exemption Pandurna, Chhindwara (MP)- Jabalpur (MP)-482001. 480334. PAN:AAATR8939D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri G. N. Purohit, Advocate Respondent by Shri Rahul Padha, JC-2 O R D E R PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA: A.M. (A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.235/JBP/2025 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year

MANNULAL JAGANNATH DAS TRUST HOSPITAL,JABALPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (E), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: S/Shri Nrs Ganesan & Sanjay Arora

Trust v. CIT (Exemptions) borrowing made, for charitable purpose/es, that is exempt u/s. 11. However, as also argued without prejudice (para 2.3(b)), how is the generation of surplus violative of the conditions of s. 80G(5)((i) to (v)? It is rather only when there is a surplus (or income by definition) that it could be applied

SHRI NAMIYUN PARSWANATH JAIN, SWETAMBER MANIDHARI TRUST,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION), JABALPUR

In the result, impugned order is set aside and appeal by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes”

charitable trust registered under section 12AA of the Act and has been purportedly enjoying the benefits of section 11 since 2011. In the impugned assessment year the benefit of exemption under section 11 of the Act has been denied to the assessee for the reason that assessee has failed to furnish audit report along with return of income. The contention

DIVYA JYOTI SHIKSHA SAMITI,SAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). The CIT(E) vide order dated 28-02-2019 rejected the said application. 1 | P a g e Divya Jyoti Shiksha Samiti v. CIT (Exemptions) 2.2 The principal ground cited by the ld. CIT(E) for the said rejection is that the society is generating huge surpluses