BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 148clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka455Delhi281Mumbai280Chennai133Bangalore122Hyderabad76Ahmedabad69Jaipur64Pune61Kolkata49Cochin48Chandigarh46Lucknow31Allahabad31Amritsar19Cuttack17Calcutta16Visakhapatnam15Indore15Agra14Guwahati7Patna7Jodhpur6Nagpur6Raipur6Rajkot6Telangana6Varanasi6SC4Surat4Dehradun3Jabalpur3Kerala3Rajasthan2Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2

Key Topics

Section 4014Section 107Section 43B6Section 1485Section 1544Section 1474Section 143(3)3Deduction3Addition to Income3Disallowance

RAMJIDAS BUDHRAJA CHARITABLE TRUST (SGM),CHHINDWARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER EXEMPTION, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 235/JAB/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 10Section 11Section 11(2)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Charitable Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Trust Exemption Pandurna, Chhindwara (MP)- Jabalpur (MP)-482001. 480334. PAN:AAATR8939D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri G. N. Purohit, Advocate Respondent by Shri Rahul Padha, JC-2 O R D E R PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA: A.M. (A) This appeal vide I.T.A. No.235/JBP/2025 has been filed by the assessee for assessment year

2
Rectification u/s 1542

KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI,NARSINGPUR vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 148/JAB/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur06 Mar 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 154Section 40Section 43B

Section 43B of the Act clearly provides that any expense which is claimed and not paid before the date of furnishing the return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act is not to be allowed as expense. Therefore it is held that the AO correctly made addition of Rs.53,328/- on account of disallowance

KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI ,NARSINGPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 149/JAB/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur06 Mar 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 10Section 143(3)Section 154Section 40Section 43B

Section 43B of the Act clearly provides that any expense which is claimed and not paid before the date of furnishing the return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act is not to be allowed as expense. Therefore it is held that the AO correctly made addition of Rs.53,328/- on account of disallowance