Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 44clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,818 Delhi1,757 Bangalore953 Chennai595 Kolkata357 Hyderabad221 Ahmedabad215 Indore186 Jaipur166 Cochin161 Chandigarh151 Karnataka150 Raipur110 Pune87 Surat53 Lucknow52 Visakhapatnam51 Cuttack41 Rajkot39 Guwahati28 Nagpur27 Patna24 Ranchi23 Agra18 Dehradun17 Jodhpur17 Telangana17 Amritsar15 Kerala7 SC7 Himachal Pradesh6 Jabalpur6 Panaji5 Varanasi4 Uttarakhand3 Rajasthan2 Calcutta1 J&K1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)16 Section 2507 Section 2014 TDS4 Section 143(2)3 Section 1443 Deduction3 Section 133A2 Section 1952 Addition to Income

JAGANNATH DAS PREMVATI WELFARE SOCIETY,JABALPUR vs. ITO TDS-1, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 91/JAB/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR

Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS default for the F.Y. 2012-13 of Rs.3,44,266/- along with interest of Rs.1,17,050/-, under sections

JAGANNATH DAS PREMVATI WELFARE SOCIETY,WRIGHT TOWN vs. ITO TDS-1, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 89/JAB/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed

2

ITAT Jabalpur

28 Aug 2025

AY 2011-12

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR

Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS default for the F.Y. 2012-13 of Rs.3,44,266/- along with interest of Rs.1,17,050/-, under sections

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 34/JAB/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS arises. The Assessing Officer also held that in the case of composite contract, the assessee was required to make application under section 195(2) of the Act for determination of the appropriate portion of income of nonresident chargeable to tax in India and make deduction of tax at source accordingly, but the assessee failed in doing so. The Assessing

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 35/JAB/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS arises. The Assessing Officer also held that in the case of composite contract, the assessee was required to make application under section 195(2) of the Act for determination of the appropriate portion of income of nonresident chargeable to tax in India and make deduction of tax at source accordingly, but the assessee failed in doing so. The Assessing

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 194CSection 234BSection 234DSection 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 40

section 270A. Furthermore, the ld. AO also observed that the assessee had debited sub let for wages of Rs.1,60,44,830/- but not deducted tax on the sub let for wages, which violated the TDS

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. CHETANAYA PROMOTERS AND DEVLOPERS,, JABALPUR

In the result, on this ground, appeal of the Revenue as well as appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 133/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR

Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 292BSection 43C

section 133A of the IT Act 1961 in the instant year, books were examined, stocks were valued with coordination of the assessee 4 Co No. 09/JAB/2018 Chetanaya Promoter & Developers and some discrepancies were noticed. Statement recorded during survey proceedings dated 18.10.2014 and bifurcation of the surrender amount is as follows:- S.No Question no Particulars Amount 1 8 Undisclosed cash Rs.895000