BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

50 results for “TDS”+ Section 201(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,552Delhi1,530Bangalore1,096Chennai646Kolkata462Indore368Pune285Ahmedabad285Karnataka257Jaipur223Cochin203Raipur177Hyderabad175Nagpur155Chandigarh127Cuttack88Surat63Visakhapatnam63Lucknow59Jodhpur56Rajkot56Jabalpur50Ranchi40Panaji36Telangana27Amritsar25Agra25Dehradun24Allahabad18Patna17SC13Kerala11Guwahati10Varanasi8Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan3Orissa3J&K1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

TDS49Section 201(1)37Section 200A33Section 234E33Section 271C20Section 27120Section 20118Deduction18Section 194J12Addition to Income

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 35/JAB/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ( in ITA Nos.34 & 35/Jab/2014 DCIT vs Orient Paper Mills short “the Act”) for non-deduction of tax at source on payment made to Italian company for supply of manufacturing plant of tissue paper. The issue-in-dispute involved in both these appeals being common, both these appeals were

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 50 · Page 1 of 3

11
Section 19510
Penalty8
ITA 34/JAB/2014[2008-09]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jabalpur
20 Sept 2023
AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ( in ITA Nos.34 & 35/Jab/2014 DCIT vs Orient Paper Mills short “the Act”) for non-deduction of tax at source on payment made to Italian company for supply of manufacturing plant of tissue paper. The issue-in-dispute involved in both these appeals being common, both these appeals were

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 102/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section 201(1)/201(1A) has been cancelled hence the other grounds of the appeal on merit are not decided.” 5. Before us, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that since the order u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act has already been cancelled and therefore, the penalty levied u/s 271C of the Act also cannot survive

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 99/JAB/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section 201(1)/201(1A) has been cancelled hence the other grounds of the appeal on merit are not decided.” 5. Before us, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that since the order u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act has already been cancelled and therefore, the penalty levied u/s 271C of the Act also cannot survive

MANESSH SHARMA ,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 103/JAB/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section 201(1)/201(1A) has been cancelled hence the other grounds of the appeal on merit are not decided.” 5. Before us, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that since the order u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act has already been cancelled and therefore, the penalty levied u/s 271C of the Act also cannot survive

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 100/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section 201(1)/201(1A) has been cancelled hence the other grounds of the appeal on merit are not decided.” 5. Before us, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that since the order u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act has already been cancelled and therefore, the penalty levied u/s 271C of the Act also cannot survive

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 101/JAB/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section 201(1)/201(1A) has been cancelled hence the other grounds of the appeal on merit are not decided.” 5. Before us, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that since the order u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act has already been cancelled and therefore, the penalty levied u/s 271C of the Act also cannot survive

JAGANNATH DAS PREMVATI WELFARE SOCIETY,WRIGHT TOWN vs. ITO TDS-1, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 89/JAB/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR
Section 201(1)Section 250

2. The facts of the case are that the assessee is an Educational Society and is engaged in the business of School Education. The ld. AO, TDS observed that the assessee had incurred various expenditures and not deducted tax at source with respect to the payments made to various parties as under:- F.Y. Name of the Amount TDS TDS

JAGANNATH DAS PREMVATI WELFARE SOCIETY,JABALPUR vs. ITO TDS-1, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 91/JAB/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR
Section 201(1)Section 250

2. The facts of the case are that the assessee is an Educational Society and is engaged in the business of School Education. The ld. AO, TDS observed that the assessee had incurred various expenditures and not deducted tax at source with respect to the payments made to various parties as under:- F.Y. Name of the Amount TDS TDS

POORAN LAL VISHWAKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 87/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

2 | P a g e ITA Nos.87-89/JAB/2019 (AYs: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Pooran Lal Vishwakarma & other v. ACIT Section 234E was introduced in the year 2012 at that time Section 200A that was not amended. Subsequently the Parliament Finance Act, 2015 introduced sub clause-c 200A. Since the Gujarat High Court found that Section 200A(c) is a missionary provision

SHRI SHANKARLAL VISHWKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAB

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 89/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

2 | P a g e ITA Nos.87-89/JAB/2019 (AYs: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Pooran Lal Vishwakarma & other v. ACIT Section 234E was introduced in the year 2012 at that time Section 200A that was not amended. Subsequently the Parliament Finance Act, 2015 introduced sub clause-c 200A. Since the Gujarat High Court found that Section 200A(c) is a missionary provision

SHRI SHANKARLAL VISHWKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAB

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 88/JAB/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

2 | P a g e ITA Nos.87-89/JAB/2019 (AYs: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Pooran Lal Vishwakarma & other v. ACIT Section 234E was introduced in the year 2012 at that time Section 200A that was not amended. Subsequently the Parliament Finance Act, 2015 introduced sub clause-c 200A. Since the Gujarat High Court found that Section 200A(c) is a missionary provision

SKYLINE AGRO PVT. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1,

In the result, the captioned appeals are dismissed as not maintainable

ITA 236/JAB/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur02 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Sh. Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble

Section 5(2)Section 6

TDS)-1 vs. Jabalpur (M.P) 191, Kotwali Ward, Jabalpur (M.P.) [PAN: AAGCS 4835G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Rahul Bardia, FCA Respondent by Sh. M. Dayasagar, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 02/02/2022 Date of pronouncement 02/02/2022 ORDER Per Bench This is a set of three appeals by the Assessee-company, agitating its’ assessments under sections 201 and 201

SKYLINE AGRO PVT. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1,

In the result, the captioned appeals are dismissed as not maintainable

ITA 237/JAB/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur02 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Sh. Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble

Section 5(2)Section 6

TDS)-1 vs. Jabalpur (M.P) 191, Kotwali Ward, Jabalpur (M.P.) [PAN: AAGCS 4835G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Rahul Bardia, FCA Respondent by Sh. M. Dayasagar, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 02/02/2022 Date of pronouncement 02/02/2022 ORDER Per Bench This is a set of three appeals by the Assessee-company, agitating its’ assessments under sections 201 and 201

SKYLINE AGRO PVT. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1,

In the result, the captioned appeals are dismissed as not maintainable

ITA 235/JAB/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur02 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Sh. Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble

Section 5(2)Section 6

TDS)-1 vs. Jabalpur (M.P) 191, Kotwali Ward, Jabalpur (M.P.) [PAN: AAGCS 4835G] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Rahul Bardia, FCA Respondent by Sh. M. Dayasagar, CIT(DR) Date of hearing 02/02/2022 Date of pronouncement 02/02/2022 ORDER Per Bench This is a set of three appeals by the Assessee-company, agitating its’ assessments under sections 201 and 201

J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. vs. DY. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS),

In the result, the assessee‘s appeals are allowed

ITA 155/JAB/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 195Section 195(1)Section 195(2)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS), Patharia Phatak, Jabalpur Damoh. (M.P.) [TAN:JBPJ00523F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri G.N. Purohit, Senior Advocate And Shri Abhijit Srivastava, Advocate Respondent by Shri I.B. Khandel, Senior DR Date of hearing 11/12/2019 Date of pronouncement 20/12/2019 O R D E R PER SANJAY ARORA, AM: This is set of two appeals by the Assessee, i.e., for two consecutive years

J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. vs. DY. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS),

In the result, the assessee‘s appeals are allowed

ITA 156/JAB/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Dec 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 195Section 195(1)Section 195(2)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS), Patharia Phatak, Jabalpur Damoh. (M.P.) [TAN:JBPJ00523F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri G.N. Purohit, Senior Advocate And Shri Abhijit Srivastava, Advocate Respondent by Shri I.B. Khandel, Senior DR Date of hearing 11/12/2019 Date of pronouncement 20/12/2019 O R D E R PER SANJAY ARORA, AM: This is set of two appeals by the Assessee, i.e., for two consecutive years

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, ORCHHA BRANCH ,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 57/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) Processing of statements of tax deducted at source. 200A. (1) Where a statement of tax deduction at source [or a correction statement] has been made by a person deducting any sum (hereafter referred to in this section as deductor) under section 200, such statement shall be processed in the following manner, namely:- (a) the sums deductible under this Chapter

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, MAHEWA BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 64/JAB/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) Processing of statements of tax deducted at source. 200A. (1) Where a statement of tax deduction at source [or a correction statement] has been made by a person deducting any sum (hereafter referred to in this section as deductor) under section 200, such statement shall be processed in the following manner, namely:- (a) the sums deductible under this Chapter

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK NEGUAN BRANCH,NEGUWAN SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 56/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) Processing of statements of tax deducted at source. 200A. (1) Where a statement of tax deduction at source [or a correction statement] has been made by a person deducting any sum (hereafter referred to in this section as deductor) under section 200, such statement shall be processed in the following manner, namely:- (a) the sums deductible under this Chapter