Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

76 results for “TDS”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,212 Delhi6,038 Bangalore2,826 Chennai2,498 Kolkata1,785 Pune1,198 Ahmedabad825 Hyderabad825 Karnataka654 Cochin640 Patna559 Jaipur512 Raipur447 Indore434 Chandigarh375 Nagpur363 Surat284 Visakhapatnam255 Rajkot211 Lucknow192 Cuttack146 Amritsar136 Dehradun125 Jodhpur111 Ranchi84 Telangana81 Panaji77 Jabalpur76 Agra75 Guwahati65 Allahabad41 Calcutta31 Varanasi29 SC28 Kerala19 Rajasthan10 Himachal Pradesh8 Punjab & Haryana7 J&K5 Orissa4 Uttarakhand3 Bombay1 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 Gauhati1

Key Topics

TDS65 Addition to Income35 Section 201(1)27 Deduction22 Section 143(3)21 Section 271C20 Section 27120 Section 25019 Section 14717 Section 148

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 35/JAB/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS arises. The Assessing Officer also held that in the case of composite contract, the assessee was required to make application under section 195(2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 34/JAB/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur

Showing 1–20 of 76 · Page 1 of 4

17

20 Sept 2023

AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS arises. The Assessing Officer also held that in the case of composite contract, the assessee was required to make application under section 195(2

SKYLINE AGRO PVT. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1,

In the result, the captioned appeals are dismissed as not maintainable

ITA 236/JAB/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur02 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Sh. Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble

Section 5(2)Section 6

TDS-1) under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, has not been

SKYLINE AGRO PVT. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1,

In the result, the captioned appeals are dismissed as not maintainable

ITA 235/JAB/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur02 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Sh. Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble

Section 5(2)Section 6

TDS-1) under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, has not been

SKYLINE AGRO PVT. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1,

In the result, the captioned appeals are dismissed as not maintainable

ITA 237/JAB/2015[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur02 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Sh. Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble

Section 5(2)Section 6

TDS-1) under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, has not been

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 149/JAB/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

2. The learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal) NFAC was not justified in confirming the disallowance of Rs.29,10,622 which is the deduction claimed by the appellant under section 80P of the act without appreciating that appellant is a sahakari samiti and is maintaining proper books of accounts and deduction claimed under section 80P is allowable to appellant which

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 151/JAB/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

2. The learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal) NFAC was not justified in confirming the disallowance of Rs.29,10,622 which is the deduction claimed by the appellant under section 80P of the act without appreciating that appellant is a sahakari samiti and is maintaining proper books of accounts and deduction claimed under section 80P is allowable to appellant which

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,TATTAM BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 69/JAB/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK,LAUNDI BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 67/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,MAHARAJPUR BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 70/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , NIWADI BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 59/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, MAHEWA BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 64/JAB/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK NEGUAN BRANCH,NEGUWAN SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 56/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,CHHATARPUR BRANCH, SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 68/JAB/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, MAJHOLI BRANCH,MAJHOLI vs. CITO-TDS-2 JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 55/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, ORCHHA BRANCH ,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 57/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, RAJAPUR BRANCH ,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS) JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 58/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , LARON BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 62/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , MANDI BAMORA BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 63/JAB/2022[F.Y- 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, CHANDERA BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 61/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

TDS) O R D E R Per Bench: This is a set of 23 Appeals by different branches of the assessee-bank contesting the confirmation of levy of late filing fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟ hereinafter), aggregating to Rs. 2