BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 195clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,109Mumbai1,020Bangalore624Chennai471Kolkata136Karnataka132Ahmedabad103Jaipur68Pune50Hyderabad49Chandigarh31Rajkot21Visakhapatnam20Lucknow17Raipur16Indore16Cochin15Dehradun9Telangana8Nagpur6SC5Jabalpur4Surat4Agra3Calcutta3Amritsar2Kerala2Punjab & Haryana1Patna1Panaji1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)8Section 2014Section 40A(3)3TDS3Section 1952Addition to Income2Deduction2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 34/JAB/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS) under section 195 of the Act for payments to non-residents. After analysing terms of contract, the Assessing Officer

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 35/JAB/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur
20 Sept 2023
AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS) under section 195 of the Act for payments to non-residents. After analysing terms of contract, the Assessing Officer

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

195/- made by the learned Assessing Officer under section 40A(3) of the Act. 2. Considering the fact that the auditor has treated Rs.7,30,000/- out of telephone and mobile expense, vehicle expense and office expense as personal expense hence the ld CIT(A) was not justified in confirming further disallowance of Rs.2,00,000/- out of these expenses

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-SATNA, SATNA vs. M/S. RAM KUMAR SURESH KUMAR, SATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 136/JAB/2018[2013-14]Status: PendingITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gaaleasst. Commissioner Of Vs Shri Ram Kumar Income Tax, Circle-Satna, Suresh Kumar, Satna Birla Road, Satna (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaffr3899D Revenue By Shri Shravan Kumar Gotru, Cit Dr Assessee By Shri Rahul Bardia, Fca Date Of Hearing 13/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2023 O R D E R Per Om Prakash Kant, A.M.: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against Order Dated 12.03.2018 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Jabalpur [In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”] For The Assessment Year 2013-14, Raising Following Grounds:

Section 133(6)Section 68

195 and the said sale was duly credited to the trading account of the assessee. As rightly contended by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee, such sale not being possible without any corresponding purchases, so made could not otherwise be treated as bogus, despite the failure of the assessee to establish the identity of the concerned creditors/suppliers. It is also