BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “TDS”+ Section 195clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,095Mumbai1,029Bangalore604Chennai472Ahmedabad201Kolkata174Karnataka132Pune98Hyderabad88Chandigarh83Jaipur75Visakhapatnam49Indore39Rajkot33Cochin31Cuttack21Lucknow20Raipur18Dehradun16Surat10Telangana8Jabalpur8Nagpur8Jodhpur7Allahabad6Panaji5SC5Amritsar4Agra4Calcutta3Kerala2Guwahati2Patna1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)12Section 19510Section 194E8TDS7Section 2016Section 194A6Section 194C6Section 194D6Section 194G6Deduction

J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 229/JAB/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur10 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 192Section 193Section 194Section 194ASection 194BSection 194CSection 194DSection 194ESection 194FSection 194G

195 or the income of a foreign company referred to in sub-section (2) of section 196A or the income from units referred to in section 196Bor the income from foreign currency bonds or shares of an Indian company referred to in section 196C or the income of Foreign Institutional Investors from securities referred to in section 196D is credited

6
Addition to Income2

J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 230/JAB/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur10 Dec 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 192Section 193Section 194Section 194ASection 194BSection 194CSection 194DSection 194ESection 194FSection 194G

195 or the income of a foreign company referred to in sub-section (2) of section 196A or the income from units referred to in section 196Bor the income from foreign currency bonds or shares of an Indian company referred to in section 196C or the income of Foreign Institutional Investors from securities referred to in section 196D is credited

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 34/JAB/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS) under section 195 of the Act for payments to non-residents. After analysing terms of contract, the Assessing Officer

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 35/JAB/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS) under section 195 of the Act for payments to non-residents. After analysing terms of contract, the Assessing Officer

J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. vs. DY. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS),

In the result, the assessee‘s appeals are allowed

ITA 155/JAB/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 195Section 195(1)Section 195(2)Section 201Section 201(1)

195(1). The assessee, accordingly, has not contravened the said section so as to be treated as in default qua the commission amount under reference. We decide accordingly. 5. In the result, the assessee‘s appeals are allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on December 20, 2019 (BHAVNESH SAINI) Accountant Member Dated: 20/12/2019 Aks/- Copy of the order forwarded

J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. vs. DY. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS),

In the result, the assessee‘s appeals are allowed

ITA 156/JAB/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Dec 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 195Section 195(1)Section 195(2)Section 201Section 201(1)

195(1). The assessee, accordingly, has not contravened the said section so as to be treated as in default qua the commission amount under reference. We decide accordingly. 5. In the result, the assessee‘s appeals are allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on December 20, 2019 (BHAVNESH SAINI) Accountant Member Dated: 20/12/2019 Aks/- Copy of the order forwarded

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

195/- made by the learned Assessing Officer under section 40A(3) of the Act. 2. Considering the fact that the auditor has treated Rs.7,30,000/- out of telephone and mobile expense, vehicle expense and office expense as personal expense hence the ld CIT(A) was not justified in confirming further disallowance of Rs.2,00,000/- out of these expenses

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-SATNA, SATNA vs. M/S. RAM KUMAR SURESH KUMAR, SATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 136/JAB/2018[2013-14]Status: PendingITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gaaleasst. Commissioner Of Vs Shri Ram Kumar Income Tax, Circle-Satna, Suresh Kumar, Satna Birla Road, Satna (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaffr3899D Revenue By Shri Shravan Kumar Gotru, Cit Dr Assessee By Shri Rahul Bardia, Fca Date Of Hearing 13/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2023 O R D E R Per Om Prakash Kant, A.M.: This Appeal By The Revenue Is Directed Against Order Dated 12.03.2018 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Jabalpur [In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”] For The Assessment Year 2013-14, Raising Following Grounds:

Section 133(6)Section 68

195 and the said sale was duly credited to the trading account of the assessee. As rightly contended by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee, such sale not being possible without any corresponding purchases, so made could not otherwise be treated as bogus, despite the failure of the assessee to establish the identity of the concerned creditors/suppliers. It is also