BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

103 results for “TDS”+ Section 11(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,580Mumbai4,553Bangalore2,356Chennai1,680Pune1,240Kolkata1,188Ahmedabad890Hyderabad823Indore702Jaipur533Chandigarh456Raipur446Cochin427Nagpur306Karnataka305Visakhapatnam289Surat270Cuttack246Rajkot193Lucknow144Amritsar116Jabalpur103Ranchi96Jodhpur86Dehradun76Agra72Patna62Allahabad60Panaji59Guwahati55Telangana43SC21Varanasi14Kerala13Calcutta11Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan6Punjab & Haryana3J&K3Uttarakhand3Orissa2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

TDS94Exemption50Section 200A38Section 234E38Section 201(1)21Section 271C20Section 27120Section 143(3)16Addition to Income16Deduction

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. M/S. GAJRAJ MINING PVT. L:TD., SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as assessee is dismissed

ITA 27/JAB/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT(DR)
Section 2Section 36(1)(iii)Section 43B

TDS. 11. Before us the ld. DR supported the order of the Assessing Officer and the ld. AR relied the order of the ld. CIT(A). 12. Heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the material available on record. 5 CO No. 05/ JAB/2020 Gajraj Mining P Ltd. 13. Section

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER , CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE ,JABALPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

Showing 1–20 of 103 · Page 1 of 6

14
Section 4011
Penalty10

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur18 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Shidharth Seth.Adv. ARFor Respondent: Shri.RajeshKumarGupta.Sr.DR
Section 154Section 156Section 190Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 203ASection 204Section 234ESection 285

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 01.06.2005. Hence, the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under ITA Nos. 4,5,6,7 &23/Jab/2023 Administrative Officer Customs & Central Excise, Jabalpur Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 34/JAB/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS arises. The Assessing Officer also held that in the case of composite contract, the assessee was required to make application under section 195(2) of the Act for determination of the appropriate portion of income of nonresident chargeable to tax in India and make deduction of tax at source accordingly, but the assessee failed in doing so. The Assessing

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JABALPUR vs. ORIENT PAPER MILLS PROP. M/S ORIENT PAPERS &,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 35/JAB/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS arises. The Assessing Officer also held that in the case of composite contract, the assessee was required to make application under section 195(2) of the Act for determination of the appropriate portion of income of nonresident chargeable to tax in India and make deduction of tax at source accordingly, but the assessee failed in doing so. The Assessing

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 100/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

5 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS perused the facts of the case and these grounds relating to the legality of the order passed is bad in law are decided as under- (i) The assessee has challenged the validity of the order passed under section 201(1)/201

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 99/JAB/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

5 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS perused the facts of the case and these grounds relating to the legality of the order passed is bad in law are decided as under- (i) The assessee has challenged the validity of the order passed under section 201(1)/201

MANESSH SHARMA ,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 103/JAB/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

5 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS perused the facts of the case and these grounds relating to the legality of the order passed is bad in law are decided as under- (i) The assessee has challenged the validity of the order passed under section 201(1)/201

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 102/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

5 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS perused the facts of the case and these grounds relating to the legality of the order passed is bad in law are decided as under- (i) The assessee has challenged the validity of the order passed under section 201(1)/201

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 101/JAB/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

5 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS perused the facts of the case and these grounds relating to the legality of the order passed is bad in law are decided as under- (i) The assessee has challenged the validity of the order passed under section 201(1)/201

SHRI SHANKARLAL VISHWKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAB

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 88/JAB/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

TDS return u/s. 200A of the Act. It is not in dispute that Section 200A enable the AO to do certain thing. Admittedly levy of fee is not enabled or otherwise by Parliament before 01.06.2015. Realizing the mistake, the Parliament by Finance Act, 2015 amended the Section 200A by introducing sub clause-c enabling the AO to levy

SHRI SHANKARLAL VISHWKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC- TDS , GHAZIABAB

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 89/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

TDS return u/s. 200A of the Act. It is not in dispute that Section 200A enable the AO to do certain thing. Admittedly levy of fee is not enabled or otherwise by Parliament before 01.06.2015. Realizing the mistake, the Parliament by Finance Act, 2015 amended the Section 200A by introducing sub clause-c enabling the AO to levy

POORAN LAL VISHWAKARMA,KATNI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the three appeals stand allowed

ITA 87/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur11 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesanassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 200ASection 200CSection 231ESection 234ASection 234E

TDS return u/s. 200A of the Act. It is not in dispute that Section 200A enable the AO to do certain thing. Admittedly levy of fee is not enabled or otherwise by Parliament before 01.06.2015. Realizing the mistake, the Parliament by Finance Act, 2015 amended the Section 200A by introducing sub clause-c enabling the AO to levy

SAURABH SINGHAI L/H LATE SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR JAIN,SAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-3 SAGAR, SAGAR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeal is dismissed

ITA 5/JAB/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble & Sh. Manomohan Das, Hon‟Ble

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148(1)Section 263

5. The assessee has not complied with the provisions of section 194C(7) of the Act where the statute of the Act mandates the requirement of fulfillment of section 194C(7) when the conditions laid down in provisions of section 194C(6) are satisfied. TDS provisions are complimentary in nature. The exemption for non-deduction of tax has been given

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK NEGUAN BRANCH,NEGUWAN SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 56/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

5 | P a g e ITA Nos. 55-77/JAB/2022 Madhyanchal Gramin Bank v. ITO (TDS) I.T.A. No. 75/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2014-15) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Buxwaha Branch, Poddar Colony, Tili Road, Sagar [PAN : AAAJM 1901 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 76/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2013-14) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Mandi

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, CHANDERA BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 61/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

5 | P a g e ITA Nos. 55-77/JAB/2022 Madhyanchal Gramin Bank v. ITO (TDS) I.T.A. No. 75/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2014-15) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Buxwaha Branch, Poddar Colony, Tili Road, Sagar [PAN : AAAJM 1901 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 76/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2013-14) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Mandi

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , NIWADI BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 59/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

5 | P a g e ITA Nos. 55-77/JAB/2022 Madhyanchal Gramin Bank v. ITO (TDS) I.T.A. No. 75/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2014-15) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Buxwaha Branch, Poddar Colony, Tili Road, Sagar [PAN : AAAJM 1901 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 76/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2013-14) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Mandi

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , LARON BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 62/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

5 | P a g e ITA Nos. 55-77/JAB/2022 Madhyanchal Gramin Bank v. ITO (TDS) I.T.A. No. 75/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2014-15) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Buxwaha Branch, Poddar Colony, Tili Road, Sagar [PAN : AAAJM 1901 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 76/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2013-14) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Mandi

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , MANDI BAMORA BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 63/JAB/2022[F.Y- 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

5 | P a g e ITA Nos. 55-77/JAB/2022 Madhyanchal Gramin Bank v. ITO (TDS) I.T.A. No. 75/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2014-15) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Buxwaha Branch, Poddar Colony, Tili Road, Sagar [PAN : AAAJM 1901 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 76/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2013-14) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Mandi

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, ORCHHA BRANCH ,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 57/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

5 | P a g e ITA Nos. 55-77/JAB/2022 Madhyanchal Gramin Bank v. ITO (TDS) I.T.A. No. 75/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2014-15) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Buxwaha Branch, Poddar Colony, Tili Road, Sagar [PAN : AAAJM 1901 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 76/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2013-14) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Mandi

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , MOHANGARH BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 60/JAB/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

5 | P a g e ITA Nos. 55-77/JAB/2022 Madhyanchal Gramin Bank v. ITO (TDS) I.T.A. No. 75/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2014-15) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Buxwaha Branch, Poddar Colony, Tili Road, Sagar [PAN : AAAJM 1901 A] (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 76/JAB/2022 (Asst. Year: 2013-14) Madhyanchal Gramin Bank, vs. ITO (TDS)-1, Jabalpur. Mandi