THE ACIT, CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S. MANISH AGRO TECH PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result grounds of revenue for A

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

losses without considering explanation and documentary evidence submitted by the assessee and he Cross Objection Nos.5 & 6/Ind/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2015-16 proceeded to make addition on the basis of report of Investigation Wing Ahmadabad. From first appellate order, we clearly observed that the Ld. CIT(A) has considered all facts and circumstances in a totality and also considered

ACIT (CENTRAL)-1 INDORE, INDORE vs. ESSENCE COMMODITIES (P) LTD., INDORE

In the result all the appeals of revenue for A

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

reassessment proceedings made detailed enquiry and established beyond doubt that the losses obtained by assessee on NMCE platform were contrived losses and these losses were incurred by executing the synchronized trade dealings in illiquid commodities. The Ld. CIT(DR) also submitted that Cross Objection No.17/Ind/2020 Cross Objection Nos.04 & 09/Ind/2021 Essence Commodities Pvt. Ltd., the losses were incurred with a specific

ACIT,CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S ESSENCE COMMODITIES P LTD, INDORE

In the result all the appeals of revenue for A

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

reassessment proceedings made detailed enquiry and established beyond doubt that the losses obtained by assessee on NMCE platform were contrived losses and these losses were incurred by executing the synchronized trade dealings in illiquid commodities. The Ld. CIT(DR) also submitted that Cross Objection No.17/Ind/2020 Cross Objection Nos.04 & 09/Ind/2021 Essence Commodities Pvt. Ltd., the losses were incurred with a specific

M/S. SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICES P. LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1), INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

forward the same for set off in next year’s. This loss includes Rs 6,65,769/- for depreciation on building, which was rented to M/s Jasleen Education Service Society, without consideration. The assessee has claimed depreciation, which is not allowable as the building has not been utilized for the business purpose of the assessee. Further the assessee has also

M/S SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICE PVT LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1), INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

forward the same for set off in next year’s. This loss includes Rs 6,65,769/- for depreciation on building, which was rented to M/s Jasleen Education Service Society, without consideration. The assessee has claimed depreciation, which is not allowable as the building has not been utilized for the business purpose of the assessee. Further the assessee has also

M/S SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICE PVT LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1), INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

forward the same for set off in next year’s. This loss includes Rs 6,65,769/- for depreciation on building, which was rented to M/s Jasleen Education Service Society, without consideration. The assessee has claimed depreciation, which is not allowable as the building has not been utilized for the business purpose of the assessee. Further the assessee has also

M/S. SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICES P. LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1), INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

forward the same for set off in next year’s. This loss includes Rs 6,65,769/- for depreciation on building, which was rented to M/s Jasleen Education Service Society, without consideration. The assessee has claimed depreciation, which is not allowable as the building has not been utilized for the business purpose of the assessee. Further the assessee has also

M/S. SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICES P LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1) RANGE-5, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

forward the same for set off in next year’s. This loss includes Rs 6,65,769/- for depreciation on building, which was rented to M/s Jasleen Education Service Society, without consideration. The assessee has claimed depreciation, which is not allowable as the building has not been utilized for the business purpose of the assessee. Further the assessee has also

THE ACIT,CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S PRAKASH OILS LTD., DHAR

In the result, the above captioned appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

carry out necessary investigation, who in turn forwarded the said letter to the AO for information. Considering the fact that the appellant has suffered losses on trades on NMCE through brokers S. N. Commodities and Shubhlaxmi Commodities the appellant was required to file confirmed copy of accounts from both the brokers and to explain as to why the loss should

THE ACIT ,CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S PRAKASH OILS LTD., DHAR

In the result, the above captioned appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

carry out necessary investigation, who in turn forwarded the said letter to the AO for information. Considering the fact that the appellant has suffered losses on trades on NMCE through brokers S. N. Commodities and Shubhlaxmi Commodities the appellant was required to file confirmed copy of accounts from both the brokers and to explain as to why the loss should

THE ADDL. CIT RANGE -1, INDORE vs. M/S PRAKASH OILS LTD., DHAR

In the result, the above captioned appeals filed by the Revenue as well as the

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

carry out necessary investigation, who in turn forwarded the said letter to the AO for information. Considering the fact that the appellant has suffered losses on trades on NMCE through brokers S. N. Commodities and Shubhlaxmi Commodities the appellant was required to file confirmed copy of accounts from both the brokers and to explain as to why the loss should

PRAYANK JAIN,INDORE vs. ACIT5(1), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

forward business loss. (Tax Effect Rs. 205916/-) 6. Any other ground may be permitted to be taken later That the appellant further craves leave to add, to alter and or to amend any of the foregoing grounds of appeal as and when necessary. (No Tax Effect) 3. From perusal of the above grounds we find that following Shivnarayan Sharma

SAPAN SHAH,INDORE vs. ACIT-4(I), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

forward business loss. (Tax Effect Rs. 205916/-) 6. Any other ground may be permitted to be taken later That the appellant further craves leave to add, to alter and or to amend any of the foregoing grounds of appeal as and when necessary. (No Tax Effect) 3. From perusal of the above grounds we find that following Shivnarayan Sharma

DARSHAN KUMAR PAHWA,INDORE vs. DCIT CIRCLE5(1), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

forward business loss. (Tax Effect Rs. 205916/-) 6. Any other ground may be permitted to be taken later That the appellant further craves leave to add, to alter and or to amend any of the foregoing grounds of appeal as and when necessary. (No Tax Effect) 3. From perusal of the above grounds we find that following Shivnarayan Sharma

GOVIND HARINARAYAN AGRAWAL HUF,INDORE vs. I T O 2(1), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

forward business loss. (Tax Effect Rs. 205916/-) 6. Any other ground may be permitted to be taken later That the appellant further craves leave to add, to alter and or to amend any of the foregoing grounds of appeal as and when necessary. (No Tax Effect) 3. From perusal of the above grounds we find that following Shivnarayan Sharma

SHIV NARAYAN SHARMA,INDORE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 3(1), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

forward business loss. (Tax Effect Rs. 205916/-) 6. Any other ground may be permitted to be taken later That the appellant further craves leave to add, to alter and or to amend any of the foregoing grounds of appeal as and when necessary. (No Tax Effect) 3. From perusal of the above grounds we find that following Shivnarayan Sharma

MANISH GOVIND AGRAWAL HUF,INDORE vs. I T O 2(1), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

forward business loss. (Tax Effect Rs. 205916/-) 6. Any other ground may be permitted to be taken later That the appellant further craves leave to add, to alter and or to amend any of the foregoing grounds of appeal as and when necessary. (No Tax Effect) 3. From perusal of the above grounds we find that following Shivnarayan Sharma

M/S CHYGH ESTATE P LTD,INDORE vs. THE DY CIT ,CENTRAL-2, INDORE

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

loss of Rs.1,19,663/-. For the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration, the assessee company has not carried out any business activity. A copy of the acknowledgement of income-tax return along with computation of total income for the assessment year under consideration, as filed under s.l39(3) of the Act. 3.2 Search and Seizure operations