ACIT (CENTRAL)-1 INDORE, INDORE vs. ESSENCE COMMODITIES (P) LTD., INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was correct in deleting the disallowance. The assessee had provided evidence of genuine business transactions, incurred losses on similar commodities on other exchanges, and the AO failed to provide cogent evidence to prove the losses were bogus.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance of losses claimed by the assessee on commodity trades. The Assessing Officer (AO) alleged these losses were contrived and incurred through synchronized trades on the NMCE platform to reduce taxable income.
What were the issues?
Whether losses incurred on commodity trades were genuine business losses or contrived to evade tax. Whether the AO provided sufficient evidence to disprove the genuineness of the losses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. CIT657 citing255 ITR 273 · 2002 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Value Capital Services (P) Ltd.216 citing307 ITR 334 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd. v. CIT37 citing300 ITR 251 · 2008 · SC · Read judgment
- 5 citing
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCHES “DB”: INDORE
Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG & SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI
PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, J.M.
The above captioned appeals have been filed by the Revenue against the Orders of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Bhopal,
dated 26.03.2019 A.Y. 2011-12, dated 12.02.2020 for AY
2013-14 an
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 133(6)
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Rangoli Hotel, Mehsana vs DCIT, Circle, Gandhinagar, GandhiangarITA 2286/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Ritu Rajesh Gohil, Jamnagar, Gujarat vs ITO Ward 2(1), Jamnagar, GujaratITA 109/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026