ACIT (CENTRAL)-1 INDORE, INDORE vs. ESSENCE COMMODITIES (P) LTD., INDORE

ITA 675/IND/2019Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 February 2023AY 2011-12Bench: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG (Judicial Member), SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI (Accountant Member)32 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was correct in deleting the disallowance. The assessee had provided evidence of genuine business transactions, incurred losses on similar commodities on other exchanges, and the AO failed to provide cogent evidence to prove the losses were bogus.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of disallowance of losses claimed by the assessee on commodity trades. The Assessing Officer (AO) alleged these losses were contrived and incurred through synchronized trades on the NMCE platform to reduce taxable income.

What were the issues?

Whether losses incurred on commodity trades were genuine business losses or contrived to evade tax. Whether the AO provided sufficient evidence to disprove the genuineness of the losses.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 133(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCHES “DB”: INDORE

Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG & SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI

Hearing: 15.11.2022Pronounced: 10.12.2023

PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, J.M.

The above captioned appeals have been filed by the Revenue against the Orders of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Bhopal,

dated 26.03.2019 A.Y. 2011-12, dated 12.02.2020 for AY

2013-14 an

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 133(6)

All 7,227 judgments and leading authorities on Section 133(6) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →