BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

66 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 131(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai556Delhi489Jaipur184Ahmedabad134Bangalore119Kolkata102Karnataka100Chennai70Indore66Raipur43Hyderabad43Pune40Calcutta34Chandigarh26Rajkot24Lucknow22Nagpur21Surat20Visakhapatnam17Kerala14Panaji13Allahabad9Jabalpur9Guwahati9Agra5Cuttack3Cochin3Rajasthan2Jodhpur2SC2Telangana2

Key Topics

Section 271D191Section 269S82Addition to Income47Penalty35Section 6815Section 271(1)(c)15Section 143(3)14Disallowance14Section 147

VIMAL TODI,INDORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 188/IND/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Mar 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshishri Vimal Todi, Additional Commissioner बनाम/ 501, Darshan Residency, Of Income-Tax, Vs. 104-105, Anand Bazar, Indore Indore

Section 132Section 254(2)Section 271DSection 275Section 275(1)(c)

D E R Per B.M. Biyani, AM: Feeling aggrieved by order of first-appeal dated 29.12.2023 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, Bhopal [“CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of penalty-order dated 28.03.2019 passed by Addl. CIT (Central), Indore u/s 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for assessment-year

M/S TRUBA EDUCATION SOCIETY ,BHOPAL vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Showing 1–20 of 66 · Page 1 of 4

13
Section 271E13
Section 271C12
Natural Justice7
ITA 801/IND/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Apr 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Udayan Das Gupta

Section 11Section 127(2)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 2(15)

271(1)(c) of the Act. However, the principle is applicable with reference to the other provisions also which are penal in nature. Cancellation of registration deprives the assessee of the various benefits which otherwise accrue and hence the provisions are to be considered as in the nature of punishment. 4.5 The Id. A.R. submitted that, the order passed

THE DCIT, 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 405/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

D E R PER BENCH: In the above captioned appeals, 21 appeals are at the instance of respective assessee(s) and are directed against the respective ordersof Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), (in short ‘CIT(A)’), Bhopaland Ld. ACIT 1(2), Bhopal as under :- 2 IT(SS)ANos.158 to 175/Ind/2015 && others Chawla Group Name of Assessment Date of Date

LATE SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA L/H SHRI PREM CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 441/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

D E R PER BENCH: In the above captioned appeals, 21 appeals are at the instance of respective assessee(s) and are directed against the respective ordersof Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), (in short ‘CIT(A)’), Bhopaland Ld. ACIT 1(2), Bhopal as under :- 2 IT(SS)ANos.158 to 175/Ind/2015 && others Chawla Group Name of Assessment Date of Date

SMT. SARITA CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 442/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

D E R PER BENCH: In the above captioned appeals, 21 appeals are at the instance of respective assessee(s) and are directed against the respective ordersof Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), (in short ‘CIT(A)’), Bhopaland Ld. ACIT 1(2), Bhopal as under :- 2 IT(SS)ANos.158 to 175/Ind/2015 && others Chawla Group Name of Assessment Date of Date

VIMAL TODI,INDORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE

Appeals are allowed

ITA 190/IND/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 253(5)Section 269SSection 271D

D E R Per Bench: The captioned three appeals are filed by assessee assailing two separate appeal-orders, one for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2012-13 and other for AYs 2013-14 & 2014-15, both dated 29.12.2023 and passed by learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, Bhopal [“CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of respective penalty-orders dated

VIMAL TODI,INDORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE

Appeals are allowed

ITA 189/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 153ASection 253(5)Section 269SSection 271D

D E R Per Bench: The captioned three appeals are filed by assessee assailing two separate appeal-orders, one for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2012-13 and other for AYs 2013-14 & 2014-15, both dated 29.12.2023 and passed by learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-3, Bhopal [“CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of respective penalty-orders dated

SHRI SURENDRA SINGH BHATIA,INDORE vs. THE JCIT-3, INDORE

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 252/IND/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Nov 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate with Shri Gagan TiwariFor Respondent: 28.09.2022
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 271ASection 271DSection 274Section 41(1)

D’ Bench in the case of DCIT vs. Rajendra Prasad Dokania (2012) 32 CCH 260 AhdTrib. A copy of the judgment is being submitted herewith for kind perusal and record of Your ITA No.252/Ind/2017 (Shri Surendra Singh Bhatia vs. JCIT) Asst.Year.– 2008-09 - 13 - Honour as Annexure A-6.00 [PB page No. 111 to 114]. For a ready reference

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 266/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 May 2023

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani&

Section 194HSection 201Section 271Section 271C

D E R Per Bench: These five (5) appeals by the assessee are directed against the five separate orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short Ld. CIT(A)-II, Indore all dated 01.02.2018 arising from penalty levied u/s 271C of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2008-09, 2011-12 to 2014-15 respectively. The assessee

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 268/IND/2018[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 May 2023

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani&

Section 194HSection 201Section 271Section 271C

D E R Per Bench: These five (5) appeals by the assessee are directed against the five separate orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short Ld. CIT(A)-II, Indore all dated 01.02.2018 arising from penalty levied u/s 271C of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2008-09, 2011-12 to 2014-15 respectively. The assessee

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 269/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 May 2023

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani&

Section 194HSection 201Section 271Section 271C

D E R Per Bench: These five (5) appeals by the assessee are directed against the five separate orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short Ld. CIT(A)-II, Indore all dated 01.02.2018 arising from penalty levied u/s 271C of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2008-09, 2011-12 to 2014-15 respectively. The assessee

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 267/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 May 2023

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani&

Section 194HSection 201Section 271Section 271C

D E R Per Bench: These five (5) appeals by the assessee are directed against the five separate orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short Ld. CIT(A)-II, Indore all dated 01.02.2018 arising from penalty levied u/s 271C of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2008-09, 2011-12 to 2014-15 respectively. The assessee

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 797/IND/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

D-Shop' cannot be explained and no material has been collected to explain the same. Likewise, the figures too are totally unexplained and on the basis of notings and jottings, it cannot be said that these are the transactions carried out by the assessee for advancing money or for taking money. Thus, in our opinion. this is a dumb document

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 795/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

D-Shop' cannot be explained and no material has been collected to explain the same. Likewise, the figures too are totally unexplained and on the basis of notings and jottings, it cannot be said that these are the transactions carried out by the assessee for advancing money or for taking money. Thus, in our opinion. this is a dumb document

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 805/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

D-Shop' cannot be explained and no material has been collected to explain the same. Likewise, the figures too are totally unexplained and on the basis of notings and jottings, it cannot be said that these are the transactions carried out by the assessee for advancing money or for taking money. Thus, in our opinion. this is a dumb document

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 804/IND/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

D-Shop' cannot be explained and no material has been collected to explain the same. Likewise, the figures too are totally unexplained and on the basis of notings and jottings, it cannot be said that these are the transactions carried out by the assessee for advancing money or for taking money. Thus, in our opinion. this is a dumb document

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 799/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

D-Shop' cannot be explained and no material has been collected to explain the same. Likewise, the figures too are totally unexplained and on the basis of notings and jottings, it cannot be said that these are the transactions carried out by the assessee for advancing money or for taking money. Thus, in our opinion. this is a dumb document

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 801/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

D-Shop' cannot be explained and no material has been collected to explain the same. Likewise, the figures too are totally unexplained and on the basis of notings and jottings, it cannot be said that these are the transactions carried out by the assessee for advancing money or for taking money. Thus, in our opinion. this is a dumb document

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 798/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

D-Shop' cannot be explained and no material has been collected to explain the same. Likewise, the figures too are totally unexplained and on the basis of notings and jottings, it cannot be said that these are the transactions carried out by the assessee for advancing money or for taking money. Thus, in our opinion. this is a dumb document

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 796/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

D-Shop' cannot be explained and no material has been collected to explain the same. Likewise, the figures too are totally unexplained and on the basis of notings and jottings, it cannot be said that these are the transactions carried out by the assessee for advancing money or for taking money. Thus, in our opinion. this is a dumb document