BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “disallowance”+ Section 747clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi219Mumbai199Ahmedabad63Jaipur47Kolkata36Chennai34Bangalore30Pune29Chandigarh22Visakhapatnam12Indore12Hyderabad11Lucknow10Surat8Cuttack7Amritsar5Ranchi4Panaji4Nagpur3Rajkot3SC3Agra2Patna2Raipur2Cochin2Jodhpur1Guwahati1Calcutta1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Disallowance12Addition to Income12Section 234A9Section 12A8Section 143(3)7Section 271(1)(c)5Penalty5Section 143(2)4Section 684Section 148

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5(1), INDORE vs. M/S SUNDERDEEP CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. , INDORE

In the result both the appeals of the revenue vide ITA No

ITA 786/IND/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

Section 37(1) of the Act. c) Development charges whether received or not would accrue to the assessee at the rate of Rs.170/- per Sq. Feet at par with 22 buyers of the plots as detailed in para 13 and 14 above and thus, the development charges would not be a charge on the assessee's profit as the same

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5(1), INDORE vs. M/S SUNDERDEEP CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. , INDORE

In the result both the appeals of the revenue vide ITA No

ITA 784/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Mar 2021
4
Section 104
Reassessment4
AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

Section 37(1) of the Act. c) Development charges whether received or not would accrue to the assessee at the rate of Rs.170/- per Sq. Feet at par with 22 buyers of the plots as detailed in para 13 and 14 above and thus, the development charges would not be a charge on the assessee's profit as the same

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I, BHOPAL , BHOPAL vs. SOM DISTILLERIES PRIVATE LIMITED, BHOPAL

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 289/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234A

section 250(2)(b) of the Act and in response to his notice, the AO failed to submit any report. Further, in absence of any specific request from the AO, the CIT(A) presumed that the AO did not want to attend the hearings. Thus, when the case involved whopping addition and the AO considered his additions on sound footing

SOM DISTILLERIES PVT. LTD.,BHOPAL vs. ITO-1(3), BHOPAL

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 272/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234A

section 250(2)(b) of the Act and in response to his notice, the AO failed to submit any report. Further, in absence of any specific request from the AO, the CIT(A) presumed that the AO did not want to attend the hearings. Thus, when the case involved whopping addition and the AO considered his additions on sound footing

THE NIMAR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KHANDWA vs. THE EXEMPTION CIRCLE, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 162/IND/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanithe Nimar Educational Society Cit(E) Harsud Road, Civil Lines Bhopal Vs. East Nimar, Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aabtt 1409 K Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrwal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 14.06.2023

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 143(3)Section 80G

disallowance on account of interest expenditure. The AO while passing the scrutiny assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 05.12.2018 assessed the total income of Rs.2,94,84,953/-. The assessee challenged the action of the AO before the Ld. CIT(A) who has granted part relief of exemption u/s 10(23C) (iiiad) of the Act in respect

JASTEJ GOROWARA,BHOPAL vs. CIT(A), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 276/IND/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Dec 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

disallowance made by the learned A.O. and confirmed by Learned CIT(A) be held to be high and unreasonable and be suitably reduced. 3. The appellant craves leave to add, mend or alter any Ground of Appeal before or during the course of appellate proceedings.” First we shall deal with ITA No. 276/Ind/2025 (A.Y. 2011-12) 3. The brief facts

JASTEJ GOROWARA,BHOPAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 277/IND/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

disallowance made by the learned A.O. and confirmed by Learned CIT(A) be held to be high and unreasonable and be suitably reduced. 3. The appellant craves leave to add, mend or alter any Ground of Appeal before or during the course of appellate proceedings.” First we shall deal with ITA No. 276/Ind/2025 (A.Y. 2011-12) 3. The brief facts

THE DCIT, 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 405/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

747/- and partly allow Ground No.7of the assessee’s appeal and Ground No.3 of the revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07. 66. Now we take up Ground No.8 of the assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 in ITA No.441/Ind/2015 through which the assessee has challenged the finding of Ld. CIT(A) confirming the addition of Rs.24

LATE SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA L/H SHRI PREM CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 441/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

747/- and partly allow Ground No.7of the assessee’s appeal and Ground No.3 of the revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07. 66. Now we take up Ground No.8 of the assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 in ITA No.441/Ind/2015 through which the assessee has challenged the finding of Ld. CIT(A) confirming the addition of Rs.24

SMT. SARITA CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

ITA 442/IND/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 271(1)(c)

747/- and partly allow Ground No.7of the assessee’s appeal and Ground No.3 of the revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07. 66. Now we take up Ground No.8 of the assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 in ITA No.441/Ind/2015 through which the assessee has challenged the finding of Ld. CIT(A) confirming the addition of Rs.24

ACIT (CENTRAL)-1 INDORE, INDORE vs. ESSENCE COMMODITIES (P) LTD., INDORE

In the result all the appeals of revenue for A

ITA 675/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Feb 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Shreya JainFor Respondent: Shri P.K Mishra, CIT (DR)

disallowances has made by the A.O. is merely on presumption basis. Reliance is placed on the following case laws:- (i) Bharti Syntex Limited vs CIT 137 TTJ 82 ( Jaipur Bench) (i) CIT vs Value Capital Services (P) Ltd 307 ITR 334 ( Delhi) 1. The commodities in which the appellant traded were highly liquid commodities and mainly belong to top traded

ACIT,CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S ESSENCE COMMODITIES P LTD, INDORE

In the result all the appeals of revenue for A

ITA 184/IND/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Shreya JainFor Respondent: Shri P.K Mishra, CIT (DR)

disallowances has made by the A.O. is merely on presumption basis. Reliance is placed on the following case laws:- (i) Bharti Syntex Limited vs CIT 137 TTJ 82 ( Jaipur Bench) (i) CIT vs Value Capital Services (P) Ltd 307 ITR 334 ( Delhi) 1. The commodities in which the appellant traded were highly liquid commodities and mainly belong to top traded