BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

19 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai47Chennai30Bangalore28Delhi25Indore19Ahmedabad13Hyderabad13Kolkata10Agra8Jaipur7Surat7Panaji5Cochin5Pune4Visakhapatnam3Nagpur2Chandigarh2Raipur2SC1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D184Section 269S78Section 143(3)21Penalty19Section 271E17Section 14711Section 1488Section 1324Section 2633Reassessment

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ACIT-3(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 275/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

section 143(3), penalty order passed u/s 271E of the Act and assessment order passed u/s 143(3) for A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2014-15 respectively. For A.Y.2008-09 the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: ITANo.275 to 277/Ind/2023 RVT Technologies Ltd. “1.On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the honourable CIT(A) was not justified

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

3
Reopening of Assessment3
Disallowance3
ITA 277/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Indore
30 May 2024
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

section 143(3), penalty order passed u/s 271E of the Act and assessment order passed u/s 143(3) for A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2014-15 respectively. For A.Y.2008-09 the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: ITANo.275 to 277/Ind/2023 RVT Technologies Ltd. “1.On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the honourable CIT(A) was not justified

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ADDL. CIT-RANGE-3, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 276/IND/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

section 143(3), penalty order passed u/s 271E of the Act and assessment order passed u/s 143(3) for A.Ys. 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2014-15 respectively. For A.Y.2008-09 the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: ITANo.275 to 277/Ind/2023 RVT Technologies Ltd. “1.On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the honourable CIT(A) was not justified

ACIT(CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. PRAKASH ASPHALTINGS & TOLL HIGHWAYS (INDIA) LTD., MHOW

In the result, assessee’s ITA No

ITA 20/IND/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2008-09 Prakash Asphaltings & Toll Acit (Central)-1 Of Highway (India) Ltd., Indore बनाम/ 76, Mall Road, Vs. Mhow (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Assessment Year: 2008-09 Acit, Central-1, Prakash Asphaltings & Indore Toll Of Highway (India) बनाम/ Ltd., 76, Mall Road, Vs. Mhow (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee)

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 271D

271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is as under: 1. The Search and seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted on the business premises of Agroh Infrascucture Developers Pvt. ltd. (AIDPL) and Prakash Asphalting and Toll Highways (India) Ltd. (PATH). Subsequently, the assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s

M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOO HIGHWAY LTD.,INDORE vs. THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE

In the result, assessee’s ITA No

ITA 283/IND/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2008-09 Prakash Asphaltings & Toll Acit (Central)-1 Of Highway (India) Ltd., Indore बनाम/ 76, Mall Road, Vs. Mhow (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Assessment Year: 2008-09 Acit, Central-1, Prakash Asphaltings & Indore Toll Of Highway (India) बनाम/ Ltd., 76, Mall Road, Vs. Mhow (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee)

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 271D

271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is as under: 1. The Search and seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was conducted on the business premises of Agroh Infrascucture Developers Pvt. ltd. (AIDPL) and Prakash Asphalting and Toll Highways (India) Ltd. (PATH). Subsequently, the assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 794/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 796/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 798/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 799/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 800/IND/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 801/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 802/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 803/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 795/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 804/IND/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 805/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 797/IND/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 793/IND/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material, namely “Page

M/S RANA & JOSHI BUILDTECH P LTD,INDORE vs. THE PCIT-1, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 229/IND/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S. Rana & Joshi Buildtech Pr. Cit-1 Pvt. Ltd. Bhopal (Formerly Known As M/S Rana Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. ) Vs. 218 Civil Lines, Below Dainik Bhaskar Office Vidisha (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aafcr9858P Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrawal Ar Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 11.09.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 26 .09.2024

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 271E

271E by filing the appeal before the CIT(A) within the period of limitation. All these facts and circumstances show that the assesse was very prompt in taking necessary steps for filing the appeal whenever it is advised so. The Director of the assessee has filed affidavit narrating surrounding circumstances and cause of delay as under: Page