BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

19 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai50Delhi41Chennai36Bangalore32Kolkata20Indore19Jaipur16Hyderabad14Ahmedabad11Agra9Pune7Panaji6Surat6Cochin5Visakhapatnam3Chandigarh2Raipur2SC1Lucknow1Jabalpur1Rajkot1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D185Section 269S78Section 143(3)19Penalty19Section 271E16Section 14711Section 1488Section 271A7Section 1325Reassessment

M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOO HIGHWAY LTD.,INDORE vs. THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE

In the result, assessee’s ITA No

ITA 283/IND/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2008-09 Prakash Asphaltings & Toll Acit (Central)-1 Of Highway (India) Ltd., Indore बनाम/ 76, Mall Road, Vs. Mhow (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Assessment Year: 2008-09 Acit, Central-1, Prakash Asphaltings & Indore Toll Of Highway (India) बनाम/ Ltd., 76, Mall Road, Vs. Mhow (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee)

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 271D

section 269SS and made itself liable for levy of penalty u/s 271D r.w.s. 269SS of the Act. I, therefore, levy a penalty of Rs. 1,15,00,000/- (Rupees one crore fifteen lakh only) u/s 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment-Year 2008-09.” 13. Against penalty-order, the assessee filed first-appeal

3
Reopening of Assessment3
Disallowance3

ACIT(CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. PRAKASH ASPHALTINGS & TOLL HIGHWAYS (INDIA) LTD., MHOW

In the result, assessee’s ITA No

ITA 20/IND/2021[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2008-09 Prakash Asphaltings & Toll Acit (Central)-1 Of Highway (India) Ltd., Indore बनाम/ 76, Mall Road, Vs. Mhow (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Assessment Year: 2008-09 Acit, Central-1, Prakash Asphaltings & Indore Toll Of Highway (India) बनाम/ Ltd., 76, Mall Road, Vs. Mhow (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee)

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 271D

section 269SS and made itself liable for levy of penalty u/s 271D r.w.s. 269SS of the Act. I, therefore, levy a penalty of Rs. 1,15,00,000/- (Rupees one crore fifteen lakh only) u/s 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment-Year 2008-09.” 13. Against penalty-order, the assessee filed first-appeal

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 802/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 803/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 804/IND/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 805/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 797/IND/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 793/IND/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 794/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 795/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 796/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 798/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 799/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 800/IND/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

THE ACIT, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. M/S. PRAKASH ASHPHLTING & TOLL HIGHWAY LTD., INDORE

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 801/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 269SSection 271DSection 271E

271D and Rs. 1,64,00,000/- u/s 271E imposed by JCIT) in respect of cash loans taken/cash repayments alleged to have been made by assessee from/to M/s Agroh Infrastructure Developers Pvt. Ltd. The JCIT has discussed this issue at length in Para 6 / Page 19-23 of penalty-order. In this regard, Ld. AR submitted that the said material

SHRI SURENDRA SINGH BHATIA,INDORE vs. THE JCIT-3, INDORE

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 252/IND/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Nov 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate with Shri Gagan TiwariFor Respondent: 28.09.2022
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 271ASection 271DSection 274Section 41(1)

271D r.w.s. 274 of the Act was issued upon the assessee: “Whereas in the course of proceedings before me for the Assessment Year 2008- 09; it appears to me that you have contravened the provisions of section 132(4) during the relevant previous, year. Failure to comply with the provisions of section 132(4) attracts penal, provisions of section 271AAA

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ADDL. CIT-RANGE-3, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 276/IND/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

disallow the said claim without any new facts or record is not permissible being change of opinion. Hence, we hold that the reopening of the assessment is not valid and the same is quashed. Since the reopening of the assessment is quashed therefore, the issues raised by the assessee on merits becomes infructuous. 6. For A.Y.2009-10 the assessee has raised

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 277/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

disallow the said claim without any new facts or record is not permissible being change of opinion. Hence, we hold that the reopening of the assessment is not valid and the same is quashed. Since the reopening of the assessment is quashed therefore, the issues raised by the assessee on merits becomes infructuous. 6. For A.Y.2009-10 the assessee has raised

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ACIT-3(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 275/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

disallow the said claim without any new facts or record is not permissible being change of opinion. Hence, we hold that the reopening of the assessment is not valid and the same is quashed. Since the reopening of the assessment is quashed therefore, the issues raised by the assessee on merits becomes infructuous. 6. For A.Y.2009-10 the assessee has raised