BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

80 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 32clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai673Chennai650Delhi632Kolkata429Hyderabad327Pune299Bangalore252Ahmedabad249Jaipur173Karnataka150Chandigarh150Nagpur115Visakhapatnam102Amritsar90Raipur88Surat83Indore80Lucknow66Cuttack62Panaji56Calcutta43Rajkot41Cochin39SC33Guwahati28Patna23Agra20Telangana18Allahabad15Jodhpur15Varanasi11Jabalpur7Ranchi7Dehradun6Rajasthan5Himachal Pradesh3Orissa3Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Kerala1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)44Addition to Income42Section 14441Section 271(1)(c)33Section 14829Condonation of Delay27Section 26326Disallowance26Section 12A

M/S NEO SACK LTD. vs. THE ACIT 4(2),

In the result, appeals of the assessee bearing No

ITA 263/IND/2008[05-Apr]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Ble

Section 43BSection 5

section is not a matter of right for the party who pleads the condonation but it depends on the discretion of the Court. The Court must be satisfied that the delay is caused due to a genuine reason. It is sufficiency of the cause which counts and not length of delay. 10. In view of the above legal position

M/S NEO SACK LTD vs. THE ACIT 4(2),

In the result, appeals of the assessee bearing No

ITA 262/IND/2008[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2018AY 2002-2003

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Ble

Showing 1–20 of 80 · Page 1 of 4

24
Section 271A24
Limitation/Time-bar22
Section 14A18
Section 43BSection 5

section is not a matter of right for the party who pleads the condonation but it depends on the discretion of the Court. The Court must be satisfied that the delay is caused due to a genuine reason. It is sufficiency of the cause which counts and not length of delay. 10. In view of the above legal position

M/S. M. LODHA IMPEX,RATLAM vs. THE ITO-1, RATLAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 185/IND/2016[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2018AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradआ.अ.सं /.I.T.A. No. 185/Ind/2016 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2000-01 M/S.M.Lodha Impex, Vs. Income-Tax Officer, 117-118, Manak Chowk, Ward 1, Ratlam. Ratlam.

For Appellant: Shri Satiksh Solanki, DRFor Respondent: 29.05.2018
Section 119(1)(b)Section 119(2)(b)Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234A

section 119(2)(b) for condonation of delay in filing -: 32 :- M.LODHA IMPEX,RATLAM. return involving refund claims up to Rs. 10,00,000. 3. The applications/claims

M/S. GREATER KAILASH HOSPITAL (P) LTD.,INDORE vs. ACIT-2(1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, being not maintainable is

ITA 628/IND/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyaniassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Agrawal, AR &For Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 32Section 36(1)(iii)Section 36(1)(va)

section 32 of the Act of Rs. 2,62,09,454/- 4. The appellant reserves its right to add, alter and modify the grounds of appeal as taken by it” Application of the assessee for condonation of delay

MR.MOHD WASIM,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO -3 (2), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 26/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Aug 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2008-09 Mohd. Wasim Khan, Ito, 3(2), House No. 32, Bhopal बनाम/ Yaseen Mahal, Peergate, Vs. Bhopal (Assessee/ Appellant) (Revenue/ Respondent) Pan: Abdpw7203P Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal C.A. & Shri N. D. Patwa, Adv. Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 09.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 11.08.2023

Section 144

32, Bhopal बनाम/ Yaseen Mahal, Peergate, Vs. Bhopal (Assessee/ Appellant) (Revenue/ Respondent) PAN: ABDPW7203P Assessee by Shri Ashish Goyal C.A. and Shri N. D. Patwa, Adv. Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 09.08.2023 Date of Pronouncement 11.08.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: Feeling aggrieved by appeal-order dated 01.09.2021 passed

MAHESH CHANDRA AGARWAL,BHOPAL vs. CIT(A), DELHI

Appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 176/IND/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshimahesh Chandra Agrawal, Cit(A), बनाम/ Prop. M/S Swarn Pushp Nfac, Vs. Jwellers, Delhi Sarafa Chowk, Indore (Pan:Aavpa8254B) (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Assessee By Shri Gowind Rinwa, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Dr Date Of Hearing 19.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 26.11.2025 आदेश / O R D E R

Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 250Section 253

Section 253 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act” for sake of brevity) before this Tribunal. The assessee is aggrieved by the order bearing Number ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 23/1047981997(1) dated 13.12.2022 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act which is hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned order”. The relevant Assessment Year

RAJESH PRAJAPATI ,UJJAIN vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1) , UJJAIN

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 167/IND/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year:2013-14 Shri Rajesh Prajapati, A.C.I.T., बनाम/ 15, Naliya Bakhal, Circle 2(1), Ujjain Ujjain Vs. (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan: Alnpp5190Q Assessee By Ms.Sonam Khandelwal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 17.07.2023

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80CSection 80DSection 80G

section 253(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, we hereby condone the delay in filing present appeal and proceed to adjudicate on merits. GROUND NO. 1: 7. In this ground, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of Rs. 44,32

MUSTAFA ALI THROUGH GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, AUN ALI OTIAWALA,NEEMUCH vs. ITO, NEEMUCH

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 538/IND/2023[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Indore03 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 144Section 271(1)(c)

32, Honda Showroom, Neemuch (PAN: ANGPA4533K) (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Nisha Lahoti, CA & AR Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 01.04.2024 Date of Pronouncement 03.04.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani: These are three appeals filed by assessee. The ITA Nos. 536 & 537/Ind/2023 challenge two separate appeal-orders, both dated

MUSTAFA ALI THROUGH GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, AUN ALI OTIAWALA,NEEMUCH vs. ITO, NEEMUCH

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 537/IND/2023[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Indore03 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 144Section 271(1)(c)

32, Honda Showroom, Neemuch (PAN: ANGPA4533K) (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Nisha Lahoti, CA & AR Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 01.04.2024 Date of Pronouncement 03.04.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani: These are three appeals filed by assessee. The ITA Nos. 536 & 537/Ind/2023 challenge two separate appeal-orders, both dated

MUSTAFA ALI THROUGH GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, AUN ALI OTIAWALA,NEEMUCH vs. ITO, NEEMUCH

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 536/IND/2023[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Indore03 Apr 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 144Section 271(1)(c)

32, Honda Showroom, Neemuch (PAN: ANGPA4533K) (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Nisha Lahoti, CA & AR Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 01.04.2024 Date of Pronouncement 03.04.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani: These are three appeals filed by assessee. The ITA Nos. 536 & 537/Ind/2023 challenge two separate appeal-orders, both dated

HARE RAM MANDIR TRUST,BHOPAL vs. ITO-EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 769/IND/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 10Section 143(1)Section 154Section 246ASection 250Section 253

32,130/-. As per the Income Expenditure account for AY 2014-15, it has been shown as Rs 10,66,435/-.  Order U/s 143(1) was passed on 02.02.2016 and application for rectification of demand is filed on 01.04.2022 which is beyond the period of 4 years”. 2.5 That amongst others one of the ground for the rejection

HARE RAM MANDIR TRUST,BHOPAL vs. ITO -EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 770/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 10Section 143(1)Section 154Section 246ASection 250Section 253

32,130/-. As per the Income Expenditure account for AY 2014-15, it has been shown as Rs 10,66,435/-.  Order U/s 143(1) was passed on 02.02.2016 and application for rectification of demand is filed on 01.04.2022 which is beyond the period of 4 years”. 2.5 That amongst others one of the ground for the rejection

ACIT(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

ITA 344/IND/2020[1988-89]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2021AY 1988-89

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 132(5)Section 144Section 148

32,536/- 1992-93 28.09.1993 29.09.1993 1,21,47,911/- 6. The Ld. AO has mentioned in the assessment orders that a fire broke out in Room No.316 at Aayakar Bhawan on 25.07.1993 in which certain documents pertaining to the assessee were destroyed. Thereafter a separate panchnama was prepared for the burnt documents and the documents saved from fire

THE ACIT 1 (1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

ITA 347/IND/2020[1991-92]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2021AY 1991-92

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 132(5)Section 144Section 148

32,536/- 1992-93 28.09.1993 29.09.1993 1,21,47,911/- 6. The Ld. AO has mentioned in the assessment orders that a fire broke out in Room No.316 at Aayakar Bhawan on 25.07.1993 in which certain documents pertaining to the assessee were destroyed. Thereafter a separate panchnama was prepared for the burnt documents and the documents saved from fire

ACIT1(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

ITA 346/IND/2020[1990-91]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2021AY 1990-91

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 132(5)Section 144Section 148

32,536/- 1992-93 28.09.1993 29.09.1993 1,21,47,911/- 6. The Ld. AO has mentioned in the assessment orders that a fire broke out in Room No.316 at Aayakar Bhawan on 25.07.1993 in which certain documents pertaining to the assessee were destroyed. Thereafter a separate panchnama was prepared for the burnt documents and the documents saved from fire

ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

ITA 342/IND/2020[1986-87]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2021AY 1986-87

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 132(5)Section 144Section 148

32,536/- 1992-93 28.09.1993 29.09.1993 1,21,47,911/- 6. The Ld. AO has mentioned in the assessment orders that a fire broke out in Room No.316 at Aayakar Bhawan on 25.07.1993 in which certain documents pertaining to the assessee were destroyed. Thereafter a separate panchnama was prepared for the burnt documents and the documents saved from fire

THE ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

ITA 343/IND/2020[1987-88]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2021AY 1987-88

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 132(5)Section 144Section 148

32,536/- 1992-93 28.09.1993 29.09.1993 1,21,47,911/- 6. The Ld. AO has mentioned in the assessment orders that a fire broke out in Room No.316 at Aayakar Bhawan on 25.07.1993 in which certain documents pertaining to the assessee were destroyed. Thereafter a separate panchnama was prepared for the burnt documents and the documents saved from fire

ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

ITA 345/IND/2020[1989-90]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2021AY 1989-90

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 132(5)Section 144Section 148

32,536/- 1992-93 28.09.1993 29.09.1993 1,21,47,911/- 6. The Ld. AO has mentioned in the assessment orders that a fire broke out in Room No.316 at Aayakar Bhawan on 25.07.1993 in which certain documents pertaining to the assessee were destroyed. Thereafter a separate panchnama was prepared for the burnt documents and the documents saved from fire

ACIT 1( 1 ), BHOPAL vs. SHRI ASHOK GOYAL, BHOPAL

Appeal are allowed

ITA 348/IND/2020[1992-93]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Nov 2021AY 1992-93

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 132(5)Section 144Section 148

32,536/- 1992-93 28.09.1993 29.09.1993 1,21,47,911/- 6. The Ld. AO has mentioned in the assessment orders that a fire broke out in Room No.316 at Aayakar Bhawan on 25.07.1993 in which certain documents pertaining to the assessee were destroyed. Thereafter a separate panchnama was prepared for the burnt documents and the documents saved from fire

HASEENA BEGUM,BHOPAL vs. ITO-4(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose, subject

ITA 927/IND/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Apr 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiassessment Year:2011-12 Haseena Begum, Ito-4(1), 32 Yaseen Mahel, Hawa Bhopal बनाम/ Mahal Road Peer Gate Vs. Bhopal (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aiopb2877J Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal & Shri N.D. Patwa, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 15.04.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 17.04.2026

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 253(5)

32 Yaseen Mahel, Hawa Bhopal बनाम/ Mahal Road Peer Gate Vs. Bhopal (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) PAN: AIOPB2877J Assessee by Shri Ashish Goyal & Shri N.D. Patwa, ARs Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 15.04.2026 Date of Pronouncement 17.04.2026 आदेश/ O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: Feeling aggrieved by order of first-appeal dated 17.01.2024 passed