M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

4) read with sections 13(1)(c)(ii) and section 13(3). Violation of provisions of section 13 cannot be a basis for cancellation of registration u/s 12AA. Impugned order cancelling the registration u/s 12AA ought to be quashed. D. Apropos ground no. 7 – payment of excess salary, funds of the charitable trust

CHIRAYU CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradchirayu Charitable Pcit (Central), Foundation,Bhopal Indore Bhopal Highway, Bhaisakhedi, Vs. Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Aaaac3656P Revenue By Shri S.S. Mantri, Cit Appellant By S/Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate, Gagan Tiwari & Piyush Parashar, Advs Date Of Hearing 05.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement .02.2021 O R D E R Per Manish Borad, Am.

trust and, therefore, the provisions of section 12AA(3) are not applicable. Hence the order of PCIT is unlawful and, therefore, be quashed. That on the facts & in the circumstances of the case and in law, the (4) order of learned PCIT u/s.12AA(3) is unlawful because the said order has 10 Chirayu Charitable

M/S SHISHUKUNJ EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,THE SHISHUKUNJ INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, GRAM JHALARIA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX. AAYKAR BHAWAN,

4) of the Act as\nfollows:\nExplanation: For the purposes of this sub-section, the following shall mean\n\"specified violation\",--\na) Where any income derived from property held under trust, wholly or in\npart for charitable

DIVYASDHANA CHARITALLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT (E) CIRCLE , BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed in terms indicated above

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

4(s). (iii) It is further submitted that section 80G(5B) overrides section 80G(5)(ii) as well as Explanation 3 to section 80G and provides that if the expenditure of religious nature does not exceed 5%, the trust shall be deemed to be covered u/s 80G(5). Therefore, the assessee could Page 7 of 12 Divya Sadhana Charitable

DIVYASDHANA CHARITALLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE CIT (E) CIRCLE , BHOPAL

Appeals are allowed in terms indicated above

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

4(s). (iii) It is further submitted that section 80G(5B) overrides section 80G(5)(ii) as well as Explanation 3 to section 80G and provides that if the expenditure of religious nature does not exceed 5%, the trust shall be deemed to be covered u/s 80G(5). Therefore, the assessee could Page 7 of 12 Divya Sadhana Charitable

FAIZAN E BURHANE MILLAT TRUST,JABALPUR vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanifaizan E Burhane Millat Cit(Exemption) Trust Bhopal 181/1, Baitla Colony Vfj Society, Ward Shaheed, Abdul Vs. Hameed, Raza Chowk Milk, Scheme Road, Jabalpur (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaatf8671J Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal & Nd Patwa, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. -Dr Date Of Hearing 13.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.03.2024

charitable and religious are not exclusively meant for a particular religious community. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has further observed that the objects of the said trust do not channel the benefits to any community if not the Dawoodi, Bohra, Page 3 of 18 ITANo.55/Ind/2023 Faizan E Burhane Millat Trust Community and thus would not fall under the provisions

SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBER MURTIPUJAK SUKRAT FUND KAODA COMMITTEE,INDORE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradshri Jain Shwetamber Cit (Exemption) Bhopal Murtipujak Sukrat Fund Vs. Kapda Committee, 11/12, Mahavir Marg, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan Aabts6859G Appellant By Shri Narendra Kumar Jain, Ca Revenue By Smt. Ashima Gupta, Cit Date Of Hearing 15.09.2020 Date Of Pronouncement 29.09.2020 O R D E R Per Manish Borad, Am. This Appeal Is Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Cit

section 12A of Income Tax Act. 4. Brief facts of the case as submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee and as per the statement of facts placed on record are that the assessee trust was formed in the year 1945 as Public charitable

M/S. ARIHANT CHERITABLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE ITO (TDS)-1, INDORE

In the result, we find no force in the ground of the Revenue, hence dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year:2015-16

Charitable Trust Indore /ITANo.909/2019 of tax under section 194J of the Act even when the appellant had paid the said amount in pursuance to a contract and therefore TDS was rightly deducted under section 194C of the Act. 2. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming

CIT(E),BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. SHRI MAHAVIR KUND KUND TRUST, UJJAIN

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

4 of 12 ITA No.838/Ind/2018 & ITANo.340/Ind/2020 carried out by it and accordingly it is registered as public trust under Madhya Pradesh Public Trust Act too. On a query by bench regarding the restrictions placed in the trust-deed as to the manner of worship, etc., the Ld. AR submitted that those restrictions have been put in to abide

MAHAVIR KUND KUND KAHAN TRUST,BARHANPUR vs. CIT(E) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

4 of 12 ITA No.838/Ind/2018 & ITANo.340/Ind/2020 carried out by it and accordingly it is registered as public trust under Madhya Pradesh Public Trust Act too. On a query by bench regarding the restrictions placed in the trust-deed as to the manner of worship, etc., the Ld. AR submitted that those restrictions have been put in to abide

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 11(4) is merely intended to tax income which is not accounted for in the books: it does not operate to charge a disclosed amount which is admittedly expended, for a purpose either charitable or non- charitable, but is disclos as business expenditure and consequently added back in computing the business income. [CIT v Birla Education Trust

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 11(4) is merely intended to tax income which is not accounted for in the books: it does not operate to charge a disclosed amount which is admittedly expended, for a purpose either charitable or non- charitable, but is disclos as business expenditure and consequently added back in computing the business income. [CIT v Birla Education Trust

M/S RAJIV GANDHI PROUDYOGIK VISHWAVIDHALYA,BHOPAL vs. CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: Na (12Aa)

4) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (3), where a trust or an institution has been granted registration under clause (b) of sub-section (1) or has obtained registration at any time under section 12A [as it stood before its amendment by the Finance (No.2) Act, 1996 (33 of 1996)] and subsequently it is noticed that the activities

BISA NEEMA PANCHAYAT BHAWAN TRUST,M.G ROAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) BHOPAL, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaa.Y. : 2023-24 Bisa Neema Panchayat Commissioner Of Income- Bhawan Trust, Tax (Exemption), बनाम/ 285, M.G. Road, Bhopal Vs. Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aactb4287E Assessee By Shri S.S.Deshpande, C.A. & Ar Revenue By Shri V.K. Singh, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 27.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 29.11.2024

4 is dismissed as non-pressed. By means of all other grounds, the assessee has raised a single grievance that the CIT(E) was not justified in rejecting assessee’s application for final registration u/s 12AB. We proceed to adjudicate this grievance in subsequent discussions. Page 7 of 13 Bisa Neema Panchayat Bhawan Trust, Indore. ITA No. 480/Ind/2024

DAWAT E ISLAMI,RAIPUR vs. THE CIT ( EXEMPTION ) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanidawat E Islami Chhttisgarh Cit(Exemption) Sanjay Nagar R D A Plot Raipur Bhopal Vs. Raipur, Chhttisgarh (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aadtd 7213 R Assessee By Shri Ankit Chowksi, Ar Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 01.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22.09.2023

Charitable Trust vs. CIT 246 ITR 452 (Gujarat HC) 5. Indo-German Studies v. DIT (Ex.) Hyderabad 74 taxmann.com 66 (Hyd. Trib.) 4. On the other hand, Ld. DR has submitted that after considering the objects of assesse trust the CIT(E) has pointed out that the assessee trust is created for benefit of particular religious community and further

M/S. M.P. BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT EXCEMPTION , BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed

charitable purposes in accordance\nwith Section 11(1)(a) of the Act. The Gujarat High Court held that "income\nderived from trust property" for the purposes of Section 11(1)(a), must be\ndetermined on commercial principles and in doing so, all outgoings including\noutgoing by way of income tax paid by the assessee-trust must be deducted\nand

NATIONAL LAW INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY ,BHOPAL vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed in terms mentioned above

charitable\npurposes. In other words, it was not permitted to accumulate more than 25\nper cent of its total income. The question has been reconsidered by the Board\nand the correct legal position is explained below.\n2. Section 11(1) provides that subject to the provisions of sections 60 to 63,\n\"the following income shall not be included

HARDA NAGAR BAL VIKAS SAMITI HARDA ,SARSWATI SHISHU MANDIR vs. ITO-1, HARDA, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in terms mentioned above

trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) shall furnish the return of income for the previous year in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (4C) of section 139 within the time allowed under