THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

charitable activities were lauded. It has been claimed by the appellant that the Assessing Officer accepted the nature of work being done by the aforesaid trust which was evident from the assessment order itself regarding the bonafides of the work being carried on had been made anywhere in the body of the order u] s 143(3) / 115BBC. 3.6 During

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

charitable activities were lauded. It has been claimed by the appellant that the Assessing Officer accepted the nature of work being done by the aforesaid trust which was evident from the assessment order itself regarding the bonafides of the work being carried on had been made anywhere in the body of the order u] s 143(3) / 115BBC. 3.6 During

SHRI MANUEL MEDA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, Cross Objection by the assessee in CO

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradit(Ss)A No.89/Ind/2016 Assessment Year: 2006-07 Acit 1(1) M/S. L.N. Gupta Mathur Vaishya बनाम/ Charitable Trust Bhopal Vs. E-1/55, Arera Colony, Bhopal (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan: Aaatl4820E

section 153C is without jurisdiction and the same is bad in law.” 4. In the case of another Assessee namely Kasturi Devi Ramkumar Vaishya Charitable Trust

M/S TRUBA EDUCATION SOCIETY ,BHOPAL vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

sections (1)\nand (2), the Board or other income-tax authority authorised by it\nmay have regard to any one or more of the following criteria, namely:-\n(a) territorial area;\n(b) persons or classes of persons;\n(c) incomes or classes of income; and\n(d) cases or classes of cases.\nTherefore, in furtherance of the said provisions

M/S AD-MANUM FINANCE LTD.,INDORE vs. THEDCIT 1(1) , INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

153C is misplaced and cannot be accepted. 4.3 In view of the above it is held that the reopening proceedings were properly and validly initiated and the objections raised by the appellant have not been found acceptable as such rejected. Therefore, this ground of appeal is dismissed. Ground Nos. 2 & 3: The second ground of appeal has 5. been raised

THE DCIT1(1), INDORE vs. M/S. AVILABLE FINANCE LTD., INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

153C is misplaced and cannot be accepted. 4.3 In view of the above it is held that the reopening proceedings were properly and validly initiated and the objections raised by the appellant have not been found acceptable as such rejected. Therefore, this ground of appeal is dismissed. Ground Nos. 2 & 3: The second ground of appeal has 5. been raised

DY. CIT -1(1), INDORE vs. M/S. AGRAWAL TRANSPORT CORPORATION (P) LTD., INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2010-11

153C is misplaced and cannot be accepted. 4.3 In view of the above it is held that the reopening proceedings were properly and validly initiated and the objections raised by the appellant have not been found acceptable as such rejected. Therefore, this ground of appeal is dismissed. Ground Nos. 2 & 3: The second ground of appeal has 5. been raised

M/S. DEVI SHAKUNTALA THKARAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. PR CIT ,CENTRAL, BHOPAL

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court)

trust granted u/s.12AA w.e.f. 01.04.2011, hence the order of the learned PCIT u/s.12AA be kindly cancelled. That on the facts & in the circumstances of the case and (6) in law, the findings of the learned PCIT that the income of the institution was being applied directly/indirectly for the benefit of trustees are wholly wrong, opposed to facts, injudicious and unlawful