M/S SHREE JAIRAM EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. ACIT CENTRAL-II, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

2) Whether the activities carried out are genuine in nature. To satisfy these twin conditions, CIT(Exemption) may call for such information as may be required. At the time of grant of registration to a trust or institution, the power of the CIT(Exemption) is limited to examination whether trust's objects are charitable or not and trust’s activities

FAIZAN E BURHANE MILLAT TRUST,JABALPUR vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanifaizan E Burhane Millat Cit(Exemption) Trust Bhopal 181/1, Baitla Colony Vfj Society, Ward Shaheed, Abdul Vs. Hameed, Raza Chowk Milk, Scheme Road, Jabalpur (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaatf8671J Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal & Nd Patwa, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. -Dr Date Of Hearing 13.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.03.2024

2 of 18 ITANo.55/Ind/2023 Faizan E Burhane Millat Trust (Roza) & Pilgrimage (hajj). He has referred to the objects of the assessee trust and submitted that all these objects clearly manifested that the assessee is religious trust and therefore, the provision of section 13(1)(b) of the Act are not applicable in the case of the assessee. The objects

M/S H.K. KALCHURI EDUCATION TRUST,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 2(1), BHOPAL

Appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia, Hon’Ble & Shri O.P. Meena, Hon’Blea.Y. 2011-12 H.K. Kalchuri Education Trust, Bhopal Pan – Aaath 3738 E ::: Appellant

section 13(1)(c)(ii) r.w.s. 13(2)(b) r.w.s. 13(3) and thus the assessee is fully eligible for exemption u/s.11 & 12 of the I.T. Act. H.K. Kalchuri Education Trust and others 8. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the following additions/disallowances. Such additions/disallowances

M/S JAI NARAIN SHIKSHA SAMITI,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 2(1), BHOPAL

Appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia, Hon’Ble & Shri O.P. Meena, Hon’Blea.Y. 2011-12 H.K. Kalchuri Education Trust, Bhopal Pan – Aaath 3738 E ::: Appellant

section 13(1)(c)(ii) r.w.s. 13(2)(b) r.w.s. 13(3) and thus the assessee is fully eligible for exemption u/s.11 & 12 of the I.T. Act. H.K. Kalchuri Education Trust and others 8. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the following additions/disallowances. Such additions/disallowances

M/S HAI HAY KSHATRIYA EDUCATION SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 2(1), BHOPAL

Appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia, Hon’Ble & Shri O.P. Meena, Hon’Blea.Y. 2011-12 H.K. Kalchuri Education Trust, Bhopal Pan – Aaath 3738 E ::: Appellant

section 13(1)(c)(ii) r.w.s. 13(2)(b) r.w.s. 13(3) and thus the assessee is fully eligible for exemption u/s.11 & 12 of the I.T. Act. H.K. Kalchuri Education Trust and others 8. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the following additions/disallowances. Such additions/disallowances

M/S RISHIRAJ MEMORIAL EDUCATION & WELFARE SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 2(1), BHOPAL

Appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia, Hon’Ble & Shri O.P. Meena, Hon’Blea.Y. 2011-12 H.K. Kalchuri Education Trust, Bhopal Pan – Aaath 3738 E ::: Appellant

section 13(1)(c)(ii) r.w.s. 13(2)(b) r.w.s. 13(3) and thus the assessee is fully eligible for exemption u/s.11 & 12 of the I.T. Act. H.K. Kalchuri Education Trust and others 8. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the following additions/disallowances. Such additions/disallowances

CHIRAYU CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,BHOPAL vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradchirayu Charitable Pcit (Central), Foundation,Bhopal Indore Bhopal Highway, Bhaisakhedi, Vs. Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Aaaac3656P Revenue By Shri S.S. Mantri, Cit Appellant By S/Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate, Gagan Tiwari & Piyush Parashar, Advs Date Of Hearing 05.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement .02.2021 O R D E R Per Manish Borad, Am.

2(1), Mumbai) of Zagdu Singh Charitable Trust for confirmation of donation given to the assessee. This letter was issued by the A.O. of the Zagdu Singh Charitable Trust in connection with the assessment proceedings pending for A.Y. 2014-15 of the said trust. Chirayu Charitable Foundation (iv) Copy of reply of the assessee in compliance to notice

M/S TRUBA EDUCATION SOCIETY ,BHOPAL vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Udayan Das Gupta

charitable activity as per the provisions of section 2(15) of the Act, and there is no change in the aforesaid activity and hence withdrawal of registration u/s.12AB(4) of the Act on the ground that the activities of the trust are not in accordance with the objects of the trust without pointing any such "specified violations" are wholly erroneous

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

13 MP Madhyam charitable activity is anti-thesis of activity undertaken with profit motive or activity undertaken on sound or recognized business principles. Charity is driven by altruism and desire to serve others, though element of self-preservation may be present. For charity, benevolence should be omnipresent and demonstrable but it is not equivalent to self-sacrifice and abnegation

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT, BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

13 MP Madhyam charitable activity is anti-thesis of activity undertaken with profit motive or activity undertaken on sound or recognized business principles. Charity is driven by altruism and desire to serve others, though element of self-preservation may be present. For charity, benevolence should be omnipresent and demonstrable but it is not equivalent to self-sacrifice and abnegation

BISA NEEMA PANCHAYAT BHAWAN TRUST,M.G ROAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) BHOPAL, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaa.Y. : 2023-24 Bisa Neema Panchayat Commissioner Of Income- Bhawan Trust, Tax (Exemption), बनाम/ 285, M.G. Road, Bhopal Vs. Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aactb4287E Assessee By Shri S.S.Deshpande, C.A. & Ar Revenue By Shri V.K. Singh, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 27.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 29.11.2024

13 Bisa Neema Panchayat Bhawan Trust, Indore. ITA No. 480/Ind/2024 - A.Y. 2023-24 Para 3 of impugned order re-produced above, clearly mentions that the trust is also engaged in religious objects/activities apart from various charitable objects/activities [Page 26 of Paper-Book]. Further, Para 2 of the letter filed by assessee-trust to CIT(E) during proceeding clearly mentions

CIT(E),BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. SHRI MAHAVIR KUND KUND TRUST, UJJAIN

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

2: At the outset we make it clear that both sides agree on the nature of assessee-trust i.e. it is a religious-trust and neither a charitable trust nor a charitable-cum-religious trust. This fact is clearly borne out by the application in Form No. 10A and also neither disputed

MAHAVIR KUND KUND KAHAN TRUST,BARHANPUR vs. CIT(E) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

2: At the outset we make it clear that both sides agree on the nature of assessee-trust i.e. it is a religious-trust and neither a charitable trust nor a charitable-cum-religious trust. This fact is clearly borne out by the application in Form No. 10A and also neither disputed

M/S M.P. MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of assessee for A

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

charitable purpose.” 5.4 This has been reiterated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court while summing up the conclusions in para 253 in clause A & E as under: “A. General test under section 2(15) A.1. It is clarified that an assessee advancing general public utility cannot engage itself in any trade, commerce or business, or provide service in relation thereto

M.P.MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of assessee for A

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

charitable purpose.” 5.4 This has been reiterated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court while summing up the conclusions in para 253 in clause A & E as under: “A. General test under section 2(15) A.1. It is clarified that an assessee advancing general public utility cannot engage itself in any trade, commerce or business, or provide service in relation thereto

M.P.MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of assessee for A

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

charitable purpose.” 5.4 This has been reiterated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court while summing up the conclusions in para 253 in clause A & E as under: “A. General test under section 2(15) A.1. It is clarified that an assessee advancing general public utility cannot engage itself in any trade, commerce or business, or provide service in relation thereto

M.P.MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of assessee for A

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

charitable purpose.” 5.4 This has been reiterated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court while summing up the conclusions in para 253 in clause A & E as under: “A. General test under section 2(15) A.1. It is clarified that an assessee advancing general public utility cannot engage itself in any trade, commerce or business, or provide service in relation thereto

M/S. ARIHANT CHERITABLE TRUST,INDORE vs. THE ITO (TDS)-1, INDORE

In the result, we find no force in the ground of the Revenue, hence dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year:2015-16

Charitable Trust Indore /ITANo.909/2019 1.9.5] The Hon’ble ITAT Mumbai Bench ‘D’ in the case of M/s Ruby Macons Ltd vs DCIT, Mumbai [ITA No. 4056/Mum/2008] has categorically held that: [Page No. 68-76] “11. We have carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the record. We have also carefully perused the case law relied upon by the learned Counsel