DAWAT E ISLAMI,RAIPUR vs. THE CIT ( EXEMPTION ) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanidawat E Islami Chhttisgarh Cit(Exemption) Sanjay Nagar R D A Plot Raipur Bhopal Vs. Raipur, Chhttisgarh (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aadtd 7213 R Assessee By Shri Ankit Chowksi, Ar Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 01.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22.09.2023

12 by the assesse. Thus, the Ld. AR has submitted that the provisions of section 13(1)(b) are not applicable in the case of the assesse which is purely religious trust. The CIT(E) itself has accepted the fact that the assesse is a public religious trust and accepted some of the objects as religious but other objects

AATMA PRAKASH MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniaatma Prakash Mental Cit (Exemption), Health Foundation, Bhopal बनाम/ 738, Nehru Nagar, Vs. Indore. (Appellant/Assessee) (Respondent/Revenue) Pan: Aaoca9170A Assessee By Shri Apurva Mehta & Shri Rajesh Mehta, Ars Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 16.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.05.2024

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 122A of the Act, till 30.09.2023 where the due date for making such application has expired prior to such date. 15. However, in earlier Circular 8/2022, which was issued on 31.03.2022 the CBDT has given instruction about approval 80G(5) of the Act, which is reproduced below: “1. On consideration of difficulties

BALAJI GAU SANRAKSHAN SANSTHAN,VIDISHA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

trust or institution has been excluded from the total income on account of applicability of sub-clause (iv )or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10, or section 11 or section 12, for any previous year ending on or before the date of such application, at any time after

DISHA EDUCATION SOCIETY,RAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

In the result, both appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A, shall,— (a) where the application is made under sub-clause (i) of the Page 9 of 14 ITA No.164 & 165/Ind/2023 Disha Education Society Page 10 of 14 said clause, pass an order in writing registering the trust or institution for a period of five years; (b) where the application is made under

THE NIMAR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KHANDWA vs. THE EXEMPTION CIRCLE, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanithe Nimar Educational Society Cit(E) Harsud Road, Civil Lines Bhopal Vs. East Nimar, Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aabtt 1409 K Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrwal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 14.06.2023

ac)(i) of the Act which means that the registration is granted in the category where the assessee was already granted registration u/s 12A of the Act. Therefore, this subsequent registration granted by the competent authority corroborates the claim of the assessee that the assessee was already granted registration. Since this issue is neither adjudicated

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,INDORE vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION ,CIRCIE, BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanisection 12Ab Indore Development Cit-(Exemption) Authority, Bhopal Vs. Ida Building, 7, Race Course Road, Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaaji 0103 J Assessee By S/Sh. Anil Kamal Garg & Arpit Gaur, Cas Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 13.12.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 24.01.2024

12(AC)(vi) of the Act, on an earlier occasion. 2. That, the learned CIT(E) grossly erred, both on facts and I law, in rejecting the application of the Appellant Authority without assigning any cogent reason for such rejection and without passing a Speaking Order. 3a).That, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned