BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 237clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai286Delhi127Chandigarh85Jaipur78Bangalore42Chennai39Hyderabad29Kolkata22Raipur21Ahmedabad19Visakhapatnam17Pune16Nagpur12Surat11Amritsar9Lucknow9Indore6Ranchi5Guwahati5Patna5Varanasi5Jodhpur4Cochin3Dehradun2Rajkot2Allahabad1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 14812Addition to Income5Section 693Section 143(3)3Section 1473Section 1392Section 1192Section 144C2Long Term Capital Gains2

PRADEEP PINJANI,BHOPAL vs. ITO-1(2), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed as mentioned above

ITA 556/IND/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jan 2025AY 2016-17
Section 143(3)Section 54F

capital gain\ndeclared by assessee from those properties in this manner is not valid and\nnot sustainable.\n\n13. Ld. AR relied upon a decision of ITAT, Delhi Bench in Urban\nImprovement Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. ITO-Ward 27(2), Delhi, ITA No.\n7496/Del/2019 wherein the ITAT has deleted the addition made by\nassessing authority u/s 43CA beyond the scope

NILIMA KOTHARI,INDORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSTT. CENTRE, INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed as per terms indicated above

ITA 259/IND/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manish Boradsmt. Neelima Kothari, Income Tax Officer, 601, N.R.K. Villas, Delhi Vs. 22/2 Manoramaganj, Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Adnpk7832J Assessee By Shri S.S. Deshpande, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 08.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.09.2024

Disallowance2
Section 10(38)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68

capital gain. 5. I have heard rival submissions and perused the record placed before us and also carefully going through decisions and judgments referred and relied by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. Before me the assessee has raised three fold legal arguments. Firstly, the notice u/s 148 of the Act is time barred secondly, no valid approval as provided

MR. CHHITAR SINGH BHIKAJI,KHANDWA vs. ITO-1 KHANDWA, KHANDWA

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 653/IND/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Apr 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanishri Chhitar Singh Bhikaji Ito-1 Village-Sihada Khandwa Vs. Tah.- Khandwa Dist- Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Frhps 0744 A Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 19.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 20.04.2023

Section 139Section 148Section 2(14)Section 69

capital gains was arise as has rightly been treated by A.O. But so far as consideration of Rs. 28,00,000/- the learned A.O. is not agreeing on facts that the sum of Rs. 28,00,000/- received as sale consideration of above mentioned rural agricultural land and make an addition under section 69 of the act. 4. That

SEEMA LUNAWAT,RATLAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MANDSAUR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 300/IND/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2025AY 2011-12
Section 139Section 147Section 148

Capital Market Ltd and India\nInfoline Limited and submitted that she had shown all gain from trading of\nshare and income from Interest and others sources in the ITR filed for the A.Y.\n2011-12. The assessee furnished the statement of bank account of HDFC\nBank Ltd and Axis Bank Ltd to substantiate her trading with the above\nbroker companies

SHRI MAYUR BANSAL,GWALIOR vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the revenue in IT(SS)ANo

ITA 81/IND/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 119Section 153ASection 156

capital gain." 2. "On the fact and in the Circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 34,00,000/- made by AO for A.Y. 2014-15 on account of undisclosed income ofundisclosed investment." 3. "On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition

CUMMINS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA (P) LTD.,DEWAS vs. ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), UJJAIN

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed

ITA 982/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanicommins Technologies India Acit, Circle -1(1) Private Limited Ujjain Vs. Industrial Area No.2, A.B. Road, M.P. (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aabct2018B Assessee By Shri Ketan Ved & Pinkesh Vakharia Ars Revenue By Ms. Simran Bhullar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 29.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30.11.2023

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)

capital work-fin-progress) and no depreciation was claimed against this cost in the return of income filed by the Assessee for the year under consideration. 5.4 On the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the learned AO / T * PO pursuant to the directions of Hon'ble DRP, has erred by not taking cognizance