SHRI KRISHNA MOHAN CHOURSIYA, RAJGARH vs. ITO, RAJGARH

In the result, the assessee’s appeal i

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2014-15

D E R PER MANISH BORAD, A.M The above captioned appeal filed at the instance of the Assessee for Assessment Year 2014-15 is directed against the ITA No.853 of 2017 2 Krishna Mohan Chourasia order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) [in short ‘Ld. CIT(A)’], Ujjain dated 01.09.2017 which is arising out of the order

SHRI SUNIL SHASRMA,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO, 3(2), BHOPAL

In the result, Assessee’s appeal ITANo

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2010-11

D E R PER MANISH BORAD, A.M.: The above captioned appeal filed at the instance of the Assessee for Assessment Year 2010-11 is directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) (in short ‘Ld. CIT]-2 Bhopal dated 05.03.2020 which is arising out of the order u/s Shri Sunil sharma 143(3) of the Income

IMRAN KHAN,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO2 (2), BHYOPAL

In the result the issue No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manish Boradimran Khan Ito 2(2) S/O Sh. Gulab Khan H. No.35 Bhopal Village-Inayatpura Kolar Board, Vs. Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Ckqpk5708M Assessee By Shri Niranjan Purandar Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 02.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 11.01.2024

D E R Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM: This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order dated 28.02.2023 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), for assessment year 2013-14. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1.That on the facts & in the circumstances of the case and in law, the respondent erred

PRADEEP PINJANI,BHOPAL vs. ITO-1(2), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed as mentioned above

17,111/-) without giving\nproper opportunity for production/verification of evidences, related therewith.\n\n4. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) was\nnot justified to confirm the addition made by Ld. AO by ignoring the claim for\nloss from business amounting to Rs 6,29,230/- which is duly supported by\nAudited

AATMA PRAKASH MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniaatma Prakash Mental Cit (Exemption), Health Foundation, Bhopal बनाम/ 738, Nehru Nagar, Vs. Indore. (Appellant/Assessee) (Respondent/Revenue) Pan: Aaoca9170A Assessee By Shri Apurva Mehta & Shri Rajesh Mehta, Ars Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 16.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.05.2024

D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.10.2023 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Exemption), Bhopal [“CIT(E)”] by which the assessee’s application for grant of final approval u/s 80G(5) of Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected and the provisional approval u/s 80G(5) granted earlier

MOHANLAL KHANDELWAL,INDORE vs. THE ITO-4(1), INDORE

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by different

Bench: Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

D E R PER BENCH:- The bunch of appeals filed by the assessee(s) are directed against separate orders of different dates passed by the Ld. CIT(A)- II, Indore u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) confirming the addition made by the Ld. A.O upon disallowing exemption

SMT. SANDHYA KHANDELWAL,INDORE vs. ITO 4(3), INDORE

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by different

Bench: Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

D E R PER BENCH:- The bunch of appeals filed by the assessee(s) are directed against separate orders of different dates passed by the Ld. CIT(A)- II, Indore u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) confirming the addition made by the Ld. A.O upon disallowing exemption

SMT. RUKMANI KHANDELWAL,INDORE vs. ITO-4(3), INDORE

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by different

Bench: Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

D E R PER BENCH:- The bunch of appeals filed by the assessee(s) are directed against separate orders of different dates passed by the Ld. CIT(A)- II, Indore u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) confirming the addition made by the Ld. A.O upon disallowing exemption

RADHESHYAM KHANDELWAL,INDORE vs. ACIT4(1), INDORE

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by different

Bench: Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

D E R PER BENCH:- The bunch of appeals filed by the assessee(s) are directed against separate orders of different dates passed by the Ld. CIT(A)- II, Indore u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) confirming the addition made by the Ld. A.O upon disallowing exemption

SHRI SURESH KHANDELWAL,INDORE vs. THE ITO-4(1), INDORE

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by different

Bench: Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

D E R PER BENCH:- The bunch of appeals filed by the assessee(s) are directed against separate orders of different dates passed by the Ld. CIT(A)- II, Indore u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “The Act”) confirming the addition made by the Ld. A.O upon disallowing exemption

THE DCIT1(1), INDORE vs. SHRI RAVI ARORA, INDORE

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year:2011-12 Dcit-5(1), Shri Ravi Arora, Indore 1007, Khatiwala Tank, बनाम/ 236, Indraprasth Tower, 6, M.G. Road, Vs. Indore. (Revenue / Appellant) (Assessee / Respondent) Pan: Agdpa8921H Assessee By Shri Yash Kukreja, Ca & Shri Hitesh Chimnani, Adv & Ld. Ars Revenue By Shri P.K.Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 04.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.07.2023

D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: Feeling aggrieved by appeal-order dated 31.01.2020 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-II, Indore [“Ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 25.02.2014 passed by Dy. CIT, Circle 5(1), Indore, [“Ld. AO”] u/s 143(3) of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year

ANKUR AGRAWAL,INDORE vs. ITO-5(1), INDORE

In the result, all three appeals of two assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

D E R Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM: These are three appeals filed by the related assesses (mother & son ) out of which two appeals are filed by the mother for assessment Page 1 of 17 ITA Nos.215 & others Ind/2019 Sheela Agarwal and Ankur Agarwal Page 2 of 17 years 2014-15 & 2015-16 and one appeal

SMT. SHEELA AGRAWAL,INDORE vs. ITO-5(5), INDORE

In the result, all three appeals of two assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

D E R Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM: These are three appeals filed by the related assesses (mother & son ) out of which two appeals are filed by the mother for assessment Page 1 of 17 ITA Nos.215 & others Ind/2019 Sheela Agarwal and Ankur Agarwal Page 2 of 17 years 2014-15 & 2015-16 and one appeal

SMT. SHEELA AGRAWAL,INDORE vs. ITO-5(5), INDORE

In the result, all three appeals of two assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

D E R Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM: These are three appeals filed by the related assesses (mother & son ) out of which two appeals are filed by the mother for assessment Page 1 of 17 ITA Nos.215 & others Ind/2019 Sheela Agarwal and Ankur Agarwal Page 2 of 17 years 2014-15 & 2015-16 and one appeal

GOVIND HARINARAYAN AGRAWAL HUF,INDORE vs. I T O 2(1), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

D E R PER MANISH BORAD, A.M The above captioned appeals filed at the instance of the assessee(s) are directed against the orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-II (in short ‘Ld. CIT], Indore dated 28.02.2019 and 31.08.2020 which are arising out of the order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961(In short

MANISH GOVIND AGRAWAL HUF,INDORE vs. I T O 2(1), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

D E R PER MANISH BORAD, A.M The above captioned appeals filed at the instance of the assessee(s) are directed against the orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-II (in short ‘Ld. CIT], Indore dated 28.02.2019 and 31.08.2020 which are arising out of the order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961(In short

SHIV NARAYAN SHARMA,INDORE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 3(1), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

D E R PER MANISH BORAD, A.M The above captioned appeals filed at the instance of the assessee(s) are directed against the orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-II (in short ‘Ld. CIT], Indore dated 28.02.2019 and 31.08.2020 which are arising out of the order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961(In short

PRAYANK JAIN,INDORE vs. ACIT5(1), INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2014-15

D E R PER MANISH BORAD, A.M The above captioned appeals filed at the instance of the assessee(s) are directed against the orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-II (in short ‘Ld. CIT], Indore dated 28.02.2019 and 31.08.2020 which are arising out of the order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961(In short