BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “capital gains”+ Section 111Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai194Delhi43Kolkata27Bangalore13Chennai12Ahmedabad11Pune10Indore9Hyderabad6Jaipur5Surat4Nagpur3Rajkot2Telangana1Karnataka1Lucknow1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 6814Section 111A9Section 143(3)9Section 87A8Short Term Capital Gains8Addition to Income7Section 10(38)5Section 1125Section 1474Long Term Capital Gains

KANHAIYA LAL PANCHAL,RATLAM vs. BPL-W-(91)(95), RATLAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 702/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 Jan 2026AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiassessment Year:2024-25 Kanhaiya Lal Panchal, Bpl-W-(91)(95) 1, Jadwasa Kala, बनाम/ Ratlam Vs. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aqrpp0055D Assessee By Shri Kaide Kangsawala, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 16.01.2026

Section 111ASection 112Section 112ASection 115BSection 143(1)Section 154Section 3(6)Section 81Section 87A

capital gains taxable under that section exceeding Rs.1 lakh. No such exclusion is provided either in section 111A or in section

4
Section 271(1)(c)3
Business Income3

SHRI SHARAD AGRAWAL,INDORE vs. THE JCIT RANGE-4, INDORE

In the result, all these three appeals of the Assessees are partly allowed

ITA 153/IND/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year : 2009-10

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Capital Gain earned of Rs.60,86,999/- on sale of Mutual Funds/shares as business income and consequently taxed the 2 Sharad Agrawal & Rakesh Agrawal above profit at usual rate of tax instead of 15% as per provided under section 111A

SHRI PRADEEP MAHESHWARI HUF,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 3(1), INDORE

In the result I.T.A.No.315/Ind/2012& I

ITA 53/IND/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Oct 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68

Capital Gain from sale of listed equity shares as per the provisions of Section 111A of the I.T Act. 21. As far as Ground

SMT. ANNAPURNA MAHESHWARI,INDORE vs. THE ACIT, 4(1), INDORE

In the result I.T.A.No.315/Ind/2012& I

ITA 315/IND/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Oct 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68

Capital Gain from sale of listed equity shares as per the provisions of Section 111A of the I.T Act. 21. As far as Ground

SMT. ANNAPURNA MAHESHWARI,INDORE vs. THE ITO-4(1), INDORE

In the result I.T.A.No.315/Ind/2012& I

ITA 252/IND/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68

Capital Gain from sale of listed equity shares as per the provisions of Section 111A of the I.T Act. 21. As far as Ground

DCIT-1(1), BHOPAL vs. SHRI PRAKASH BHOJWANI, BHOPAL

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 172/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2010-11 Dy. Cit, Shri Prakash Bhojwani, 1(1), H.No. 7, Parika Phase-I, Bhopal Walmi Road, बनाम/ Chuna Bhatti, Vs. Bhopal (Revenue / Respondent) (Assessee / Appellant) Pan: Abvpb 8825 E Assessee By Shri Ashish Goyal & Shri N.D. Patwa, Ars Revenue By Shri Harshit Bari, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 02.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 02.01.2024

Section 111ASection 111USection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 28

section 43(5). The remaining transactions have resulted in short term capital gain. Therefore, the AO’s action in treating the entire short term capital of Rs. 57,28,867/- as business income was incorrect, unjustified and arbitrary. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the amount of Rs. 7,52,383/- only pertaining to the intraday sale

SARITA BAGDI ,INDORE vs. THE ITO WARD-4(1), INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 May 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royassessment Year 2011-12

Section 10(38)Section 131Section 143(3)

Section 10(38) of the Act but since the identity of broker is in dispute the alleged transaction needs to be examined with the period of holding of equity shares in the Demat account of the assessee. As the identity of seller is in doubt and Smt. Sarita Bagdi 9000 equity shares are held in the Demat account for less

SHRI OM PRAKASH PHATANDAS PANJWANI,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 1(2), INDORE

In the result Ground No. 1 to 6 of the assessee’s appeal are allowed

ITA 968/IND/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore19 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2008-09

Section 111ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

111A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 4. Because on facts and in circumstances of the case, both Ld. Assessing Officer and ld. CIT(A) has erred in going into undue considerations and making baseless observations. 5. Because on facts and in circumstances of the case, no attention was given to the submissions made by the assessee either

SHRI RAKESH AGRAWAL,INDORE vs. ITO-4(4), INDORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 478/IND/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore12 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Rakesh Agrawal, Ito-4(4) बनाम/ 36, Teli Bakhal, Malharganj, Indore Vs. Indore (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Adzpa0506H Appellant By Shri Prakash Jain & Smt. Shreya Jain, Ars Revenue By Shri Puneet Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.12.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 12.12.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manish Borad, A.M: This Appeal At The Instance Of Assessee Pertaining To A.Y. 2010-11 Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-Ii, Indore, (In Short ‘Cit’), Dated 11.03.2019 Which Is Arising Out Of The Order U/S 274/271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act 1961(Hereinafter Called As The ‘Act’) Framed On 27.03.2018 By Ito- 4(4), Indore. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 111ASection 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

Capital Gain for tax at Rs. 63,99,568/- which was earned from redemption of mutual funds after paying security transaction tax. The assessee paid 15% tax under section 111A