BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

26 results for “TDS”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,021Mumbai794Chennai353Bangalore282Kolkata146Karnataka120Ahmedabad98Jaipur46Chandigarh31Raipur30Dehradun26Hyderabad26Indore26Visakhapatnam19Rajkot17Lucknow13Pune12Nagpur8Cochin8Guwahati7Cuttack7Panaji6Amritsar6SC5Telangana5Jodhpur5Agra4Varanasi4Jabalpur3Surat3Uttarakhand2Patna1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)35Section 143(3)33Section 194H20Section 19516TDS15Section 194J14Section 153A12Section 6811Deduction11Addition to Income

M/S. BIRLA CORPORATION LTD., UNIT SATNA CEMENT WORKS,SATNA vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

In the result, Assessee’s appeals

ITA 34/IND/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Jan 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Section 143(3)Section 5(2)(b)

permanent establishment of the foreign suppliers in India as per the relevant provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. (iii) In doing so, the Ld. CIT(A) ignored the fact that the appellant had deducted TDS

M/S. BIRLA CORPORATION LTD., UNIT SATNA CEMENT WORKS,SATNA vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

In the result, Assessee’s appeals

ITA 33/IND/2020[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Indore28 Jan 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing

Showing 1–20 of 26 · Page 1 of 2

9
Double Taxation/DTAA7
Section 143(2)6
Section 143(3)Section 5(2)(b)

permanent establishment of the foreign suppliers in India as per the relevant provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. (iii) In doing so, the Ld. CIT(A) ignored the fact that the appellant had deducted TDS

ITO 2(5), INDORE vs. M/S I PARADISE INFOMEDIA P LTD., INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 813/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Nov 2022

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.D.RFor Respondent: Shri Santosh Deshmukh & Shri
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 5

permanent establishment in India, the income earned by these entities are not chargeable to tax and therefore, no requirement of making TDS

ACIT 2 (1), INDORE vs. M/S JILA INDUSTRIES LTD, DHAR

In the result this appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 806/IND/2018[10-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Feb 2022

Bench: Ms.Suchitra R.Kamble & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyanivirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2010-11 Acit-2(1), Indore M/S. Jiji Industries Ltd., (Formerly Known As बनाम/ Krishna Profiles Pvt. Ltd.), Vs. Plot No.316, Sejwaya, Billod, Dhar (Mp) (Appellant) (Respondent ) P.A.N. - Aacck 1383 M Revenue By Shri P.K. Mitra, Cit-Dr Respondent By Shri S.S. Deshpande, Ca Date Of Hearing: 02.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 25.02.2022

Section 143(3)

TDS on foreign payments not chargeable to tax in India. 5.2.4 The above person to whom payments of commission made have presence in UAE. In this case the aforesaid person has no permanent establishment

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (TDS), INDORE

Appeals are allowed

ITA 111/IND/2015[2013-14 (Quarter 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 194Section 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)

established in various cases, involving the issue of liability of deduction of TDS us 194J for payments to other telecom companies for interconnect charges/access/port charges for reaming and data link that no human intervention was Page 14 of 55 [[[ ITA No. 109 to 111/Ind/2023 – AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2013-14 M/s Idea Cellular Ltd., Indore. involved in the interconnect

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (TDS), INDORE

Appeals are allowed

ITA 109/IND/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 194Section 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)

established in various cases, involving the issue of liability of deduction of TDS us 194J for payments to other telecom companies for interconnect charges/access/port charges for reaming and data link that no human intervention was Page 14 of 55 [[[ ITA No. 109 to 111/Ind/2023 – AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2013-14 M/s Idea Cellular Ltd., Indore. involved in the interconnect

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (TDS), INDORE

Appeals are allowed

ITA 110/IND/2015[2013-14 (for first three quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 194Section 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)

established in various cases, involving the issue of liability of deduction of TDS us 194J for payments to other telecom companies for interconnect charges/access/port charges for reaming and data link that no human intervention was Page 14 of 55 [[[ ITA No. 109 to 111/Ind/2023 – AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2013-14 M/s Idea Cellular Ltd., Indore. involved in the interconnect

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. DCIT TDS, INDORE

ITA 265/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Apr 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S Vodafone Idea Ltd. Cit (Tds), बनाम/ (Formerly M/S Idea Bhopal Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) M/S Vodafone Idea Ltd. Dcit/Jcit (Tds), बनाम/ (Formerly M/S Idea Indore Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent)

Section 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 254(2)Section 263

established in various cases, involving the issue of liability of deduction of TDS us 194J for payments to other telecom companies for interconnect charges/access/port charges for reaming and data link that no human intervention was involved in the interconnect whether it was for data link or roaming, the charges paid could not be held to be in the nature

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE CIT (TDS), BHOPAL

ITA 415/IND/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Apr 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S Vodafone Idea Ltd. Cit (Tds), बनाम/ (Formerly M/S Idea Bhopal Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) M/S Vodafone Idea Ltd. Dcit/Jcit (Tds), बनाम/ (Formerly M/S Idea Indore Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent)

Section 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 254(2)Section 263

established in various cases, involving the issue of liability of deduction of TDS us 194J for payments to other telecom companies for interconnect charges/access/port charges for reaming and data link that no human intervention was involved in the interconnect whether it was for data link or roaming, the charges paid could not be held to be in the nature

M/S TESLA TRANSFORMERS ,BHOPAL vs. ITO(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, BHOPAL

In the result, Ground Numbers 1 to 4 of assessee’s appeal are dismissed

ITA 100/IND/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Nov 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Anil Khabya, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. D.R
Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 9

Permanent Establishment of non-resident in India: The first issue for consideration before us is whether in the instant set of facts, it can be held that the non-resident companies have business connection/permanent establishment in India on account of the activities carried out by its agents in India. The learned counsel for the assessee has primarily relied upon

MAAN ALUMINIUM LTD.,PITHAMPUR vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

ITA 6/IND/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2015-16 Maan Aluminium Ltd. Ito (It & Tp), 427, Orbit Mall, Bhopal बनाम/ 4Th Floor, Ab Road, Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Pan: Aapcm 0088 C / Tan: Bplm 07361 E Assessee By Shri Sudhir Padliya, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.03.2023

Section 195Section 201(1)Section 9Section 90(4)

Permanent-Establishment (“PE”) in terms of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAA) which obligated the assessee to deduct TDS u/s 195 but the assessee

PERMALI WALLACE PVT. LTD,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

ITA 551/IND/2018[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Nov 2023

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 195Section 195rSection 201(1)Section 271CSection 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

Permanent-Establishment[“PE”] in terms of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements [“DTAA”], which obligated the assessee to deduct TDS u/s 195read

PERMALI WALLACE PVT. LTD,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

ITA 550/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Nov 2023

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 195Section 195rSection 201(1)Section 271CSection 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

Permanent-Establishment[“PE”] in terms of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements [“DTAA”], which obligated the assessee to deduct TDS u/s 195read

PERMALI WALLACE PVT. LTD,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

ITA 552/IND/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 195Section 195rSection 201(1)Section 271CSection 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

Permanent-Establishment[“PE”] in terms of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements [“DTAA”], which obligated the assessee to deduct TDS u/s 195read

HERSHEY INDIA P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO ( INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & TRANSFER PRICING) , BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 96/IND/2018[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 Dec 2022
For Appellant: Shri Anil Khabya, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. D.R
Section 133Section 201(1)

Permanent Establishment)” certificate from Reda, Italy and accordingly the, the assessee was of the view that it was not required to deduct tax at source on such payments made for purchase of machinery. 4. In the proceedings under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act, the AO held that Reda, Italy had business connection/PE in India on the following

HERSHEY INDIA P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO ( INTERNATIONAL TAXATION & TRANSFER PRICING) , BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 97/IND/2018[16-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 Dec 2022
For Appellant: Shri Anil Khabya, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. D.R
Section 133Section 201(1)

Permanent Establishment)” certificate from Reda, Italy and accordingly the, the assessee was of the view that it was not required to deduct tax at source on such payments made for purchase of machinery. 4. In the proceedings under section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act, the AO held that Reda, Italy had business connection/PE in India on the following

THE DY. CIT 4(1), INDORE vs. M/S. VIJAYSHRI PACKAGING LTD. , INDORE

ITA 721/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Feb 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Vijayshri Packaging Dcit-4(1), Vs. Limited, 34-C/2, Industrial Estate Laxmi Indore Bai Nagar, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aabcv0048B C.O.No.11/Ind/2020 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Vijayshri Packaging Vs. Dcit-4(1), Limited, 34-C/2, Industrial Estate Indore Laxmi Bai Nagar, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No. Aabcv0048B Revenue By Shri Lal Chand, Cit Appellant By S/Shri Ajay Tulsiyan & Ranjan Agrawal, Cas Date Of Hearing 12.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 09.02.2021 O R D E R

Section 131Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56(1)(viib)Section 68

TDS of Rs.27,000/- has been deducted and reflected in the computation of income. Establishing identity, genuineness and creditworthiness is not applicable as transaction is repayment of loan given and not loan taken. Para 5.4 – Page 16 Thus, Proviso to Section 68 is The Ld. AO has very categorically clear: the creditworthiness and stated that the transactions needs genuineness

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

ITA 232/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 115BSection 143(3)

permanent fund which has to be kept intact and only income generated out of corpus has to be utilised. It is found that the assessee has not- fulfilled such conditions and as such, the claimed exemption uls l1(l)(d) of the Act is not allowable otherwise also. 4.42 In view of all the above facts and circumstances

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

ITA 776/IND/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 115BSection 143(3)

permanent fund which has to be kept intact and only income generated out of corpus has to be utilised. It is found that the assessee has not- fulfilled such conditions and as such, the claimed exemption uls l1(l)(d) of the Act is not allowable otherwise also. 4.42 In view of all the above facts and circumstances

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 2(1), INDORE vs. M/S. IDEAL ASHIYANA PRIVATE LIMITED, INDORE

ITA 528/IND/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore15 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2013-14 Acit-2(1) M/S Ideal Ashiyana Indore Private Ltd., Indore बनाम/ Vs. (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee) Pan: Aadci 0029 F Assessee By Shri Pankaj Shah, Ar Revenue By Shri P.K. Mitra, Cit-Dr Date Of Final Hearing 27.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 15.12.2022

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)

permanent account number of persons from whom such advances are claimed to be received which is lying as liability. Thus, assessee has failed to prove the identity of persons and genuineness of these liabilities and has failed to explain the sources of these credit entries in its books. Assessee also had failed to give any documents showing the purpose