BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai192Bangalore114Delhi90Chennai50Kolkata48Ahmedabad21Cuttack14Jaipur14Cochin12Indore9Raipur6Hyderabad6Rajkot4Pune4Chandigarh4Surat3Agra2Allahabad2Jodhpur2Lucknow2Karnataka1Jabalpur1Ranchi1SC1Guwahati1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 408Disallowance6Addition to Income6Section 115J4Section 36(1)(va)4Section 684Deduction4Section 143(3)3Section 194H3Section 253(2)

LAMPEX ELECTRONICS LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 589/HYD/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Oct 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P.N.Moorthy, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 115JSection 253(2)Section 36(1)(va)Section 68

68 of the Act. 9. On this aspect, Learned AR submitted that the authorities did not seek any explanation from the assessee after submitting the books even Page 4 of 10 ITA Nos.589/Hyd/2020, 96/Hyd/2021 C.O.No.6/Hyd/2021 the Learned CIT(A) also did not give an opportunity to the assessee to explain the discrepancies in the invoices, which according to them

2
Section 194J2
Unexplained Cash Credit2

ACIT, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. LAMPEX ELECTRONICS LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 96/HYD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Oct 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P.N.Moorthy, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 115JSection 253(2)Section 36(1)(va)Section 68

68 of the Act. 9. On this aspect, Learned AR submitted that the authorities did not seek any explanation from the assessee after submitting the books even Page 4 of 10 ITA Nos.589/Hyd/2020, 96/Hyd/2021 C.O.No.6/Hyd/2021 the Learned CIT(A) also did not give an opportunity to the assessee to explain the discrepancies in the invoices, which according to them

MANNE HAREESH,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 661/HYD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Oct 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2013-14 Manne Hareesh, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 103, Sita Mansion, 1-10- Ward-6(2), 104/14, Mayur Marg, Hyderabad. Begumpet, Hyderabad. Pan: Admpm 6479 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri T. Ramamurthy, Ca Revenue By: Sri Nilanjan Dey, Dr Date Of Hearing: 23/09/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 30/10/2019 Order Per A. Mohan Alankamony, Am.:

For Appellant: Sri T. Ramamurthy, CAFor Respondent: Sri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 143(3)Section 192Section 194HSection 194JSection 40

194J and 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual engaged in wholesale trade of oil and lubricants filed its return of income for the AY 2013-14 on 30.9.2019 admitting taxable income of Rs. 17,02,490/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and finally assessment

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. M/S. COUNTRY CLUB (I) LTD,, HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1654/HYD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmancountry Club Hospitality & Vs Addl. Cit, Range-1 Holidays Ltd Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaacc 9376 B (Appellant) (Respondent) Asstt. Commissioner Of Country Club Hospitality & Income Tax, Circle 1(2) Vs Holidays Ltd Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaacc 9376 B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. K. Srinivas Reddy, DR
Section 200Section 201(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 43B

68,414/- towards Travel Agent Commission. 21. The Ld AO ought to have appreciated that the provisions of section 194C are not applicable to payments made of Rs. 3,57,069/- towards Programme Expenses Payable. 22. The Ld AO ought to have appreciated that the provisions of section 194J

M/S COUNTRY CLUB (INDIA) LTD,HYDERABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1, HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1504/HYD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmancountry Club Hospitality & Vs Addl. Cit, Range-1 Holidays Ltd Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaacc 9376 B (Appellant) (Respondent) Asstt. Commissioner Of Country Club Hospitality & Income Tax, Circle 1(2) Vs Holidays Ltd Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaacc 9376 B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. K. Srinivas Reddy, DR
Section 200Section 201(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 43B

68,414/- towards Travel Agent Commission. 21. The Ld AO ought to have appreciated that the provisions of section 194C are not applicable to payments made of Rs. 3,57,069/- towards Programme Expenses Payable. 22. The Ld AO ought to have appreciated that the provisions of section 194J

CHELIKAMMUNICATIONS,TIRUPATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), TIRUPATI., TIRUPATI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 487/HYD/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, C.AFor Respondent: Shri D.J.P. Anand, SR-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 40

section 194J of the Act. However, the assessee deposited an amount of Rs.68,377/- only into the credit of the central government, out of TDS of Rs.22,37,265/-. Therefore, the Ld. AO treated the balance amount on which TDS has been made but not remitted to ITA No.487/Hyd/2023 3 the credit of the central government to the extent