BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “section 68”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai113Delhi85Chennai29Kolkata27Bangalore26Ahmedabad10Hyderabad10Rajkot9Indore6Pune6Jaipur5Surat3Cuttack2Lucknow1Jodhpur1Nagpur1Raipur1Chandigarh1Ranchi1Karnataka1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 194H21Section 4019Disallowance9Addition to Income9Section 143(3)8TDS7Section 143(2)6Section 143(1)5Depreciation5Deduction

DCIT., CIRCLE 3(1), HYDERABAD vs. RATHNAMMA INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1235/HYD/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Nov 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 142(1)Section 194H

194H of the Act, confirmations in respect of unsecured loans and the details of loans etc. The A.O., on the basis of information submitted by the assessee observed that, the assessee had taken unsecured loans from various parties, including, Shri 3 Rathnamma Infratech Private Limited K.V. Satish Kumar, Smt. K. Swapna, S.S.K. Prime Spaces Ltd., and K.S.V. Oil Seeds

MANNE HAREESH,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 661/HYD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad
3
Section 142(1)2
Section 40A(3)2
30 Oct 2019
AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2013-14 Manne Hareesh, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 103, Sita Mansion, 1-10- Ward-6(2), 104/14, Mayur Marg, Hyderabad. Begumpet, Hyderabad. Pan: Admpm 6479 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri T. Ramamurthy, Ca Revenue By: Sri Nilanjan Dey, Dr Date Of Hearing: 23/09/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 30/10/2019 Order Per A. Mohan Alankamony, Am.:

For Appellant: Sri T. Ramamurthy, CAFor Respondent: Sri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 143(3)Section 192Section 194HSection 194JSection 40

194H and 40(a)(ia) of the Act. (ii) The Ld. CIT (A) has erred in upholding the order of the Ld. AO who had disallowed accounting charges incurred for Rs. 2,40,000/- invoking the provisions of section 194J and 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee

M/S HIL LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN AS HYDERABAD INDUSTRIES LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-2, , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 1701/HYD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

HIL LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 555/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

M/S HIL LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN AS HYDERABAD INDUSTRIES LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-2, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 1702/HYD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

M/S HIL LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN AS HYDERABAD INDUSTRIES LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-2, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 1703/HYD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

HIL LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 647/HYD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

SRI TIRUMALA ESTATES,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1086/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

Section 194H has been deducted and remitted the same to the Government account. The learned counsel for the assessee, referring to the statement of commission paid to various persons, submitted that the same was available in the paper book from pages 62 to 68

SURAM SRINIVAS,SECUNDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-15(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1923/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jan 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Deviassessment Year: 2012-13 Suram Srinivas, Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Secunderabad. Ward – 15(3), Hyderabad. Pan – Avyps 8511 K Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri B. Shanthi Kumar Revenue By: Shri Sunku Srinivas Date Of Hearing: 01/01/2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 17/01/2020 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri B. Shanthi KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sunku Srinivas
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 194HSection 40Section 68

68 of the Act. He also disallowed the expenditure which is in excess of the expenditure over 0.30% of the turnover and also disallowed an amount of Rs. 1,35,650/- f u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act or not making the TDS u/s 194H of the Act. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on the above terms

ITA 156/HYD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Respondent: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakhsmi, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 40a

section is very clear and the appellant has incurred the expenditure and the appellant has made the payment to the various parties and persons. The appellant has, to circumvent, not accounted for the same and has also not brought out any evidence from M/s.DLF that they have accounted for such transactions in their books as cash payments