BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

17 results for “section 68”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai107Delhi85Chennai29Bangalore26Kolkata24Hyderabad17Ahmedabad10Pune7Indore6Jaipur6Rajkot6Surat3Chandigarh3Cuttack2Karnataka1Nagpur1Jodhpur1Raipur1Ranchi1Lucknow1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 194H26Section 4023Disallowance16TDS11Addition to Income11Section 143(3)8Section 143(2)7Section 143(1)6Deduction5Depreciation

DCIT., CIRCLE 3(1), HYDERABAD vs. RATHNAMMA INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1235/HYD/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 Nov 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON'BLE (Accountant Member)

Section 142(1)Section 194H

194H of the Act, confirmations in respect of unsecured loans and the details of loans etc. The A.O., on the basis of information submitted by the assessee observed that, the assessee had taken unsecured loans from various parties, including, Shri 3 Rathnamma Infratech Private Limited K.V. Satish Kumar, Smt. K. Swapna, S.S.K. Prime Spaces Ltd., and K.S.V. Oil Seeds

MANNE HAREESH,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 661/HYD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad
5
Section 40A(3)4
Section 142(1)2
30 Oct 2019
AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyassessment Year: 2013-14 Manne Hareesh, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 103, Sita Mansion, 1-10- Ward-6(2), 104/14, Mayur Marg, Hyderabad. Begumpet, Hyderabad. Pan: Admpm 6479 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sri T. Ramamurthy, Ca Revenue By: Sri Nilanjan Dey, Dr Date Of Hearing: 23/09/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 30/10/2019 Order Per A. Mohan Alankamony, Am.:

For Appellant: Sri T. Ramamurthy, CAFor Respondent: Sri Nilanjan Dey, DR
Section 143(3)Section 192Section 194HSection 194JSection 40

194H and 40(a)(ia) of the Act. (ii) The Ld. CIT (A) has erred in upholding the order of the Ld. AO who had disallowed accounting charges incurred for Rs. 2,40,000/- invoking the provisions of section 194J and 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. M/S. COUNTRY CLUB (I) LTD,, HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1654/HYD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmancountry Club Hospitality & Vs Addl. Cit, Range-1 Holidays Ltd Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaacc 9376 B (Appellant) (Respondent) Asstt. Commissioner Of Country Club Hospitality & Income Tax, Circle 1(2) Vs Holidays Ltd Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaacc 9376 B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. K. Srinivas Reddy, DR
Section 200Section 201(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 43B

section 194H are not applicable to payments made of Rs.5,68,414/- towards Travel Agent Commission. 21. The Ld AO ought

M/S COUNTRY CLUB (INDIA) LTD,HYDERABAD vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE-1, HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1504/HYD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S.Rifaur Rahmancountry Club Hospitality & Vs Addl. Cit, Range-1 Holidays Ltd Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaacc 9376 B (Appellant) (Respondent) Asstt. Commissioner Of Country Club Hospitality & Income Tax, Circle 1(2) Vs Holidays Ltd Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Aaacc 9376 B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Dr. K. Srinivas Reddy, DR
Section 200Section 201(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 43B

section 194H are not applicable to payments made of Rs.5,68,414/- towards Travel Agent Commission. 21. The Ld AO ought

M/S HIL LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN AS HYDERABAD INDUSTRIES LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-2, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 1702/HYD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

M/S HIL LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN AS HYDERABAD INDUSTRIES LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-2, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 1703/HYD/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

HIL LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 647/HYD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

HIL LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 555/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

M/S HIL LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN AS HYDERABAD INDUSTRIES LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-2, , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 1701/HYD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Nov 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri A.V.Raghu Ram, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40

section 194H and the consequent disallowance does not attract. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes. :- 8 -: M/s. HIL Limited (Formerly known as M/s.Hyderabad Industries Limited) (Group Cases) 10. Ground No.4 is related to opening stock generated during trial run production. During the assessment proceedings, the AO found that

BALA REDDY GOPU, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 455/HYD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Manmohan & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri V. Sreekar
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 145Section 14ASection 17(1)(iv)Section 192Section 194HSection 44A

194H treating it as business income. Hence, the assessee has also treated the same amount as a business income. 9. The AO ought to have appreciated that the assessee has got his books of accounts audited ul s 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 10. The Ld. CIT (A) erred in disallowing the expenditure of Rs.1

SRI TIRUMALA ESTATES,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1086/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

Section 194H has been deducted and remitted the same to the Government account. The learned counsel for the assessee, referring to the statement of commission paid to various persons, submitted that the same was available in the paper book from pages 62 to 68

SURAM SRINIVAS,SECUNDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-15(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1923/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jan 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Deviassessment Year: 2012-13 Suram Srinivas, Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Secunderabad. Ward – 15(3), Hyderabad. Pan – Avyps 8511 K Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri B. Shanthi Kumar Revenue By: Shri Sunku Srinivas Date Of Hearing: 01/01/2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 17/01/2020 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri B. Shanthi KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sunku Srinivas
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 194HSection 40Section 68

68 of the Act. He also disallowed the expenditure which is in excess of the expenditure over 0.30% of the turnover and also disallowed an amount of Rs. 1,35,650/- f u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act or not making the TDS u/s 194H of the Act. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on the above terms

ITA 156/HYD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Respondent: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakhsmi, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 40a

section is very clear and the appellant has incurred the expenditure and the appellant has made the payment to the various parties and persons. The appellant has, to circumvent, not accounted for the same and has also not brought out any evidence from M/s.DLF that they have accounted for such transactions in their books as cash payments

SUNIL VISHRAM CHAWDA, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. CIT (OSD), RANGE-10, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals under consideration are allowed

ITA 1432/HYD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri K.A. SaiprasadFor Respondent: Shri B. Suresh Babu
Section 194H

68,054/- by making disallowance of Rs. 52,57,750/- on account of commission, disallowing 20% of expenses debited in profit and loss account under various heads. 2.1 During the assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee had debited a sum of Rs.52,57,750/- in the P&L account as commission expenses. The assessee was asked

SUNIL VISHRAM CHAWDA, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-14(1), HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals under consideration are allowed

ITA 1433/HYD/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 May 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri K.A. SaiprasadFor Respondent: Shri B. Suresh Babu
Section 194H

68,054/- by making disallowance of Rs. 52,57,750/- on account of commission, disallowing 20% of expenses debited in profit and loss account under various heads. 2.1 During the assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee had debited a sum of Rs.52,57,750/- in the P&L account as commission expenses. The assessee was asked

SUNIL VISHRAM CHAWDA, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-10(1), HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals under consideration are allowed

ITA 1431/HYD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri K.A. SaiprasadFor Respondent: Shri B. Suresh Babu
Section 194H

68,054/- by making disallowance of Rs. 52,57,750/- on account of commission, disallowing 20% of expenses debited in profit and loss account under various heads. 2.1 During the assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee had debited a sum of Rs.52,57,750/- in the P&L account as commission expenses. The assessee was asked

SUNIL VISHRAM CHAWDA, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-10(1), HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals under consideration are allowed

ITA 1430/HYD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri K.A. SaiprasadFor Respondent: Shri B. Suresh Babu
Section 194H

68,054/- by making disallowance of Rs. 52,57,750/- on account of commission, disallowing 20% of expenses debited in profit and loss account under various heads. 2.1 During the assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee had debited a sum of Rs.52,57,750/- in the P&L account as commission expenses. The assessee was asked