DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C.V. Bhadang, Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri G. Manjunatha

business of development of infrastructure projects, filed its original return of income for the assessment year 2009-10 on 21-09-2009, admitting a total income of Rs.113,58,17,240/-. The assessment has been completed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 27.12.2011 accepting the returned income. A search and seizure operation under section

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

business income eligible for deduction u/s 80IA of the Act. He further contended that when the assessee was found indulged in the activity of inflating the expenditure and siphoning of the fund through the sub- contractor/sister concern, then the benefit of section 80IA of the Act cannot be allowed to the assessee in respect of disallowances made by the Assessing

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

business income eligible for deduction u/s 80IA of the Act. He further contended that when the assessee was found indulged in the activity of inflating the expenditure and siphoning of the fund through the sub- contractor/sister concern, then the benefit of section 80IA of the Act cannot be allowed to the assessee in respect of disallowances made by the Assessing

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

business income eligible for deduction u/s 80IA of the Act. He further contended that when the assessee was found indulged in the activity of inflating the expenditure and siphoning of the fund through the sub- contractor/sister concern, then the benefit of section 80IA of the Act cannot be allowed to the assessee in respect of disallowances made by the Assessing

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

business income eligible for deduction u/s 80IA of the Act. He further contended that when the assessee was found indulged in the activity of inflating the expenditure and siphoning of the fund through the sub- contractor/sister concern, then the benefit of section 80IA of the Act cannot be allowed to the assessee in respect of disallowances made by the Assessing

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

business income eligible for deduction u/s 80IA of the Act. He further contended that when the assessee was found indulged in the activity of inflating the expenditure and siphoning of the fund through the sub- contractor/sister concern, then the benefit of section 80IA of the Act cannot be allowed to the assessee in respect of disallowances made by the Assessing

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

business income eligible for deduction u/s 80IA of the Act. He further contended that when the assessee was found indulged in the activity of inflating the expenditure and siphoning of the fund through the sub- contractor/sister concern, then the benefit of section 80IA of the Act cannot be allowed to the assessee in respect of disallowances made by the Assessing

PITTI HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.450/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2018-19) M/S. Pitti Holdings Pvt. Asst. Commissioner Of Vs. Ltd., Hyderabad. Income Tax, Central Circle Pan: Aagcp3824Q 1(1), Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri A. Srinivas, C.A. राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 09/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 08/10/2025

income for the assessment year 2018-19 on 27-09-2018 and returned current year loss at Rs.1.55,676/-. The case was selected for complete scrutiny under CASS and assessment uls 143(3) was passed on 22-01-2021 by the AD, National e- Assessment Centre, Delhi. The issue for CASS selection was i) Business Loss ii) Share Capital/Other Capital

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. ASIAN INFRA ESTATES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon'Ble Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G. Accountant Hon'Bleआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.683/Hyd/2022 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20) Asstt. Commissioner Of Vs. Asian Dwellings Llp Income Tax, Hyderabad Central Circle 2(3) Pan:Abmfa1423A Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.684 & 685/Hyd/2022 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Asstt. Commissioner Of Vs. Asian Infra Estates Ltd Income Tax, Hyderabad Pan:Aabca7660 & Central Circle 2(3) Hyderabad Asian Infra Estates Llp Hyderabad Pan:Abnf5143L (Appellant) (Respondent) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri B. Balakrishna, Dr िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, Ca सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 26/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 25/10/2024 आदेश/Order Per Manjunatha, G. A.M These 3 Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate, But Identical Orders Passed By The Learned

reassess total income for entire six years block Page 19 of 21 ITA Nos 683 684 and 685 Asian Dwellings LLP and Asian Infra Estates Ltd assessment period even in case of completed/unabated assessment – Held, yes – Whether I case of search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A, Assessing Officer assumes jurisdiction for block assessment u/s 2153A and that all pending

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. ASIAN DWELLINGS LLP, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon'Ble Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G. Accountant Hon'Bleआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.683/Hyd/2022 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20) Asstt. Commissioner Of Vs. Asian Dwellings Llp Income Tax, Hyderabad Central Circle 2(3) Pan:Abmfa1423A Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.684 & 685/Hyd/2022 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Asstt. Commissioner Of Vs. Asian Infra Estates Ltd Income Tax, Hyderabad Pan:Aabca7660 & Central Circle 2(3) Hyderabad Asian Infra Estates Llp Hyderabad Pan:Abnf5143L (Appellant) (Respondent) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri B. Balakrishna, Dr िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, Ca सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 26/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 25/10/2024 आदेश/Order Per Manjunatha, G. A.M These 3 Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate, But Identical Orders Passed By The Learned

reassess total income for entire six years block Page 19 of 21 ITA Nos 683 684 and 685 Asian Dwellings LLP and Asian Infra Estates Ltd assessment period even in case of completed/unabated assessment – Held, yes – Whether I case of search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A, Assessing Officer assumes jurisdiction for block assessment u/s 2153A and that all pending

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. ASIAN INFRA ESTATES LLP, SECUNDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon'Ble Vice- & Shri Manjunatha, G. Accountant Hon'Bleआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.683/Hyd/2022 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20) Asstt. Commissioner Of Vs. Asian Dwellings Llp Income Tax, Hyderabad Central Circle 2(3) Pan:Abmfa1423A Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.684 & 685/Hyd/2022 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Asstt. Commissioner Of Vs. Asian Infra Estates Ltd Income Tax, Hyderabad Pan:Aabca7660 & Central Circle 2(3) Hyderabad Asian Infra Estates Llp Hyderabad Pan:Abnf5143L (Appellant) (Respondent) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri B. Balakrishna, Dr िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, Ca सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 26/09/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 25/10/2024 आदेश/Order Per Manjunatha, G. A.M These 3 Appeals Filed By The Revenue Are Directed Against The Separate, But Identical Orders Passed By The Learned

reassess total income for entire six years block Page 19 of 21 ITA Nos 683 684 and 685 Asian Dwellings LLP and Asian Infra Estates Ltd assessment period even in case of completed/unabated assessment – Held, yes – Whether I case of search u/s 132 or requisition u/s 132A, Assessing Officer assumes jurisdiction for block assessment u/s 2153A and that all pending

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. AMSRI BUILDERS, SECUNDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue for A

business profits under Section\n28(i) of the Act. Thus, we are inclined to uphold the findings of\nLD.CIT(A) and dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue.\n19. In the result, the appeal of Revenue for A.Y. 2010-11 is\ndismissed.\nITA No.1898 of 2018 for A.Y. 2011-12\n20. The grounds raised by the Revenue in ITA\nNo.1898/Hyd/2024

SHIVA RANJANI VEJJA ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-12(2) , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

business income. Subsequently, based on the source of income for AY 2017- 18 which was shown as salary, filed on 21/08/2017, the jurisdiction wag again reverted back to ITO Wd 12(2), Hyderabad. As per the order u/s 120 of the I.T. Act, the source of income is used to determine the jurisdiction. It is pot material what

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

business of Infrastructure Projects.\nIn the original return of income filed on 28.11.2013 for the\nimpugned assessment year 2013-2014, the assessee\ndeclared income at Rs.104,87,01,480/-, but has not\nclaimed any deduction u/sec.80IA(4) of the Act. In this case,\na search and seizure operation u/sec.132 of the Act was\nconducted and in response to notice u/sec.153A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result appeals filed by the Revenue\nITA

business of Infrastructure Projects.\nIn the original return of income filed on 28.11.2013 for the\nimpugned assessment year 2013-2014, the assessee\ndeclared income at Rs.104,87,01,480/-, but has not\nclaimed any deduction u/sec.80IA(4) of the Act. In this case,\na search and seizure operation u/sec.132 of the Act was\nconducted and in response to notice u/sec.153A

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), HYDERBAD vs. SEW INFRASTUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

business of Infrastructure Projects.\nIn the original return of income filed on 28.11.2013 for the\nimpugned assessment year 2013-2014, the assessee\ndeclared income at Rs.104,87,01,480/-, but has not\nclaimed any deduction u/sec.80IA(4) of the Act. In this case,\n\na search and seizure operation u/sec.132 of the Act was\nconducted and in response to notice

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

business of Infrastructure Projects.\nIn the original return of income filed on 28.11.2013 for the\nimpugned assessment year 2013-2014, the assessee\ndeclared income at Rs.104,87,01,480/-, but has not\nclaimed any deduction u/sec.80IA(4) of the Act. In this case,\n3\nITA. Nos.1721, 1722 & 1723/Hyd./2017\nAnd ITA.No.1416/Hyd./2019\na search and seizure operation u/sec.132

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. AMSRI BUILDERS , SECUNDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue for A

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. Hon’Ble & Shri K. Narasimha Chary Hon’Ble

business profits under Section 28(i) of the Act. Thus, we are inclined to uphold the findings of LD.CIT(A) and dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue. 19. In the result, the appeal of Revenue for A.Y. 2010-11 is dismissed. ITA No.1898 of 2018 for A.Y. 2011-12 20. The grounds raised by the Revenue in ITA No.1898/Hyd/2024