SABIR , SEW & PRASAD JV,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

73,858/-, vide cancellation agreement\ndated 01.11.2006, the original agreement was cancelled with the NSC,\nConsortium and one more agreement dated 01.11.2006 was entered into\nwith NSC Consortium, Sri Avanthika contractors & two of its constituents\nSEW and PRASAD for executing the balance project work in the ratio of\n50%, 25%, 12.5% & 12.5% respectively.\n7.26 Similarly, in the case of Gorakallu

SABIR, SEW 7 PRASAD JV,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

73,858/-, vide cancellation agreement\ndated 01.11.2006, the original agreement was cancelled with the NSC,\nConsortium and one more agreement dated 01.11.2006 was entered into\nwith NSC Consortium, Sri Avanthika contractors & two of its constituents\nSEW and PRASAD for executing the balance project work in the ratio of\n50%, 25%, 12.5% & 12.5% respectively.\n\n7.26 Similarly, in the case

SABIR, SEW & PRASAD JV,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

73,858/-, vide cancellation agreement\ndated 01.11.2006, the original agreement was cancelled with the NSC,\nConsortium and one more agreement dated 01.11.2006 was entered into\nwith NSC Consortium, Sri Avanthika contractors & two of its constituents\nSEW and PRASAD for executing the balance project work in the ratio of\n50%, 25%, 12.5% & 12.5% respectively.\n\n7.26 Similarly, in the case

SRIDHAR REDDY BAYAPU,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

Bench: Us:

4. Thereafter, the assessment was framed by the A.O vide his order passed under Section 143(3) of the Act, dated 30/12/2018, wherein the assessee’s claim for exemption raised under Section 54 of the Act on sale of a residential property for Rs.72.54 lacs based on investment made by him in a new residential property was declined. 5. Aggrieved

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD vs. NSL RENEWABLE POWER PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

House Property 1,167,323 Short term Capital Gains 26,671,450 Income from other sources 157,480,998 Gross Total Income (190,392,200) Deduction computed u/s. 80-IA at NIL Rs. 589,89,757 but restricted to NIL on account of negative GTI 4. Ld. DR further in his submissions tried to distinguish the Hon’ble SC decision

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD vs. NSL RENEWABLE POWER PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

House Property 1,167,323 Short term Capital Gains 26,671,450 Income from other sources 157,480,998 Gross Total Income (190,392,200) Deduction computed u/s. 80-IA at NIL Rs. 589,89,757 but restricted to NIL on account of negative GTI 4. Ld. DR further in his submissions tried to distinguish the Hon’ble SC decision

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. TRACKS & TOWERS INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED(PART IX), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the revenue are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

property of Indian Railways and the Government of India by default and any development 'with regard to the Railway Infrastructure cannot be done without the approval of the Indian Railways. Thus by default all the development of infrastructure has to have an explicit approval of the Indian Railways as per the above OM. Coming back to the decision

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. TRACKS & TOWERS INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED(PART IX), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the revenue are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

property of Indian Railways and the Government of India by default and any development 'with regard to the Railway Infrastructure cannot be done without the approval of the Indian Railways. Thus by default all the development of infrastructure has to have an explicit approval of the Indian Railways as per the above OM. Coming back to the decision

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

housing plots at "Haritavanam project". In such process, M/s Bhuvanesh Constructions and Developers collected the total receipts from sale of plots and transferred the same to the assessee company. The sale receipts admitted in the return of income by the assessee company in respect of Haritavanam Project for various years are as under: AY. 2014-15 AY. 2015-16 Total

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2) , HYDERABAD vs. LAXMI KOMATIREDDY , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

property was registered later. (iii) Villa No.6 was already under agreement for sale entered into on 12-11-2014 with M/s.Gummadi Divya Reddy. Out of agreed amount of Rs. 3 crores, Rs.25 lakhs was paid by cheque on 02-05-2014; Rs.15 lakhs was paid on 13-08- 2014; Rs.10 lakhs was paid on 14-10-2014. Therefore, there