SKANDA INFRA PROJECTS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

undisclosed\nturnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses\nnot actually attributable for the purpose of business activity\nwhich required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

undisclosed\nturnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses\nnot actually attributable for the purpose of business activity\nwhich required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

undisclosed\nturnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses\nnot actually attributable for the purpose of business activity\nwhich required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income

B. JANARDHAN REDDY, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue is allowed

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Memebr Assessment Year: 2008-09

undisclosed income assessed. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) who confirmed the order of the A.O and the assessee is in second appeal before us. 3 ITA.No. 1465/Hyd/2017 Janardhan Reddy Bekkery., Hyderabad. 3. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the disallowances

SKANDHANSHI DEVELOPERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

undisclosed turnover of the assessee. Nature of part of expenses not actually attributable for the purpose of business activity which required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) and claim of expenses paid to Commission Agents for marketing sale of flats are appears to be high and not subjected to TDS, which attracts disallowance u/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

undisclosed\nturnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses\nnot actually attributable for the purpose of business activity\nwhich required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

SKANDA INFRA PROJECTS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

undisclosed\nturnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses\nnot actually attributable for the purpose of business activity\nwhich required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

undisclosed turnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses not actually attributable for the purpose of business activity which required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income