SKANDA INFRA PROJECTS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

undisclosed\nturnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses\nnot actually attributable for the purpose of business activity\nwhich required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

undisclosed\nturnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses\nnot actually attributable for the purpose of business activity\nwhich required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE

undisclosed\nturnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses\nnot actually attributable for the purpose of business activity\nwhich required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income

SKANDHANSHI DEVELOPERS,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

undisclosed turnover of the assessee. Nature of part of expenses not actually attributable for the purpose of business activity which required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) and claim of expenses paid to Commission Agents for marketing sale of flats are appears to be high and not subjected to TDS, which attracts disallowance u/sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income

RAJENDER REDDY GUNNA ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, HYDERABAD

undisclosed income from commissi on because, the\nassessee could not explain the said transacti on with\nrelevant details to prove his claim that, said income has\nbeen already offered to tax. The learned CIT(A) after\nconsidering relevant facts, has rightly sustained the\nadditi on made by the Assessing Officer. Thus, we are\ninclined to uphold the order the learned

SKANDHANSHI INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KURNOOL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

undisclosed\nturnover of the assessee. Further, nature of part of expenses\nnot actually attributable for the purpose of business activity\nwhich required to be disallowed u/sec.37(1) of the Income

RAJENDER REDDY GUNNA ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, HYDERABAD

disallowed advertisement expenses on the\nground that, assessee has failed to deduct TDS u/sec.194C\nof the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee claims that\npayment to individual persons does not exceed the sum\nspecified u/sec.194C of the Act for making TDS and,\ntherefore, when the assessee has furnished relevant ledger\nextract copies and proved that, all payments are below

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD vs. VARSHA VISWANATH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee as well as the Revenue are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

disallowed. The undisclosed income of the assessee in respect of “Haritavanam Project” is therefore worked out as under: Page 6 of 46 M/s. Varsha

RAJENDER REDDY GUNNA ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, HYDERABAD

income in the status of HUF and Sri G.\nRajendra Reddy being has Karta of the HUF. The income\nreturned in the earlier assessment year is very meagre going\nby the return of income filed for the assessment years 2003-\n2004 to 2005-2006. From the above, it is seen that, the\nargument of the assessee that, HUF was having