Search: disallowance

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 72Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai84 Kolkata39 Chennai34 Delhi29 Ahmedabad12 Bangalore8 Hyderabad6 Pune6 Karnataka3 Jaipur3 Jodhpur1 Cochin1 Raipur1 Rajkot1 SC1 Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 153A16 Section 143(3)12 Section 139(1)6 Disallowance6 Addition to Income6 Section 143(2)4 Search & Seizure4 Section 1322 Section 92C2

NEOVANTAGE BIO-TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE 5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 924/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Respondent: Dr. Narendra Kumar Naik

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 92C

disallowance of Rs.37,75,420/-. 19. Ground No.8 of the assessee’s appeal relates to non-grant of set- off of unabsorbed depreciation. The assessee contends that the Ld. AO has not granted proper benefit of carry forward and set-off of unabsorbed depreciation in the assessment year under consideration. In this regard, the first contention

NEOVANTAGE BIO-TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE 5(1), HYDERABAD

NEOVANTAGE BIO-TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE 5(1), HYDERABAD

NEOVANTAGE INNOVATION PARK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 16(3), HYDERABAD

ASCEND TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD vs. ASCEND TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED , SECUNDERABAD

JT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD), CENTRAL CIRLCE -1(2) , HYDERABAD vs. AMSRI BUILDERS, SECUNDERABAD

JT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD), CENTRAL CIRLCE -1(2) , HYDERABAD vs. AMSRI BUILDERS, SECUNDERABAD