INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), HYDERABAD vs. BHAGYANAGAR INDIA LIMITED , SECUNDERABAD
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed
ITA 1200/HYD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Aug 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1200/Hyd/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2016-17) Income Tax Officer, M/S. Bhagyanagar India Ward-1(3), Hyderabad. Vs. Limited, Hyderabad. Pan:Aaacb8963C (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Shri K.C. Devdas, C.A. रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By: Shri Narender Kumar Naik, Cit-Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 24/07/2025 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement: 08/08/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M. : This Appeal Is Filed By Revenue, Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Hyderabad (“Ld. Cit(A)”), Dated 16.05.2019 For The A.Y. 2016-17. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:
For Appellant: Shri K.C. Devdas, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Narender Kumar Naik
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 37(1)Section 80
43A of the Act, any loss on account of foreign exchange
fluctuation was liable to be capitalised. He placed reliance on the
decision of the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in the case of DCIT
Vs. Patanjali Foods Ltd. in ITA No.1172/Mum/2023 & others dated
05.04.2024, to contend that such losses cannot be amortised for
purposes of Section 115JB, as they