BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

17 results for “depreciation”+ Section 12A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai180Bangalore149Delhi139Chennai70Ahmedabad37Jaipur37Lucknow30Kolkata29Pune20Chandigarh18Hyderabad17Karnataka15Cuttack14Visakhapatnam13Indore7Agra5Cochin5Nagpur4Patna2Jodhpur2Telangana2Panaji2Dehradun1Raipur1SC1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 1128Section 143(3)16Exemption16Addition to Income16Section 12A15Depreciation9Section 11(5)7Section 1327Section 1477Search & Seizure

DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD vs. DBS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 151/HYD/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Dbs Technology Income Tax, Services India Private Circle – 8(1), Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No.2/Hyd/2023 Assessment Year 2019-20 Dbs Technology Services India Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Circle – 8(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Cross Objector / (Appellant/Revenue) Respondent) Assessee By: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 11.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, Jm: The Appeal & Cross-Objection Filed By The Revenue For A.Y. 2019-20 Arise From The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi

For Appellant: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)

12A, section 44AB [, section 44DA, section 50B], section 80-IA, section 80-IB, section 80-IC, section 80-ID, section 80JJAA, section 80LA, section 92E, [section 115JB, 5[section 115JC] or section 115VW] [or to give a notice under clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 11] of the Act, he shall furnish the same electronically.] [(3) The return

7
Section 143(1)6
Section 10A5

SANGHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -3 (1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 104/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, ARFor Respondent: Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 80ISection 92CSection 92E

depreciation in respect of such machinery or plant has been allowed or is allowable under the provisions of this Act in computing the total income of any person for any period prior to the date of the installation of machinery or plant by the assessee. Explanation 2.—Where in the case of an undertaking, any machinery or plant

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 304/HYD/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

b) of the Act, ii) the assessee will have to maintain separate set of books in accordance with section 11(4A) of the Act, iii) the assessee has to keep its funds under the mode specified u/s.11(5) of the Act and iv) there should not be any violation of section 13 of the Act C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 306/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

b) of the Act, ii) the assessee will have to maintain separate set of books in accordance with section 11(4A) of the Act, iii) the assessee has to keep its funds under the mode specified u/s.11(5) of the Act and iv) there should not be any violation of section 13 of the Act C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 300/HYD/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

b) of the Act, ii) the assessee will have to maintain separate set of books in accordance with section 11(4A) of the Act, iii) the assessee has to keep its funds under the mode specified u/s.11(5) of the Act and iv) there should not be any violation of section 13 of the Act C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 302/HYD/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

b) of the Act, ii) the assessee will have to maintain separate set of books in accordance with section 11(4A) of the Act, iii) the assessee has to keep its funds under the mode specified u/s.11(5) of the Act and iv) there should not be any violation of section 13 of the Act C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 303/HYD/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

b) of the Act, ii) the assessee will have to maintain separate set of books in accordance with section 11(4A) of the Act, iii) the assessee has to keep its funds under the mode specified u/s.11(5) of the Act and iv) there should not be any violation of section 13 of the Act C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 305/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

b) of the Act, ii) the assessee will have to maintain separate set of books in accordance with section 11(4A) of the Act, iii) the assessee has to keep its funds under the mode specified u/s.11(5) of the Act and iv) there should not be any violation of section 13 of the Act C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 301/HYD/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

b) of the Act, ii) the assessee will have to maintain separate set of books in accordance with section 11(4A) of the Act, iii) the assessee has to keep its funds under the mode specified u/s.11(5) of the Act and iv) there should not be any violation of section 13 of the Act C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022

SHILPARAMAM ARTS, CRAFTS AND CULTURAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, EXEMPTION CIRCLE 1(1) , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 547/HYD/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Feb 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Y.V. Bhanu Narayan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri N. Raja Kumar, DR
Section 12ASection 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

B”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं/ITA No. 547/Hyd/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Shilparamam Arts, Crafts Vs. Income Tax Officer, & Cultural Society, Exemption Circle-1(1), Hyderabad Hyderabad [PAN No. AAAAS9711R] अपीलधर्थी/Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी/Respondent निर्धाररती‍द्वधरध/Assessee by: Shri Y.V. Bhanu Narayan Rao, AR रधजस्‍व‍द्वधरध/Revenue

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2214/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2215/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2216/HYD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2210/HYD/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2211/HYD/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2213/HYD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2212/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have