BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

22 results for “depreciation”+ Section 12Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai264Delhi208Bangalore169Chennai90Kolkata40Ahmedabad39Jaipur39Lucknow33Pune25Visakhapatnam22Hyderabad22Karnataka22Chandigarh19Cuttack16Amritsar14Cochin11Indore10Agra5Nagpur4Patna3Rajkot3Dehradun2Raipur2Jodhpur2Panaji2Surat2Telangana2SC1

Key Topics

Section 1136Section 12A21Exemption19Section 143(3)18Addition to Income18Depreciation14Section 11(5)11Section 143(1)9Section 1327Section 147

DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD vs. DBS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 151/HYD/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Dbs Technology Income Tax, Services India Private Circle – 8(1), Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No.2/Hyd/2023 Assessment Year 2019-20 Dbs Technology Services India Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Circle – 8(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aafcd5584N (Cross Objector / (Appellant/Revenue) Respondent) Assessee By: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.A. Revenue By: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 11.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, Jm: The Appeal & Cross-Objection Filed By The Revenue For A.Y. 2019-20 Arise From The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi

For Appellant: Sri M. P. Lohia, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)

12A, section 44AB [, section 44DA, section 50B], section 80-IA, section 80-IB, section 80-IC, section 80-ID, section 80JJAA, section 80LA, section 92E, [section 115JB, 5[section 115JC] or section 115VW] [or to give a notice under clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 11] of the Act, he shall furnish the same electronically.] [(3) The return

Showing 1–20 of 22 · Page 1 of 2

7
Search & Seizure7
Disallowance6

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF CONSTRUCTION,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

Appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 445/HYD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri C.S.Subramanyam, ARFor Respondent: Shri T.Sunil Goutam, DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 80G

12A as well as Section 80G for the current year. Such registrations were in force for the A.Y.2015-2016 as well as till the date of filing of this appeal. The appellant is a charitable entity carrying on the activity of skill development training and education mainly in the construction field operating in the state of Telangana. It runs various training

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 305/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

Depreciation claimed at Rs. 2,11,03,552/-, was incurred towards the object of the society, even though the assessee could not produce evidence for the new assets added during the year and failed to prove that the assets were put to use towards the objects of society. C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022 7. The Id. CIT (Appeals) has erred

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 306/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

Depreciation claimed at Rs. 2,11,03,552/-, was incurred towards the object of the society, even though the assessee could not produce evidence for the new assets added during the year and failed to prove that the assets were put to use towards the objects of society. C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022 7. The Id. CIT (Appeals) has erred

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 300/HYD/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

Depreciation claimed at Rs. 2,11,03,552/-, was incurred towards the object of the society, even though the assessee could not produce evidence for the new assets added during the year and failed to prove that the assets were put to use towards the objects of society. C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022 7. The Id. CIT (Appeals) has erred

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 301/HYD/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

Depreciation claimed at Rs. 2,11,03,552/-, was incurred towards the object of the society, even though the assessee could not produce evidence for the new assets added during the year and failed to prove that the assets were put to use towards the objects of society. C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022 7. The Id. CIT (Appeals) has erred

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 303/HYD/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

Depreciation claimed at Rs. 2,11,03,552/-, was incurred towards the object of the society, even though the assessee could not produce evidence for the new assets added during the year and failed to prove that the assets were put to use towards the objects of society. C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022 7. The Id. CIT (Appeals) has erred

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 302/HYD/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

Depreciation claimed at Rs. 2,11,03,552/-, was incurred towards the object of the society, even though the assessee could not produce evidence for the new assets added during the year and failed to prove that the assets were put to use towards the objects of society. C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022 7. The Id. CIT (Appeals) has erred

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA

ITA 304/HYD/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 132

Depreciation claimed at Rs. 2,11,03,552/-, was incurred towards the object of the society, even though the assessee could not produce evidence for the new assets added during the year and failed to prove that the assets were put to use towards the objects of society. C.O. Nos.19 to 24/Hyd/2022 7. The Id. CIT (Appeals) has erred

CHURCH OF CHRIST ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS-4, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1688/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Jul 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonya.Y. 2012-13 Church Of Christ, Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad. (Exemptions)-4, Pan: Aabtc 3506 E Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sri A.V. Raghuram Revenue By Sri D.J. Prabhakar Anand, Dr Date Of Hearing: 16/06/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 26/07/2021 Order

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)

depreciation. 4. During the course of scrutiny assessment proceedings, it was observed by the ld. AO that the assessee had received Rs. 77,96,563/- towards donation for construction of church Rs. 62,90,085/-, repairs and maintenance Rs. 4,52,012/-, borewells Rs. 2,66,666/-, burial grounds Rs. 5,13,680 and two wheelers

THE ICFAI SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 661/HYD/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2015-16 The Icfai Society, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad. (Exemptions), Hyderabad. Pan : Aaajt0214B. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri S. Ramarao, Advocate. (Appeared Through Virtual Mode) Revenue By: Smt. Th Vijaya Lakshmi, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 30.07.2024 30.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement:

For Appellant: Shri S. Ramarao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. TH Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 13(8)Section 143(2)Section 154Section 2(15)

depreciation which was not charged against income. 10. That the order of the CIT (A) is bad in law and facts in arbitrarily rejecting the condonation of delay petition in filing Form 35 for following reason; The appeal has been already decided on merit through a speaking order. (ii) The CIT (A) rejected the condonation of delay petition after

SHILPARAMAM ARTS, CRAFTS AND CULTURAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, EXEMPTION CIRCLE 1(1) , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 547/HYD/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Feb 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Y.V. Bhanu Narayan Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri N. Raja Kumar, DR
Section 12ASection 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) and working under Youth Advancement Tourism and Culture Department (YAT & C), Government of Telangana State. Assessee society was established with the objects of promotion of Art & Culture and providing support to artists and artisans by the United State of Andhra Pradesh. The receipts of the society are related

SANGHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -3 (1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 104/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, ARFor Respondent: Ms. K. Haritha, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 80ISection 92CSection 92E

depreciation in respect of such machinery or plant has been allowed or is allowable under the provisions of this Act in computing the total income of any person for any period prior to the date of the installation of machinery or plant by the assessee. Explanation 2.—Where in the case of an undertaking, any machinery or plant

KRANTI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for both the A

ITA 645/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos 645 & 646/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Kranti Educational Society Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad Ward-1 Pan:Aaaak6913B Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P.Vinod, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri V P Pavan Kumar, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 18/07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 18/07/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri P.Vinod, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri V P Pavan Kumar, DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 249

12A Page 1 of 5 ITA Nos 645 and 646 of 2024 Kranti Educational Society or approval u/s 10(23C) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The assessee filed its return of income for both the A.Ys u/s 139(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 and return of income filed by the assessee has been processed

KRANTI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for both the A

ITA 646/HYD/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Jul 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos 645 & 646/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Kranti Educational Society Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad Ward-1 Pan:Aaaak6913B Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P.Vinod, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri V P Pavan Kumar, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 18/07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 18/07/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri P.Vinod, AdvocateFor Respondent: : Shri V P Pavan Kumar, DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 249

12A Page 1 of 5 ITA Nos 645 and 646 of 2024 Kranti Educational Society or approval u/s 10(23C) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The assessee filed its return of income for both the A.Ys u/s 139(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 and return of income filed by the assessee has been processed

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2215/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2216/HYD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2214/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2213/HYD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD vs. VIGNANA JYOTHI, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2212/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Apr 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147

12A by Hon'ble ITAT, I am of the considered opinion that there is no case for denial of exemption u/s 11. As the Assessing Officer reported that the donations are voluntary and towards corpus funds, I hold that the addition of Rs.2,29,99,999/- (AY. 2005-06) and Rs.1,84,85,000/- (A Y 2006-07), have