MARUTHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central submitted that, the seized material reveal fee packages exceeding government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee

CMR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central submitted that, the seized material reveal fee packages exceeding government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee

CMR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central submitted that, the seized material reveal fee packages exceeding government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee

MARRI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central submitted that, the seized material reveal fee packages exceeding government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee

MALLA REDDY EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central submitted that, the seized material reveal fee packages exceeding government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee

MALLA REDDY EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central submitted that, the seized material reveal fee packages exceeding government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee

M.G.R.EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

69,000/- not for\nthe purpose of the objects of the trust. The Ld. PCIT (Central)\nlinked the above cash expenditure to the unaccounted fee\ncollections in the form of donations or capitation fee from students\nfor getting admissions to the institutions and observed that the\nactivities carried out by the appellant society are not genuine and\nare not being

CHANDRAMMA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central submitted that, the seized material reveal fee packages exceeding government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee

CHANDRAMMA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central submitted that, the seized material reveal fee packages exceeding government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee

CMR TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee's claim of compliance to Government norms lacks merit

CMR TECHNICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust Vs. DCIT (Central) (2025) 173 Taxmann.com 577, Bangalore Tribunal. 15. Ms. U. Mini Chandran, learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, supporting the Order of the learned PCIT-Central government limits, with lump-sum tuition fees lacking clear bifurcation from ancillary charges. Further, the assessee's claim of compliance to Government norms lacks merit

MARRI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA\nNo

69,000/- not for\nthe purpose of the objects of the trust. The Ld. PCIT (Central)\nlinked the above cash expenditure to the unaccounted fee\ncollections in the form of donations or capitation fee from students\nfor getting admissions to the institutions and observed that the\nactivities carried out by the appellant society are not genuine and\nare not being

M.G.R.EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee for A

69,000/- and observed that the cash expenditure had\nbeen incurred not for the purpose/objects of the trust.\nThe Ld. PCIT (Central) further observed that the above cash\nexpenses and the unaccounted cash found and seized from the\nresidential premises of the trustees and related persons' evidence\nthe fact that the appellant society has been generating\nunaccounted cash receipts from

MARUTHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA\nNo

69,000/- not for\nthe purpose of the objects of the trust. The Ld. PCIT (Central)\nlinked the above cash expenditure to the unaccounted fee\ncollections in the form of donations or capitation fee from students\nfor getting admissions to the institutions and observed that the\nactivities carried out by the appellant society are not genuine and\nare not being

ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Charitable Trust 12-10-2017 6,00,000 8 Sri Ramakrishna Seva Samithi 06-03-2018 10,00,000 Sub Total 2,48,50,000 9 Sahrudaya Health, Medical & Educational Trust 30-04-2017 7,00,000 31-05-2017 8,00,000 Sub Total

RAVI RISHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 (4), HYDERABAD

In the result, the solitary ground raised by the Revenue in the appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyassessment Year: 2017-18 Ravi Rishi Educational A.C.I.T. Society, Hyderabad Central Circle 2(4) Pan:Aaaar1952M Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao Revenue By: Shri Esthen N Hangal, Dr Date Of Hearing: 07/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 19/07/2022 Order Per R.K. Panda, A.M This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 21/04/2022 Of The Learned Cit (A)-12, Hyderabad Relating To A.Y.2017-18. 2. Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is An Aop & Registered U/S 12A Of The I.T. Act Vide Proceedings Of The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) Hyderabad In F.No.Hqrs/I/15/12A/Dit(E) Dated 27.02.2003. The Assessee Filed Its Original Return Of Income For The A.Y 2017-18 On 06.11.2017 Admitting Total Income Of Rs.Nil. M/S. Ravi Rishi Educational Society Is Run By Close Family Members Mr.N.Rajababu, Mr.Ramesh Babu, Mrs. N. Sulochana, Mrs. N. Yashoda, Mrs. N.

charitable purposes as mandated by section 11 of the I.T. Act and therefore, denied exemption granted to it u/s 11 of the I.T. Act. Similarly, the Assessing Officer made another addition of Rs.11,00,06,345/- u/s 69 of the I.T. Act being unexplained investment in Nandigama Page 10 of 18 ITA No 146 of 2022 Ravi Rishi Educational Society

SHREE GOVATTS FOUNDATION ,HYDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year – N.A.

section 12AA registration for the sole reason that its objects are both charitable as well as religious in nature. That being the case, from judicial pronouncements i.e., Sri Sri Sri Dattatreya Seva Samsthanam Vs. Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad (2016) 69 taxmann.com 360 (Hyderabad Trib), DIT(E), Vs. Seervi Sanaj Tambaram Trust

BHARGAVI SAJJA,TELANGANA vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

section 12AB of the Act. We have gone through Clause 3 of the trust deed placed at Page No. 3 of the paper book and found that the trust’s charitable objectives include providing educational and medical aid to the underprivileged. We have also perused the documentary evidences filed by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(E), including (i) submission