BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

62 results for “depreciation”+ Section 11(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,738Delhi4,362Bangalore1,722Chennai1,607Ahmedabad1,089Kolkata1,008Pune659Hyderabad545Jaipur498Chandigarh340Karnataka260Cochin224Raipur210Visakhapatnam208Surat201Indore198Cuttack176Amritsar148Rajkot90Lucknow90SC80Jodhpur68Nagpur68Ranchi67Guwahati62Telangana58Agra33Panaji26Patna22Dehradun22Allahabad21Kerala20Calcutta17Varanasi9Orissa7Jabalpur7Punjab & Haryana6Rajasthan6Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)49Addition to Income44Disallowance37Section 153C29Section 80I28Section 8028Section 25024Deduction20Section 801E19Depreciation

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 8/GTY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

Showing 1–20 of 62 · Page 1 of 4

18
Section 6815
Section 143(1)11
ITA 98/GTY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 89/GTY/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 90/GTY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 278/GTY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 7/GTY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 03, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 27/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 03, GUWAHATI vs. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 28/GTY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD.,GUWAHATI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 5/GTY/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI vs. M/S. NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD., GUWAHATI

In the result, appeals of the assessee in I

ITA 97/GTY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Assessee`S Appeals

For Appellant: Shri Jayanta Dutta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Sarma, DR
Section 80

2 ) for the Assessment Year 2009-10 ; Rs. 13,97,827/- (10). Disallowance of claims of deduction of 'Prior period Depreciation'. Ground and Assessment Year Amount Ground.No.(5)for the Assessment Year 2009-10, Rs.2,58,27,259/- AndRs.22,83,310/- Numaligarh Refinery Limited (11). Disallowance of claim of deduction for “Provision for Allowance for Non- Management Staff'” Ground

SHRI SUBHASH CHANDRA DEY,DHARMANAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- SILCHAR, SILCHAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 120/GTY/2011[1/4/1989 to 8/12/1999]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 120/Gty/2011 Block Year: 01/04/1989 To 08/12/1999 Shri Subhash Chandra Dey Assistant Commissioner Of Office-Tilla Vs Income Tax, Circle-Silchar Dharmanagar -799250 Tripura [Pan: Acrpd1916F] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Nirmal Singh Dugar, ITPFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 132Section 158B

2) In computing the undisclosed income of the block period, the provisions of Sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B and 69C shall, so far as may be, apply and references to 'financial year' in those sections shall be construed as references to the relevant previous year falling in the block period including the previous year ending with the date of search

SMT. MAYA RANI DEY,DHARMANAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SILCHAR, SILCHAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 121/GTY/2011[1/4/1989 to 8/12/1999]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 120/Gty/2011 Block Year: 01/04/1989 To 08/12/1999 Shri Subhash Chandra Dey Assistant Commissioner Of Office-Tilla Vs Income Tax, Circle-Silchar Dharmanagar -799250 Tripura [Pan: Acrpd1916F] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Nirmal Singh Dugar, ITPFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 132Section 158B

2) In computing the undisclosed income of the block period, the provisions of Sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B and 69C shall, so far as may be, apply and references to 'financial year' in those sections shall be construed as references to the relevant previous year falling in the block period including the previous year ending with the date of search

SHRI ASHISH KUMAR DEY,DHARMANAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SILCHAR, SILCHAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 122/GTY/2011[1/4/1989 to 8/12/1999]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati20 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 120/Gty/2011 Block Year: 01/04/1989 To 08/12/1999 Shri Subhash Chandra Dey Assistant Commissioner Of Office-Tilla Vs Income Tax, Circle-Silchar Dharmanagar -799250 Tripura [Pan: Acrpd1916F] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Nirmal Singh Dugar, ITPFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 132Section 158B

2) In computing the undisclosed income of the block period, the provisions of Sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B and 69C shall, so far as may be, apply and references to 'financial year' in those sections shall be construed as references to the relevant previous year falling in the block period including the previous year ending with the date of search

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 114/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

11. The additions were confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide para 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 which are extracted as under: “6.2. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 1 & 2: The Appellant contended that AO was not justified in treating GMC tax paid as revenue expenditure instead of capital expenditure. However, it is observed that the said amount

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

11. The additions were confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide para 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 which are extracted as under: “6.2. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 1 & 2: The Appellant contended that AO was not justified in treating GMC tax paid as revenue expenditure instead of capital expenditure. However, it is observed that the said amount

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 117/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

11. The additions were confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide para 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 which are extracted as under: “6.2. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 1 & 2: The Appellant contended that AO was not justified in treating GMC tax paid as revenue expenditure instead of capital expenditure. However, it is observed that the said amount

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 115/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

11. The additions were confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide para 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 which are extracted as under: “6.2. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 1 & 2: The Appellant contended that AO was not justified in treating GMC tax paid as revenue expenditure instead of capital expenditure. However, it is observed that the said amount

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 112/GTY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

11. The additions were confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide para 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 which are extracted as under: “6.2. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 1 & 2: The Appellant contended that AO was not justified in treating GMC tax paid as revenue expenditure instead of capital expenditure. However, it is observed that the said amount

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 110/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

11. The additions were confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide para 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 which are extracted as under: “6.2. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 1 & 2: The Appellant contended that AO was not justified in treating GMC tax paid as revenue expenditure instead of capital expenditure. However, it is observed that the said amount

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

11. The additions were confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) vide para 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 which are extracted as under: “6.2. Decision on Ground(s) of Appeal No(s). 1 & 2: The Appellant contended that AO was not justified in treating GMC tax paid as revenue expenditure instead of capital expenditure. However, it is observed that the said amount