BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai645Delhi409Karnataka348Bangalore240Chennai163Kolkata77Jaipur70Calcutta52Telangana51Hyderabad40Ahmedabad36Lucknow22Pune20Chandigarh19Nagpur18Rajkot15SC15Indore13Visakhapatnam12Surat8Cochin8Dehradun8Jodhpur7Patna6Raipur5Amritsar5Agra5Varanasi5Cuttack3Guwahati2Andhra Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Himachal Pradesh1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Orissa1Panaji1Allahabad1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 26314Section 143(3)2Revision u/s 2632

M/S. NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD.,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 418/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 263

gains of any previous year are required to be computed in accordance with relevant accounting standards. Similarly, the case of G.R. Karthkeyan (supra) also w#l not benefft the revenue as it did not decide any controversy of accrual or mercanfie system of accounting. The judgment deals with winning from gambling and batting income, there is no issue about accounts

M/S. NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD.,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 45/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Guwahati
12 Dec 2022
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 263

gains of any previous year are required to be computed in accordance with relevant accounting standards. Similarly, the case of G.R. Karthkeyan (supra) also w#l not benefft the revenue as it did not decide any controversy of accrual or mercanfie system of accounting. The judgment deals with winning from gambling and batting income, there is no issue about accounts