MAYURPLY INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.,HOOGHLY, WEST BENGAL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 3, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result IT(SS)A Nos

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

17-18, 18-19 2. (a) For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have deleted the addition made by the A.O. on account of unsecured loans treating it as unexplained credit of Rs. 4,03,00,000/wrongly invoking the provisions of section 68. (b) For that

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2,99,14,790/- 3,26,82,790/- 27,68,000/- 2017-18 1,16,25,711/- 1,29,13,711/- 12,88,000/- 2018-19 1,01,25,690/- 1,39,61,346/- 11,60,000/- 26,75,650/- 2019-20 3,20,17

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2,99,14,790/- 3,26,82,790/- 27,68,000/- 2017-18 1,16,25,711/- 1,29,13,711/- 12,88,000/- 2018-19 1,01,25,690/- 1,39,61,346/- 11,60,000/- 26,75,650/- 2019-20 3,20,17

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2,99,14,790/- 3,26,82,790/- 27,68,000/- 2017-18 1,16,25,711/- 1,29,13,711/- 12,88,000/- 2018-19 1,01,25,690/- 1,39,61,346/- 11,60,000/- 26,75,650/- 2019-20 3,20,17

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2,99,14,790/- 3,26,82,790/- 27,68,000/- 2017-18 1,16,25,711/- 1,29,13,711/- 12,88,000/- 2018-19 1,01,25,690/- 1,39,61,346/- 11,60,000/- 26,75,650/- 2019-20 3,20,17

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2,99,14,790/- 3,26,82,790/- 27,68,000/- 2017-18 1,16,25,711/- 1,29,13,711/- 12,88,000/- 2018-19 1,01,25,690/- 1,39,61,346/- 11,60,000/- 26,75,650/- 2019-20 3,20,17

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2,99,14,790/- 3,26,82,790/- 27,68,000/- 2017-18 1,16,25,711/- 1,29,13,711/- 12,88,000/- 2018-19 1,01,25,690/- 1,39,61,346/- 11,60,000/- 26,75,650/- 2019-20 3,20,17

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2,99,14,790/- 3,26,82,790/- 27,68,000/- 2017-18 1,16,25,711/- 1,29,13,711/- 12,88,000/- 2018-19 1,01,25,690/- 1,39,61,346/- 11,60,000/- 26,75,650/- 2019-20 3,20,17

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2,99,14,790/- 3,26,82,790/- 27,68,000/- 2017-18 1,16,25,711/- 1,29,13,711/- 12,88,000/- 2018-19 1,01,25,690/- 1,39,61,346/- 11,60,000/- 26,75,650/- 2019-20 3,20,17

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

2,99,14,790/- 3,26,82,790/- 27,68,000/- 2017-18 1,16,25,711/- 1,29,13,711/- 12,88,000/- 2018-19 1,01,25,690/- 1,39,61,346/- 11,60,000/- 26,75,650/- 2019-20 3,20,17

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. M/S. DHAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of revenue is partly allowed

TDS on commission paid to partners. The ld. AO has alleged that the assessee failed to deduct tax at source on the commission paid to its partners. The ld. CIT(A) dealt with the case placing reliance on the decision of ITAT Chandigarh in the case of Assam Tea House, Chandigarh Vs. Department of Income Tax in ITA No.759/Chd/2011 observed

M/S. NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD.,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

17. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT (2000) 243 ITR 83 (SC) has laid down following ratio with regard to provisions of section 263 of the Act: “There can be no doubt that the provision cannot be invoked to correct each and every type of mistake or error committed by the Assessing

M/S. NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD.,SHILLONG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

17. Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT (2000) 243 ITR 83 (SC) has laid down following ratio with regard to provisions of section 263 of the Act: “There can be no doubt that the provision cannot be invoked to correct each and every type of mistake or error committed by the Assessing

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

17. Thus after the search under section 132 of the Income Tax Act on any assessee. Section 153A comes into play leading to:- (a) Academic issuance of a notice under section 153A for six assessment years prior to the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search was conducted; and (b) if the ld. Assessing Officer comes

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

17. Thus after the search under section 132 of the Income Tax Act on any assessee. Section 153A comes into play leading to:- (a) Academic issuance of a notice under section 153A for six assessment years prior to the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search was conducted; and (b) if the ld. Assessing Officer comes

SAUQUL ISLAM,NORTH LAKHIMPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-NORTH LAKHIMPUR, NORTH LAKHIMPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.235/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15)

17,88,797 minus Rs. 2,21,539) was added to the total income of the assessee as suppressed income from business. 4 Sayqul Islam Assessment Year:2014-15 7. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(A) who has reduced the estimated profit on turnover from

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. ACHULA DARNEICHONG SAILO, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sri Manomohan Das & Sri Rakesh Mishra

TDS deducted of Rs. 17,000/- and had also deposited cash to the tune of Rs. 2,28,95,200/- & Rs. 14,50,000/- totalling to Rs. 2,43,45,200/- during the year under consideration. The assessee also had high value banking transactions amounting to Rs. 47,29,500/- as per the details at page 2 of the assessment

TRIPURA STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LTD.,AGARTALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA , AGARTALA

Bench: Sh. S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

17 & 16/2013-14, involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”). Its appeals ITA Nos. 242 & 243/GAU/2017 are directed against the very CIT(A)’s separate orders; both dated 26.10.2017 passed in case nos. CIT(A)/SHG/10322 & 10328/2016-17 involving proceedings u/s 154 of the Act. 2. The assessee’s last three appeals

TRIPURA STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LIMITED ,AGARTALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Bench: Sh. S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

17 & 16/2013-14, involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”). Its appeals ITA Nos. 242 & 243/GAU/2017 are directed against the very CIT(A)’s separate orders; both dated 26.10.2017 passed in case nos. CIT(A)/SHG/10322 & 10328/2016-17 involving proceedings u/s 154 of the Act. 2. The assessee’s last three appeals

TRIPURA STATE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LIMITED ,AGARTALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - AGARTALA, AGARTALA

Bench: Sh. S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

17 & 16/2013-14, involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”). Its appeals ITA Nos. 242 & 243/GAU/2017 are directed against the very CIT(A)’s separate orders; both dated 26.10.2017 passed in case nos. CIT(A)/SHG/10322 & 10328/2016-17 involving proceedings u/s 154 of the Act. 2. The assessee’s last three appeals