PANKAJ BANSAL,GURGAON vs. PR,CIT (CENTRAL), GURGAON

In the result, ITA.No.383/Del

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P.Kant

u/s 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. 37 ITA.Nos.383, 384, 385 & 386/Del./2021 Smt. Abha Bansal, Sh Pankaj Bansal, Sh Basant Bansal And Sh Roop Kumar Bansal, Gurgaon. (xviii) That section 263 of the Act cannot be invoked to make deeper enquiry. In other words, allegation of proper enquiry or inadequate enquiry cannot

ROOP KUMAR BANSAL,GURGAON vs. PR,CIT (CENTRAL), GURGAON

In the result, ITA.No.383/Del

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P.Kant

u/s 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. 37 ITA.Nos.383, 384, 385 & 386/Del./2021 Smt. Abha Bansal, Sh Pankaj Bansal, Sh Basant Bansal And Sh Roop Kumar Bansal, Gurgaon. (xviii) That section 263 of the Act cannot be invoked to make deeper enquiry. In other words, allegation of proper enquiry or inadequate enquiry cannot

ABHA BANSAL,GURGAON vs. PCIT, CENTRAL, GURGAON

In the result, ITA.No.383/Del

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P.Kant

u/s 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. 37 ITA.Nos.383, 384, 385 & 386/Del./2021 Smt. Abha Bansal, Sh Pankaj Bansal, Sh Basant Bansal And Sh Roop Kumar Bansal, Gurgaon. (xviii) That section 263 of the Act cannot be invoked to make deeper enquiry. In other words, allegation of proper enquiry or inadequate enquiry cannot

SHRI BASANT BANSAL,GURGAON vs. PR,CIT (CENTRAL), GURGAON

In the result, ITA.No.383/Del

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P.Kant

u/s 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. 37 ITA.Nos.383, 384, 385 & 386/Del./2021 Smt. Abha Bansal, Sh Pankaj Bansal, Sh Basant Bansal And Sh Roop Kumar Bansal, Gurgaon. (xviii) That section 263 of the Act cannot be invoked to make deeper enquiry. In other words, allegation of proper enquiry or inadequate enquiry cannot

CHARBUJA MARMO (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. PR.CIT- 2 , NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of Assessee allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri B.R.R. Kumar

revised under section 263 of the I.T. Act. A.O. made enquiry of all the documents but Ld. Pr. CIT did not make any enquiry on the documentary evidences on record. Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the issue is same as have been considered and decided in the cases of M/s. Supersonic Technologies Pvt. Ltd., M/s. SPJ 72 ITA.No

ITO WARD - 14(2), NEW DELHI vs. KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT LTD, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S STYLISH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUR BUILDCON PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

LANDSKY REAL ESTATES P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-15(1), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

ITO WARD - 13(3), NEW DELHI vs. JINGLE BELLS ALUMINIUM PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUNLIGHT TOUR AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD., SAHIBABAD

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S ANGEL CEMENT PVT. LTD.,, GHAZIABAD

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

KASPER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-14(2), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUKHNA STEEL PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SUPREME PLACEMENT SERVICES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SINTEX CONSUMERS ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD., DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Revised Grounds of Technology Pvt. Appeal filed on 19.10.2020 Ltd. Ground 1: The Ld. C.I.T.(A)-05, New Delhi [ITA NO. 357/DEL/ while correctly deleting the addition 2019] of Rs. 46,00,00,000/- made by the Ld. A.O. u/s 68, erred in making fresh addition of Rs. 92,00,000/- to the income of the Appellant Company on account