BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 56(2)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai37Hyderabad28Bangalore22Chennai21Delhi7Jodhpur6Kolkata3Jaipur2Patna1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 14812Section 1478Section 567Addition to Income6Section 285Section 1434Section 684Reassessment4Reopening of Assessment

RAJ SHEELA GROWTH FUND (P) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 21(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 881/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Aug 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L. P. Sahu

For Appellant: S/Shri Raj Kumar Gupta and SumitFor Respondent: Shri J.K. Mishra, CIT-D.R
Section 127Section 143(3)Section 224Section 56Section 56(2)(viia)Section 68

Reassessment order can be by a different officer)." 19. We would reiterate that sub-section (1) to Section 124 states that the Assessing Officer would have jurisdiction over the area in terms of any direction or order issued under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) to Section 120 of the Act. Jurisdiction would depend upon the place where

4
Disallowance4
Section 143(1)3
Section 133A3

CAIRN UK HOLDING LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result ground No. 5 of the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1669/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Mar 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Puri CIT
Section 143(3)Section 144

2)/2Q13-14/453 dated ' 25.02.2014" (Emphasis added) 6.8 Further, in the said reasons, at various places reference was given of the February 2014. This goes to prove that the survey report was received by the AO in the month of February 2014 only. 6.9 In view of the above, the Appellant submits that since the survey report had been received

YOUNG INDIAN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT(E), NEW DELHI

ITA 1251/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Shri Amit Shukla(Through Video Conference)

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Soparkar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.C. Srivastava, Special Counsel
Section 12ASection 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 28Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(viia)

56(2)(viia) that governs the taxation of receipts of shares of a company, the AO could not have invoked Section 28(iv) of the Act in respect of such transaction. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO GROUNDS NO. I TO VI GROUND NO. VII: REFERENCE TO THE DEPARTMENTAL VALUATION OFFICER ("DVO") BEYOND THE SCOPE OF SECTION 142A

INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL LIMITED vs. DCIT CIRCLE 12 (2)

ITA/116/2023HC Delhi26 Sept 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

147 read with Section 144 W.P.(C) 13991/2022 21 June 2021 23 May 2022 25 July 2022 Notice under Section 148 Order under Section 148A(b) Order under Section 148A(d) and Notice under Section 148 W.P.(C) 14034/2022 27 May 2022 28 July 2022 Order under Section 148A(b) Order under Section 148A(d) and Notice under Section

LAMBA BRICKS PVT. LTD.,BHIWANI vs. ACIT, BHIWANI

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 708/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini

For Appellant: Shri N.K. Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms.Bedobani, Sr. DR
Section 133ASection 139Section 143Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 68

147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Return declaring an income of Rs. 1,99,990/- filed on 14.09.2009 and same was processed u/s 143(1). The assessee derieves income from running of BKO. Lamba Bricks Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT Subsequently survey operation u/s 133A of the income-tax Act, 1961 was carryout on 21.3.2012 at the business premises

LAMBA BRICKS PVT. LTD.,BHIWANI vs. ACIT, BHIWANI

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 706/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini

For Appellant: Shri N.K. Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms.Bedobani, Sr. DR
Section 133ASection 139Section 143Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 68

147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Return declaring an income of Rs. 1,99,990/- filed on 14.09.2009 and same was processed u/s 143(1). The assessee derieves income from running of BKO. Lamba Bricks Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT Subsequently survey operation u/s 133A of the income-tax Act, 1961 was carryout on 21.3.2012 at the business premises

LAMBA BRICKS PVT. LTD.,BHIWANI vs. ACIT, BHIWANI

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 707/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini

For Appellant: Shri N.K. Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms.Bedobani, Sr. DR
Section 133ASection 139Section 143Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 68

147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Return declaring an income of Rs. 1,99,990/- filed on 14.09.2009 and same was processed u/s 143(1). The assessee derieves income from running of BKO. Lamba Bricks Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT Subsequently survey operation u/s 133A of the income-tax Act, 1961 was carryout on 21.3.2012 at the business premises