HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), GURGAON

In the result, all three appeals of the assessee are allowed, and the\nstay application is dismissed as being infructuous

147 taxmann.com\n224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for\nfinal adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court\njudgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave\nneither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once\nleave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality.\n6\nITA Nos.827/D/21 With

CLAAS AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 4(2), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

8) TMI 460-Bombay\nHigh Court) to the Assessee therein.\n5\nITA No. 4563/Del/2024\nClass Agricultural Machinery Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT\n6. The Ld. Senior Counsel further submitted that, in the present\nproceedings, the Assessee neither relying on the Judgment of Hon'ble\nHigh Court of Judicature at Bombay in the case of Shelf Drilling Ron\nTappmeyer Ltd. (supra

MUFG BANK LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2(2)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, all five appeals of the assessee are allowed

8, Aerocity, NH-8, New Delhi.\nPAN No.AABCT3880D\nबनाम\nVs.\nACIT, Circle 2(2)(1),\nInternational Taxation,\nE-2 Block, Civic Centre,\nMinto Road, New Delhi.\n\nअपीलार्थी Appellant\nAssessee by\nRevenue by\nShri Kshitij Bansal, CA\nShri Dharm Veer Singh, CIT DR\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\n\nसुनवाईकीतारीख / Date of hearing: 27.01.2026\nउद्घोषणाकीतारीख /Pronouncement on 27.01.2026\n\nआदेश /ORDER\n\nPERSANJAY

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL & CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-25(1), DELHI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwalteva Pharmaceutical & Chemical Vs Assessment Unit, Income Industries India Private Limited, Tax Department/Deputy 8Th Floor, C-Wing Time Square, Commissioner Of Income Andherikurla Road, Marol Naka, Tax, Circle 25(1), Opp Mittal Industrial Estate C. R. Building, Delhi- Andheri (E), Mumbai 400059, 110001 Maharashtra, India Pan: Bnspk7225H Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Sachit Jolly, Sr. Adv, Sh. Sohamdua, Adv& Sh. Abhiudaya Shankar Bajpai, Adv Revenue By Sh. S. K. Jadhav, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 19/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 19/01/2026 Order Per Yogesh Kumar, U.S. Jm: The Captioned Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Challenging The Final Assessment Order Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) R.W.

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC) (Annexure-C). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave does not affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality

LINTEC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,SOUTH DELHI, DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 13(1), OFFICE OF DCIT, CR BUILDING, DELHI,

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwallintec India Private Limited Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of 14Th Floor, Eros Corporate Tower, Income Tax, Circle 13(1), Nehru Place, South Delhi, Delhi Office Of The Dcit, C. R. 110019, Building, Delhi Pan: Aaccl23772F Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Supriya Mehta, Ca Revenue By Sh. S. K. Jadhav, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 19/01/2026 Date Of Pronouncement 21/01/2026

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC) (Annexure-C). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave does not affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality

BOEING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (DCIT) , CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, all ITA Nos

8(1), Range Code 40,\nC.R. Building,\nNew Delhi.\nअपीलार्थी Appellant\nप्रत्यर्थी/Respondent\nAssessee by\nShri Salil Kapoor, Advocate, Ms. Ananya Kapoor,\nAdvocate, Shri Utkarsa Kumar Gupta, Advocate &\nShri Shivam Yadav, Advocate\nRevenue by\nShri Dharm Veer Singh, CIT DR\nआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.5340/Del/2024\nनिर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2021-22\nINTERGLOBE AIR TRANSPORT LIMITED,\n3rd Floor, Dr. Gopal Das Bhawan

BENETTON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , CIRCLE 4(2), NEW DELHI, CR BUILDING

In the result, all ITA Nos

147 taxmann.com 224\n(SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final\nadjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment\nstands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm\nthe High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the\nHigh Court judgment loses finality

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION- 2, NEW DELHI vs. HYUNDAI ROTEM COMPANY

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

u/s 144C (13) of the Act. Signed By:PRADEEP SHARMA Signing Date:29.10.2025 18:22:45 Signature Not Verified ITA No.304/2025 Page 9 of 46 20. He submitted that the note would show that the date of receipt of DRP directions by the AO is the only issue involved in this appeal and it is purely a question of fact

CUBE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION ASSETS ADVISORS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(1) DELHI, C.R. BUILDING, DELHI, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result,all appeals as per ITA Nos

147 taxmann.com 224\n(SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final\nadjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment\nstands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm\nthe High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the\nHigh Court judgment loses finality

AMPLIFON (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 7, DELHI

In the result, all ITA Nos

147 taxmann.com 224\n(SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final\nadjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment\nstands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm\nthe High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the\nHigh Court judgment loses finality

HONDA INDIA POWER PRODUCTS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-10(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all two appeals are allowed

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.2139 & 2140/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 बनाम Honda India Power Products Ltd. Acit, 409, Dlf Tower B, Vs. Circle-10(1), C.R. Building, Jasola Commercial Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaach8464L अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully

HONDA INDIA POWER PRODUCTS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-10(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all two appeals are allowed

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.2139 & 2140/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 बनाम Honda India Power Products Ltd. Acit, 409, Dlf Tower B, Vs. Circle-10(1), C.R. Building, Jasola Commercial Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaach8464L अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully

FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-9(3), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Prakash Chand Yadav & Shri Manish Agarwalfresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd. Income Tax Officer, B-310, Som Dutt Chamber, Ward-9(3), Bhikaji Cama Place, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi-110066. Pan-Aabcd7720L (Appellant) (Respondent)

u/s 144C of the Act, the relevant provisions are as under: Fresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd. vs. ITO 144B.Faceless Assessment. (1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other provision of this Act, the assessment, reassessment or recomputation under sub-section (3) of section 143 or under section 144 or under section 147, as the case may be, with respect

JAS FORWARDING WORLDWIDE PVT. LTD.,GURUGRAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-13(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, ITA No.1040/Del/2021 (Honda Cars India Ltd

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6120/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Haskoningdhv Consulting Private Limited Acit, Office No.204, 2Nd Floor, Rs Tower, Plot No. B Vs. Circle-10(1), 358A, New Ashok Nagar No.1267, Room No.389 A, 3Rd Floor, C.R. Building, Vasundhara Enclave, East Delhi. Pan No.Aaacm8966G Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully

DCIT, CIRCLE-13(1), NEW DELHI vs. JAS FORWARDING WORLDWIDE PVT. LTD., GURUGRAM

In the result, ITA No.1040/Del/2021 (Honda Cars India Ltd

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6120/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Haskoningdhv Consulting Private Limited Acit, Office No.204, 2Nd Floor, Rs Tower, Plot No. B Vs. Circle-10(1), 358A, New Ashok Nagar No.1267, Room No.389 A, 3Rd Floor, C.R. Building, Vasundhara Enclave, East Delhi. Pan No.Aaacm8966G Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully

ALSTOM BHARAT FORGE POWER PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, ITA No.1040/Del/2021 (Honda Cars India Ltd

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6120/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Haskoningdhv Consulting Private Limited Acit, Office No.204, 2Nd Floor, Rs Tower, Plot No. B Vs. Circle-10(1), 358A, New Ashok Nagar No.1267, Room No.389 A, 3Rd Floor, C.R. Building, Vasundhara Enclave, East Delhi. Pan No.Aaacm8966G Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully

HASKONINGDHV CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-10(1) , DELHI

In the result, ITA No.1040/Del/2021 (Honda Cars India Ltd

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6120/Del/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 बनाम Haskoningdhv Consulting Private Limited Acit, Office No.204, 2Nd Floor, Rs Tower, Plot No. B Vs. Circle-10(1), 358A, New Ashok Nagar No.1267, Room No.389 A, 3Rd Floor, C.R. Building, Vasundhara Enclave, East Delhi. Pan No.Aaacm8966G Delhi. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully

VEETEE FINE FOODS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee pertaining to assessment

Bench: Shrivikas Awasthy & Shrisanjay Awasthiआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.853/Del/2016 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 बनाम Veetee Fine Foods Ltd. Dcit, 551, 5Th Floor, Tower-B, Vs. Circle-26(1), Aggarwal Cyber Plaza, Netaji Subhash Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacp0658C अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.959/Del/2016 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 बनाम Dcit, Veetee Fine Foods Ltd. 551, 5Th Floor, Tower-B, Circle-26(1), Vs. New Delhi. Aggarwal Cyber Plaza, Netaji Subhash Place, New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacp0658C अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2572/Del/2017 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 बनाम Veetee Fine Foods Ltd. Addl. Cit 551, 5Th Floor, Tower-B, Vs. Special Range-9, Aggarwal Cyber Plaza, Netaji Subhash Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacp0658C अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.7371/Del/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 बनाम Veetee Fine Foods Ltd. Addl. Cit 551, 5Th Floor, Tower-B, Vs. Special Range-9, Aggarwal Cyber Plaza, Netaji Subhash Place, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan No.Aaacp0658C अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

147 taxmann.com 224 (SC). The grant of leave signifies that the issue is admitted for final adjudication, and the correctness of the Madras High Court judgment stands squarely under scrutiny. The order granting leave neither affirm the High Court's view, nor does it declare law. Once leave is granted, the High Court judgment loses finality. 11. It is respectfully