BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80G(5)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai41Bangalore17Chennai12Delhi11Kolkata8Lucknow7Indore6Jaipur6Rajkot4Pune4Ahmedabad4Hyderabad3Cuttack2Chandigarh1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 92C31Transfer Pricing10Comparables/TP10TP Method9

COMPAREX INDIA P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2151/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ajit Jain, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(10)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(8)Section 92CSection 92C(3)

80G amounting to INR 15,14,475/- already claimed by the Appellant in its Return of Income. Interest and Penalty Grounds: 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO has erred in levying interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Act in the final assessment order passed for relevant

GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 5358/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2006-07
Section 92C

reassessment.\nIn our view intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act are also\nequivalent to the order of assessment for certain provisions for\nexample, powers u/s 263 of the Act can be initiated against the\nintimation passed by the assessing officer, as it stood at relevant\ntimes. Recently, coordinate bench of the Delhi ITAT in the case of\nJindal

GUJRAT GUARDIAN LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 4856/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2004-05
Section 92C

reassessment.\nIn our view intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act are also\nequivalent to the order of assessment for certain provisions for\nexample, powers u/s 263 of the Act can be initiated against the\nintimation passed by the assessing officer, as it stood at relevant\ntimes. Recently, coordinate bench of the Delhi ITAT in the case of\nJindal

M/S GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT,, NEW DELHI

ITA 2539/DEL/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2005-06
Section 92C

reassessment. In our view intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act are also equivalent to the order of assessment for certain provisions for example, powers u/s 263 of the Act can be initiated against the intimation passed by the assessing officer, as it stood at relevant times. Recently, coordinate bench of the Delhi ITAT in the case of Jindal

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 4791/DEL/2010[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2004-05
Section 92C

reassessment.\nIn our view intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act are also\nequivalent to the order of assessment for certain provisions for\nexample, powers u/s 263 of the Act can be initiated against the\nintimation passed by the assessing officer, as it stood at relevant\ntimes. Recently, coordinate bench of the Delhi ITAT in the case of\nJindal

GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 158/DEL/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2002-03
Section 92C

reassessment.\nIn our view intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act are also\nequivalent to the order of assessment for certain provisions for\nexample, powers u/s 263 of the Act can be initiated against the\nintimation passed by the assessing officer, as it stood at relevant\ntimes. Recently, coordinate bench of the Delhi ITAT in the case of\nJindal

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S GUJRAT GUARDIAN LTD.,, NEW DELHI

ITA 4859/DEL/2009[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2002-03
Section 92C

reassessment.\nIn our view intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act are also\nequivalent to the order of assessment for certain provisions for\nexample, powers u/s 263 of the Act can be initiated against the\nintimation passed by the assessing officer, as it stood at relevant\ntimes. Recently, coordinate bench of the Delhi ITAT in the case of\nJindal

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. GUJRAT GUARDIAN LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 157/DEL/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2003-04
Section 92C

reassessment.\nIn our view intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act are also\nequivalent to the order of assessment for certain provisions for\nexample, powers u/s 263 of the Act can be initiated against the\nintimation passed by the assessing officer, as it stood at relevant\ntimes. Recently, coordinate bench of the Delhi ITAT in the case of\nJindal

GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 159/DEL/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jul 2025AY 2003-04
Section 92C

reassessment. In our view intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act are also equivalent to the order of assessment for certain provisions for example, powers u/s 263 of the Act can be initiated against the intimation passed by the assessing officer, as it stood at relevant times. Recently, coordinate bench of the Delhi ITAT in the case of Jindal

SHREE CHANDI MAA MAHAKALI PRACHIN MANDIR SIDH PEETH SAMITI,SONIPAT vs. CPC, BANGLORE

ITA 4791/DEL/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jan 2025AY 2022-23
Section 92C

iii) The sales made in respect of each category was then consolidated\n\n(iv) Country wise monthly average prices realized in the same or\npreceding month from uncontrolled customers was adopted as\nthe arm's length price for exports made in each country.\n(v) In the absence of sales to unrelated parties in a specific country,\nmonthly average

VISHWADHARMAYATAN TRUST vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ITA/1093/2011HC Delhi27 Aug 2015
Section 12ASection 132Section 158BSection 260ASection 80G

80G of the Act on 11th February 1983. 3. On 1st November 1996 the Income Tax Department („Department‟) undertook a search at the premises of the Assessee at C-18-19, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi under Section 132 of the Act. It is claimed that during the search certain documents were seized and an inventory was prepared. Notices were