Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3,403 results for “reassessment”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,403 Mumbai3,177 Chennai1,134 Ahmedabad810 Kolkata693 Jaipur626 Hyderabad580 Bangalore572 Raipur439 Pune402 Chandigarh372 Indore265 Rajkot253 Surat228 Amritsar200 Cochin182 Patna169 Visakhapatnam160 Nagpur139 Agra135 Cuttack117 Guwahati106 Ranchi96 Dehradun87 Lucknow87 Jodhpur78 Allahabad47 Panaji33 Jabalpur15 Varanasi9

Key Topics

Section 148156 Section 147105 Addition to Income69 Section 153D66 Reassessment43 Section 143(3)33 Section 6829 Section 153A29 Section 148A29 Reopening of Assessment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. PAWAN GUPTA

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/200/2008HC Delhi15 Apr 2009

Section 143Section 143(2)Section 158

reassessment, would have to be followed and the same would include the time limit prescribed for a notice under section 16 (2

RAJAN GUPTA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed as aforesaid

ITA/884/2009HC Delhi05 Jul 2010

For Appellant: Mr M.P. Rastogi with Mr R. Kumar and Mr K.N. AhujaFor Respondent: Ms Prem Lata Bansal

Showing 1–20 of 3,403 · Page 1 of 171

...

28

Limitation/Time-bar22

Section 143(2)Section 158BSection 245CSection 245D(1)Section 260A

sections (1), [(1A), (1B),] [(2), (2A) and (4)] available to the Assessing Officer for making an order of assessment, reassessment

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/1096/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/853/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/139/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/416/2010HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/958/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/936/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/856/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/98/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/263/2010HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/1114/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/1060/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/683/2008HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/57/2008HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/702/2008HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/112/2010HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/932/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/217/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess

M/S EICHER GOODEARTH LTD

The appeals stand disposed of as above

ITA/687/2009HC Delhi18 Nov 2011

For Appellant: Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha, Ms Akanksha Aggarwal andFor Respondent: Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal with Ms P. L. Bansal and Ms Sonia Mathur

2) shall also apply in relation to a case where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred by him in relation to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act. Provided that nothing contained in this section shall empower the Assessing Officer either to reassess