NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, NOIDA

In the result, the assessing officer is directed to allow both the disallowances

Bench: Shripawan Singhand Shribrajesh Kumar Singhआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6540/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 (Physical Hearing) Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Circle-2, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, A-Block, Sector-24, Pan No.Aaaln0639A Noida, Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6541/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit,Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6732/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Acit, बनाम Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, Ca & Shri Bhupesh Agarwal, Ca Revenue By Ms. Monika Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2025 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On 12.12.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Pawan Singh:

deduction under section 80AB of Rs.13.96 Crore was allowed vide order dated 31.03.2016. Copy of intimation under section 143(1), order under section 154 dated 17.02.2012 and order of CIT(A) dated 31.03.2016 is already placed on record. However, subsequently, the ld. PCIT in its letter (direction) dated 21.07.2016, directed the Assessing Officer to initiate reassessment

ACIT, CIRCLE-2, NOIDA vs. NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY, NOIDA

In the result, the assessing officer is directed to allow both the disallowances

Bench: Shripawan Singhand Shribrajesh Kumar Singhआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6540/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 (Physical Hearing) Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Circle-2, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, A-Block, Sector-24, Pan No.Aaaln0639A Noida, Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6541/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit,Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6732/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Acit, बनाम Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, Ca & Shri Bhupesh Agarwal, Ca Revenue By Ms. Monika Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2025 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On 12.12.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Pawan Singh:

deduction under section 80AB of Rs.13.96 Crore was allowed vide order dated 31.03.2016. Copy of intimation under section 143(1), order under section 154 dated 17.02.2012 and order of CIT(A) dated 31.03.2016 is already placed on record. However, subsequently, the ld. PCIT in its letter (direction) dated 21.07.2016, directed the Assessing Officer to initiate reassessment

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. REGENCY CREATIONS LTD

reassessment of assessees claiming deduction under section 10A, it has been decided that the claim of deduction under section 10A of the Income

HALLEX APPLIED POWER PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-11(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2010-11]

reassessment proceedings, as the appellant has not filed the return of income, even though, the information from ITD and ITBA systems shows that the appellant company has earned interest income, contractual payments and fees for professional and technical services from different parties on which TDS was deducted

Video Electronics Ltd vs. Joint CIT

reassessment proceedings were justified and consequent deduction and additions were properly made. However, the Accountant Member agreeing with the contention

ACIT, RANGE-1, GURGAON vs. JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Sh. N. K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year: 2008-09 Acit Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., Range-1 Vs 12, Bhikaji Cama Place, Gurgaon New Delhi Pan No.Aaacj7097D (Appellan (Respondent)

deduction u/s 80 IA of the Act was raised by the Assessing Officer during original proceedings and the same was also duly represented by assessee then reassessment

RAJESH KUMAR,NARNAUL vs. ITO WARD - 2, NARNAUL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1465/Del/2020 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Rajesh Kumar, Vs Income Tax Officer, Krishan Nagar, Narnaul, Ward-2, Mohindergarh, Narnaul, Narnaul, Haryana-123001 Haryana-123001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Axqpk2406F Assessee By : Sh. Lalit Mohan, Ca & Ms. Monika Agarwal, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Indu Bala Saini, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 30.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 03.08.2022

REASSESSMENT PROPOSED NOT ADDED BUT OTHER DEDUCTIONS REDUCED —NOT PERMISSIBLE —INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, ss. 147, 148 10 Rajesh Kumar

ITO, WARD-23(4), NEW DELHI vs. SKYVIEW CONSULTANTS (P) LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarms. Astha Chandra(Through Video Conferencing) Ita No. 6456/Del/2018 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 Income Tax Officer, Vs Skyview Consultants (P) Ltd., Ward-23(4), M-107, Greater Kailash, Part-Ii, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110048 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaics2111H Assessee By : Sh. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Umesh Takyar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 10.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.02.2022

deducted. There was no fresh evidence supporting the reassessment. Consequently, there was no tangible, specific material to justify the impugned

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MORADABAD, MORADABAD vs. GENUS POWER INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed whereas cross appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

deduction under s. 80IC, calculation mistakes etc.] while reassessing the taxable income under the normal provisions of the Act. The book

GENUS POWER INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED,UTTAR PRADESH vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MORADABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed whereas cross appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

deduction under s. 80IC, calculation mistakes etc.] while reassessing the taxable income under the normal provisions of the Act. The book

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION vs. GE PACKAGED POWER INC

reassessment, caused the payer to erroneously refrain from deducting tax under Section 195; it must thus suffer an interest for non- payment

SHIKHAR EXPORTS,NEW DELHI vs. AITO WARD - 54(1), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Sudhir Kumarshikhar Exports Vs. Aito, Ward – 54(1) C/O. Pranshu Goel, C.A. New Delhi 5A/3A, Ansari Road Darya Ganj, New Delhi-110 002 Pan: Aadfs 6406 M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Pranshu Goel, C.A. & Shri Aditya Gupta, Adv. Revenue By: Shri V. K. Dubey, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing 15/10/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18/10/2024

deduction under section 10B of the Act in the reassessment proceeding. 3. We have heard the rival submissions and perused

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. WIMCO GREENS, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

reassessment order, the assessing officer did not allow the deduction of the said expenditure, by any discussion whatsoever, while computing

MAHESH KUMAR,DELHI vs. ITO,WARD-68(6), DELHI

In the result, Ground no. 3 as raised by the assessee deserves to be allowed and the impugned addition cannot be sustained

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C.V. Bhadang(), Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13] Mahesh Kumar, Vs Ito, 6/305/1A, Doonger Ward-68(6), Mohalla, Delhi-110032. Delhi. Pan-Aoopk6335A Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Neeraj Mangla, Ca Respondent By Shri Krishna K. Ramawat, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 06.08.2025

reassessment order but the AO had reduced the claim of deduction u/s 80HH and 80I of the Act. The Hon’ble Delhi

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1), DELHI, DELHI vs. ARTISTIC FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

In the result, Ground no. 3 as raised by the assessee deserves to be allowed and the impugned addition cannot be sustained

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C.V. Bhadang(), Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2012-13] Mahesh Kumar, Vs Ito, 6/305/1A, Doonger Ward-68(6), Mohalla, Delhi-110032. Delhi. Pan-Aoopk6335A Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Neeraj Mangla, Ca Respondent By Shri Krishna K. Ramawat, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 06.08.2025

reassessment order but the AO had reduced the claim of deduction u/s 80HH and 80I of the Act. The Hon’ble Delhi

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. JAY BHARAT MARUTI LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2005-06 & Assessment Year: 2006-07 Acit, Vs. M/S. Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., Circle-4(1), 601, Hemkunt Chamber, New Delhi 89-Nehru Place, New Delhi Pan :Aaacj2021K (Appellant) (Respondent) & C.O. No.113/Del/2012 [Arising Out Of Ita No.908/Del/2012] Assessment Year: 2005-06 & C.O. No.114/Del/2012 [Arising Out Of Ita No.909/Del/2012] Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/S. Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., Vs. Acit, 601, Hemkunt Chamber, Circle-4(1), 89-Nehru Place, New Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaacj2021K (Appellant) (Respondent) & Assessment Year: 2005-06 M/S. Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., Vs. Acit, Neel House, Lado Sarai, Circle-4(1), Opp. Qutab Minar, Mehrauli, New Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaacj2021K (Appellant) (Respondent)

deduction claimed by the assessee towards lease rent. In course of reassessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer issued a show-cause

M/S. JAY BHARAT MARUTI LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2005-06 & Assessment Year: 2006-07 Acit, Vs. M/S. Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., Circle-4(1), 601, Hemkunt Chamber, New Delhi 89-Nehru Place, New Delhi Pan :Aaacj2021K (Appellant) (Respondent) & C.O. No.113/Del/2012 [Arising Out Of Ita No.908/Del/2012] Assessment Year: 2005-06 & C.O. No.114/Del/2012 [Arising Out Of Ita No.909/Del/2012] Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/S. Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., Vs. Acit, 601, Hemkunt Chamber, Circle-4(1), 89-Nehru Place, New Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaacj2021K (Appellant) (Respondent) & Assessment Year: 2005-06 M/S. Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., Vs. Acit, Neel House, Lado Sarai, Circle-4(1), Opp. Qutab Minar, Mehrauli, New Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaacj2021K (Appellant) (Respondent)

deduction claimed by the assessee towards lease rent. In course of reassessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer issued a show-cause

M/S. JAY BHARAT MARUTI LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Deyassessment Year: 2005-06 & Assessment Year: 2006-07 Acit, Vs. M/S. Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., Circle-4(1), 601, Hemkunt Chamber, New Delhi 89-Nehru Place, New Delhi Pan :Aaacj2021K (Appellant) (Respondent) & C.O. No.113/Del/2012 [Arising Out Of Ita No.908/Del/2012] Assessment Year: 2005-06 & C.O. No.114/Del/2012 [Arising Out Of Ita No.909/Del/2012] Assessment Year: 2006-07 M/S. Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., Vs. Acit, 601, Hemkunt Chamber, Circle-4(1), 89-Nehru Place, New Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaacj2021K (Appellant) (Respondent) & Assessment Year: 2005-06 M/S. Jay Bharat Maruti Ltd., Vs. Acit, Neel House, Lado Sarai, Circle-4(1), Opp. Qutab Minar, Mehrauli, New Delhi New Delhi Pan :Aaacj2021K (Appellant) (Respondent)

deduction claimed by the assessee towards lease rent. In course of reassessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer issued a show-cause