BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

171 results for “house property”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai271Delhi171Chennai93Kolkata61Bangalore60Raipur37Pune18Jaipur16Hyderabad14Lucknow12Ahmedabad9Nagpur8Karnataka5Visakhapatnam3Chandigarh3SC3Surat2Dehradun2Telangana1Calcutta1Cuttack1Indore1Jodhpur1Panaji1

Key Topics

Addition to Income90Section 14A88Disallowance75Section 143(3)65Deduction53Section 43B51Section 92C34Depreciation32Section 4028Section 115J

ACIT (LTU), NEW DELHI vs. MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1768/DEL/2011[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Oct 2017AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year : 2002-03

For Appellant: Shri M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Amrendra Kumar, CIT, DR

house property", "Capital gains" or "Income from other sources", or in section 199 or in sections 28 to 43B, the profits

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 961/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2010-11] Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Vs Dcit, Plot No.1, Nelson Mandela Road, Circle-16(1), Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. New Delhi. Pan-Aaacm0829Q Appellant Respondent [Assessment Year : 2010-11] Dcit, Vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Circle-16(1), Plot No.1, Nelson Mandela Road, New Delhi. Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. Pan-Aaacm0829Q Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr.Adv., Shri Neeraj Jain, Adv. & Ms. Tejasvi Jain & Ms. Somya Jain, Ca Respondent By Shri G.C.Srivastava, Adv., Shri Kalrav Mehrotra, Adv. & Shri Mayank Patawari, Ca Date Of Hearing 11.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 09.02.2023

Showing 1–20 of 171 · Page 1 of 9

...
28
Section 26321
Section 80I20
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 43Section 43B

house scientific research amounting to Rs.246,65,438,122/-. However, the AO did not make any addition on this issue in pursuance of the directions of the Ld. DRP. The AO further noticed that the assessee had made payment of Royalty amounting to Rs. 1035,49,95,272/- to Suzuki Motor Corporation (“SMC”) in the year under consideration

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1507/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2010-11] Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Vs Dcit, Plot No.1, Nelson Mandela Road, Circle-16(1), Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. New Delhi. Pan-Aaacm0829Q Appellant Respondent [Assessment Year : 2010-11] Dcit, Vs Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Circle-16(1), Plot No.1, Nelson Mandela Road, New Delhi. Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. Pan-Aaacm0829Q Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr.Adv., Shri Neeraj Jain, Adv. & Ms. Tejasvi Jain & Ms. Somya Jain, Ca Respondent By Shri G.C.Srivastava, Adv., Shri Kalrav Mehrotra, Adv. & Shri Mayank Patawari, Ca Date Of Hearing 11.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 09.02.2023

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 43Section 43B

house scientific research amounting to Rs.246,65,438,122/-. However, the AO did not make any addition on this issue in pursuance of the directions of the Ld. DRP. The AO further noticed that the assessee had made payment of Royalty amounting to Rs. 1035,49,95,272/- to Suzuki Motor Corporation (“SMC”) in the year under consideration

MANOJ MITTAL,DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 4596/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Sh. C.S.Anand, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR
Section 2(22)(e)Section 50Section 50CSection 69

House Property”, in the hands of assessee in respect of these properties. However, the Ld. CIT(A) took the view that the assessee was to be treated as owner of the properties u/s 269 UA of Income Tax Act as the assessee had entered into the lease agreement with Sh. N.M. Mittal for a period of 30 years in respect

M/S. VIKON ENGINEERING PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3345/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. G. S. Pannu & Ms Suchitra Kamblei.T.A. No. 3345/Del/2015 (A.Y 2010-11) Vikon Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Vs Acit, 31, First Floor, Sunder Nagar, Centre Circle – 5, New Delhi. New Delhi (Pan : Aabcv 7701 K) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 40Section 43B

house property and Section 43B is applicable to income from business and not applicable to that of income from house

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SIGMA INFORMATION SYSTEM,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5232/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Apr 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.P. Jainassessment Year 2013-14 Ito, Ward-30(1), Vs. Sigma Information New Delhi System, Pan: Abefs 3498M Shed 1 & 2, Opposite Radio Mirchi, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase- Iv, New Delhi. Pan: Abefs 3498M (Assessee) (Respondent) Revenue By : Ms. Bedobani Chaudhuri, Sr.D.R. Assessee(S) By : Shri Rahul Khare, Adv.

For Respondent: Ms. Bedobani Chaudhuri
Section 24Section 43BSection 43E

house property and allow deduction u/s 24(a) and 24(b) of the IT Act, 1961 as claimed by the assessee whereas the Assessing Officer has assessed the income of the assessee as Income from Business on the basis of the business of renting of properties of the assessee and Auditor's Report" 2. "On the facts

ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-3, NEW DELHI vs. DELHI TOURISM TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal filed by the Department in ITA No

ITA 4100/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

Section 43B

section 43B in CIT Vs. Shri Ram Honda Power Equipment Corporation. As a result of the above discussion, the first question is answered in favour of the assessee, and against the revenue;” Therefore, following the above conclusion as drawn by Hon’ble High Court, which is fully applicable to the facts of the case in hand, therefore, order of learned

DELHI TOURISM & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-10(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal filed by the Department in ITA No

ITA 5509/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

Section 43B

section 43B in CIT Vs. Shri Ram Honda Power Equipment Corporation. As a result of the above discussion, the first question is answered in favour of the assessee, and against the revenue;” Therefore, following the above conclusion as drawn by Hon’ble High Court, which is fully applicable to the facts of the case in hand, therefore, order of learned

DELHI TOURISM TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-3, NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal filed by the Department in ITA No

ITA 5167/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

Section 43B

section 43B in CIT Vs. Shri Ram Honda Power Equipment Corporation. As a result of the above discussion, the first question is answered in favour of the assessee, and against the revenue;” Therefore, following the above conclusion as drawn by Hon’ble High Court, which is fully applicable to the facts of the case in hand, therefore, order of learned

ADDI. CIT SPL. RANGE-3, NEW DELHI vs. DELHI TOURISM & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. , NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal filed by the Department in ITA No

ITA 5920/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

Section 43B

section 43B in CIT Vs. Shri Ram Honda Power Equipment Corporation. As a result of the above discussion, the first question is answered in favour of the assessee, and against the revenue;” Therefore, following the above conclusion as drawn by Hon’ble High Court, which is fully applicable to the facts of the case in hand, therefore, order of learned

ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-3, NEW DELHI vs. DELHI TOURISM TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal filed by the Department in ITA No

ITA 184/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

Section 43B

section 43B in CIT Vs. Shri Ram Honda Power Equipment Corporation. As a result of the above discussion, the first question is answered in favour of the assessee, and against the revenue;” Therefore, following the above conclusion as drawn by Hon’ble High Court, which is fully applicable to the facts of the case in hand, therefore, order of learned

ADDL.CIT, SPECIAL RANGE-3, NEW DELHI vs. DELHI TOURISM TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal filed by the Department in ITA No

ITA 4737/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

Section 43B

section 43B in CIT Vs. Shri Ram Honda Power Equipment Corporation. As a result of the above discussion, the first question is answered in favour of the assessee, and against the revenue;” Therefore, following the above conclusion as drawn by Hon’ble High Court, which is fully applicable to the facts of the case in hand, therefore, order of learned

ACIT SPECIAL RANGE-3, NEW DELHI vs. DELHI TOURISM & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal filed by the Department in ITA No

ITA 5922/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member)

Section 43B

section 43B in CIT Vs. Shri Ram Honda Power Equipment Corporation. As a result of the above discussion, the first question is answered in favour of the assessee, and against the revenue;” Therefore, following the above conclusion as drawn by Hon’ble High Court, which is fully applicable to the facts of the case in hand, therefore, order of learned

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. AJAY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Appeal is dismissed and appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 5776/DEL/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: S/Shri Pradeep Dinodia & R.KFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 143(3)Section 41(1)

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008 was @ 12.5% as witnessed from paper book pages 233 to 236 which went up to 15.75 to 16% in the financial year 2008-09 relevant to A. Y. 2009-10 (paper book pages 237 to 240). The assessee while determining the discount of 24% on this count took

AJAY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

Appeal is dismissed and appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1704/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: S/Shri Pradeep Dinodia & R.KFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 143(3)Section 41(1)

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008 was @ 12.5% as witnessed from paper book pages 233 to 236 which went up to 15.75 to 16% in the financial year 2008-09 relevant to A. Y. 2009-10 (paper book pages 237 to 240). The assessee while determining the discount of 24% on this count took

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S AJAY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

Appeal is dismissed and appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1349/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: S/Shri Pradeep Dinodia & R.KFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 143(3)Section 41(1)

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008 was @ 12.5% as witnessed from paper book pages 233 to 236 which went up to 15.75 to 16% in the financial year 2008-09 relevant to A. Y. 2009-10 (paper book pages 237 to 240). The assessee while determining the discount of 24% on this count took

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S AJAY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Appeal is dismissed and appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 2083/DEL/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jul 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: S/Shri Pradeep Dinodia & R.KFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 143(3)Section 41(1)

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008 was @ 12.5% as witnessed from paper book pages 233 to 236 which went up to 15.75 to 16% in the financial year 2008-09 relevant to A. Y. 2009-10 (paper book pages 237 to 240). The assessee while determining the discount of 24% on this count took

ACIT, CIRCLE-18(2), NOIDA vs. NOIDA TOLL BRIDGE CO. LTD., NOIDA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4968/DEL/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Aug 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri G.C. Srivastava, Adv
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

House of Lords held that on the true construction of the Agreements, the commissions in question were earned by the assessee in the year in which the policies were underwritten, and must be brought into account accordingly and confirmed the decision of the Court of Appeal. It may be noted that the charge was on profits arising in each chargeable

ACIT, CIRCLE-18(2), NOIDA vs. NOIDA TOLL BRIDGE CO. LTD., NOIDA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4971/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri G.C. Srivastava, Adv
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

House of Lords held that on the true construction of the Agreements, the commissions in question were earned by the assessee in the year in which the policies were underwritten, and must be brought into account accordingly and confirmed the decision of the Court of Appeal. It may be noted that the charge was on profits arising in each chargeable

ACIT, CIRCLE-18(2), NOIDA vs. NOIDA TOLL BRIDGE CO. LTD., NOIDA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4972/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri G.C. Srivastava, Adv
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

House of Lords held that on the true construction of the Agreements, the commissions in question were earned by the assessee in the year in which the policies were underwritten, and must be brought into account accordingly and confirmed the decision of the Court of Appeal. It may be noted that the charge was on profits arising in each chargeable