BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “house property”+ Section 24Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur16Delhi12Mumbai11Chennai8Bangalore5Indore3Kolkata2Chandigarh2

Key Topics

Section 14716Section 13211Section 143(3)9Section 29A8Section 688Section 13A8Unexplained Cash Credit8Reassessment8Search & Seizure8

SHIVANI MADAN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, NEW DELHI

In the result, the both the appeals of assessee are dismissed

ITA 498/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sahil Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Amitabh Kumar Sinha, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 153ASection 22Section 23(1)(a)Section 24a

section 23(1)(a) of the Act. Since the assessee did not provide any expected reasonable rent of the property, he assessed the annual letting value at 8% of the cost of property as shown in the sale deed and computed income from house property as under: Value of property as per details submitted by the assessee

Section 153A5
Section 224
Deduction4

SHIVANI MADAN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, NEW DELHI

In the result, the both the appeals of assessee are dismissed

ITA 657/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Aug 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sahil Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Amitabh Kumar Sinha, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 153ASection 22Section 23(1)(a)Section 24a

section 23(1)(a) of the Act. Since the assessee did not provide any expected reasonable rent of the property, he assessed the annual letting value at 8% of the cost of property as shown in the sale deed and computed income from house property as under: Value of property as per details submitted by the assessee

SHIVANI MADAN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-05, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1642/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Sahil Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri H.K. Choudhary,CIT-DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 22Section 23Section 23(1)(a)Section 24aSection 250

section 23(1)(a) of the Act. Since the assessee did not provide any expected reasonable rent of the property, he assessed the annual letting value at 8% of the cost of property as shown in the sale deed and computed income from house property as under: 2 Value of property as per details submitted by the assessee

ABHAY KUMAR MITTAL (INDL),NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-72(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3385/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. A. D. Jain, Vice-Dr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3385/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Abhay Kumar Mittal, Vs Dcit, Flat No. A-42, Himalayan Circle-72(1), Residency, Plot No. 10, Sector- New Delhi 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aajpm3747K Assessee By : Sh. Rajesh Mahana, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.12.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 08.02.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Rajesh Mahana, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 24ASection 27Section 64

Section 27 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 6. That the CIT (A), further misconceived the provisions of the Act, to state that accommodation can’t be shared if one claims that he or she is paying rent. There must be complete house or a part of house with clear demarcated portion in which the one is staying in rent

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 31, DELHI

ITA 2985/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT
Section 132Section 13ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 29ASection 68

24A (Contribution Report) under Rule 85B of Conduct of Elections Rule, 1961, before the due date for furnishing the IT return of that financial year under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the Election Commission. The form calls for details like name, PAN, amount donated, mode of donations etc., of all the donors donating amounts more than

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 31, DELHI

ITA 2966/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT
Section 132Section 13ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 29ASection 68

24A (Contribution Report) under Rule 85B of Conduct of Elections Rule, 1961, before the due date for furnishing the IT return of that financial year under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the Election Commission. The form calls for details like name, PAN, amount donated, mode of donations etc., of all the donors donating amounts more than

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, DELHI

ITA 2812/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT
Section 132Section 13ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 29ASection 68

24A (Contribution Report) under Rule 85B of Conduct of Elections Rule, 1961, before the due date for furnishing the IT return of that financial year under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the Election Commission. The form calls for details like name, PAN, amount donated, mode of donations etc., of all the donors donating amounts more than

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, DELHI

ITA 2813/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT
Section 132Section 13ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 29ASection 68

24A (Contribution Report) under Rule 85B of Conduct of Elections Rule, 1961, before the due date for furnishing the IT return of that financial year under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the Election Commission. The form calls for details like name, PAN, amount donated, mode of donations etc., of all the donors donating amounts more than

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, DELHI

ITA 2761/DEL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT
Section 132Section 13ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 29ASection 68

24A (Contribution Report) under Rule 85B of Conduct of Elections Rule, 1961, before the due date for furnishing the IT return of that financial year under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the Election Commission. The form calls for details like name, PAN, amount donated, mode of donations etc., of all the donors donating amounts more than

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-31, DELHI

ITA 2982/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT
Section 132Section 13ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 29ASection 68

24A (Contribution Report) under Rule 85B of Conduct of Elections Rule, 1961, before the due date for furnishing the IT return of that financial year under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the Election Commission. The form calls for details like name, PAN, amount donated, mode of donations etc., of all the donors donating amounts more than

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-31, DELHI

ITA 2984/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT
Section 132Section 13ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 29ASection 68

24A (Contribution Report) under Rule 85B of Conduct of Elections Rule, 1961, before the due date for furnishing the IT return of that financial year under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the Election Commission. The form calls for details like name, PAN, amount donated, mode of donations etc., of all the donors donating amounts more than

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 31, DELHI

ITA 2983/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Sh. Mohan Lal Sharma, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT
Section 132Section 13ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 29ASection 68

24A (Contribution Report) under Rule 85B of Conduct of Elections Rule, 1961, before the due date for furnishing the IT return of that financial year under section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the Election Commission. The form calls for details like name, PAN, amount donated, mode of donations etc., of all the donors donating amounts more than