ABHAY KUMAR MITTAL (INDL),NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-72(1), NEW DELHI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 3385/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Feb 2022AY 2013-14
Bench: Sh. A. D. Jain, Vice-Dr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3385/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Abhay Kumar Mittal, Vs Dcit, Flat No. A-42, Himalayan Circle-72(1), Residency, Plot No. 10, Sector- New Delhi 22, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aajpm3747K Assessee By : Sh. Rajesh Mahana, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.12.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 08.02.2022
For Appellant: Sh. Rajesh Mahana, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 24ASection 27Section 64
Section 27 of the Income Tax Act,
1961. 6. That the CIT (A), further misconceived the provisions of the Act, to state that accommodation can’t be shared if one claims that he or she is paying rent. There must be complete house or a part of house with clear demarcated portion in which the one is staying in rent