BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

64 results for “house property”+ Section 194C(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi64Mumbai60Bangalore26Raipur19Ahmedabad16Jaipur9Hyderabad9Cuttack7Rajkot6Chennai6Lucknow5Indore5Surat3Kolkata3Nagpur3Pune3SC2Patna1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 14A38Deduction37Addition to Income30Section 143(3)28TDS26Section 194C25Section 194I21Disallowance18Section 26315Section 201(1)

GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GURGAON, GURGAON

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are remanded back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment

ITA 1053/DEL/2021[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Amit Shuklaas S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 147Section 250Section 4(5)

house property, as amount received by AOP is for maintenance charges and common charges which is further paid by AOP for common expenses and is not chargeable on the basis of concept of mutuality. Page 5 of 10 6. That the assessment order is void and invalid in law as Assessing Officer not take effect of Tax deducted at source

GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GURGAON, GURGAON

Showing 1–20 of 64 · Page 1 of 4

13
Section 19413
Transfer Pricing11

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are remanded back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment

ITA 1052/DEL/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amit Shuklaas S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 147Section 250Section 4(5)

house property, as amount received by AOP is for maintenance charges and common charges which is further paid by AOP for common expenses and is not chargeable on the basis of concept of mutuality. Page 5 of 10 6. That the assessment order is void and invalid in law as Assessing Officer not take effect of Tax deducted at source

GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(5), GURGAON, GURUGRAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are remanded back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment

ITA 1038/DEL/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shuklaas S.M.C. (Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, Sr.DR
Section 147Section 250Section 4(5)

house property, as amount received by AOP is for maintenance charges and common charges which is further paid by AOP for common expenses and is not chargeable on the basis of concept of mutuality. Page 5 of 10 6. That the assessment order is void and invalid in law as Assessing Officer not take effect of Tax deducted at source

MUKUL ROHATGI,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2427/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Manish Agarwal

For Respondent: Shri Sachit Jolly, Senior Advocate
Section 112ASection 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 24Section 263

7. Coming to the first property at London i.e., Apartment No.8 in Hepworth Court 30 at Gatlif Road, London, the PCIT notes in his order that this property was not shown in the ‘AL Schedule' and also no ALV (Annual Letting Value) from this property was disclosed by the assessee. According to PCIT, even the assessee has not mentioned that

BSC C&C JOINT VENTURE,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-61(1),, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2283/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M Balaganesh & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Tarandeep Singh, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 801A(4)(i)Section 80I

7. Muzzafarpur ROB Ircon Construction of Road over 1,14,58,821 International Bridge both railway span Ltd. and adjacent approaches span including reinforced earth wall/retaining wall 8. Soanbarsa NHAI Augmenting the existing 68,95,11,290 (Through road from km 2.8 to km 89 Project on Muzaffarpur- Sonbarsa Company Section of National North Bihar Highway

BSC C&C JOINT VENTURE,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-61(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2284/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Feb 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI G.S. PANNU (Vice President), SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Tarandeep Singh, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Vivek Kumar Upadhyay, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 40Section 801A(4)(i)Section 80I

7. Muzzafarpur ROB Ircon Construction of 1,14,58,821 International Road over Bridge Ltd. both railway span and adjacent approaches span including reinforced earth wall/retaining wall 8. Soanbarsa NHAI Augmenting the 68,95,11,290 (Through existing road from Project km 2.8 to km 89 Company on Muzaffarpur- North Bihar Sonbarsa Section Highway Ltd. of National Highway

GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), GURGAON, GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1054/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg[Assessment Year : 2014-15] Galleria Condominium Vs Ito, Association, Galleria Building, Ward-1(3), Dlf Phase Iv, Dlf City, Gurgaon. Gurgaon, Haryana-122002. Pan-Aaaag3018P Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Rishabh Aggarwal, Ca & Ms. Jaishree, Ca Respondent By Shri Mithalesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 13.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 19.09.2022

Section 140Section 147Section 194Section 80P(2)(d)

section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. As interest income is disbursed to members who had contributed to it. 4. Further as per verdict of Bangalore Club v/s Commissioner of Income Tax, Interest income is not taxable as concept of mutuality has been extended to define groups of people who contribute to a common fund, controlled

RBS BUSINESS SERVICES P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) 1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 3081/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3081/Mum./2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 3082/Mum./2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Rbs Business Services Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit(Tds)-1(1), (Formerly Known As Abn Amro Mumbai-400002 Central Enterprises Service Pvt. Ltd.), Empire Complex, 414, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400013 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadca1780D Assessee By : Sh. S. K. Agarwal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. T. Kipgen, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 12.08.2022

For Appellant: Sh. S. K. Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. T. Kipgen, CIT DR
Section 192Section 194CSection 194JSection 28Section 44ASection 9

housing accommodation or for the purpose of planning, development or improvement of cities, towns and villages, or for both; or (g) any society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any law corresponding to that Act in force in any part of India; or (h) any trust; or (i) any university established or incorporated

RBS BUSINESS SERVICES P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) 1(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 3082/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 3081/Mum./2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Ita No. 3082/Mum./2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Rbs Business Services Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit(Tds)-1(1), (Formerly Known As Abn Amro Mumbai-400002 Central Enterprises Service Pvt. Ltd.), Empire Complex, 414, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400013 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadca1780D Assessee By : Sh. S. K. Agarwal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. T. Kipgen, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 12.08.2022

For Appellant: Sh. S. K. Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. T. Kipgen, CIT DR
Section 192Section 194CSection 194JSection 28Section 44ASection 9

housing accommodation or for the purpose of planning, development or improvement of cities, towns and villages, or for both; or (g) any society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any law corresponding to that Act in force in any part of India; or (h) any trust; or (i) any university established or incorporated

SHREE BALKRISHNA COMMERCIAL CO. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. PCIT-I, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1168/KOL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri O. P. Kant & Ms. Suchitra Kambleasstt. Year 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Subhash Singhal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sujeet Kumar, CIT, DR
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263

property is independent to letting out of DG, AC, Glow Sign and maintenance services. There are separate registered agreements for them. The tenant had option to avail these facilities or not and in actual some tenants did not availed them. Separate staff for security and / or maintenance is kept, electricity expenses are incurred and lot of other activities are involved

JHONSON WATCH COMPANY PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE- 75(1), NEW DELHI

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1738/DEL/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Anubhav Sharmam/S. Johnson Watch Company Vs. Acit Pvt. Ltd. Circle 75(1), L-21, Connaught Place, New Delhi New Delhi Appellant Respondent Pan: Aabcj9807G

Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)

house property. In the case before hand, the CAM charges are paid by the lessor and the appellant has no control on actual expenditure to be incurred by the lessor. In view of above mentioned factual and legal position, thus it is clear that the CAM charges paid by the appellant are part of rent liable

DCIT, CIRCLE-5(2), NEW DELHI vs. CAPARO POWER LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6401/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Aug 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharatdr. B. R. R. Kumar(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Nidhi Srivastava, CIT DR
Section 139Section 194Section 194CSection 194HSection 194ISection 194JSection 194LSection 2Section 201Section 203A

House, 21, K.G. Marg, New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AADCB8619C Assessee by : Sh. Ved Jain, CA Revenue by : Ms. Nidhi Srivastava, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 24.08.2021 Date of Pronouncement: 24.08.2021 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the revenue against the order of ld. CIT(A)-2, New Delhi

PVR LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-76(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 7290/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. G. C. Srivastava, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjay Nargas, Sr. DR
Section 194Section 194CSection 194ISection 201

7% of revenue share on net sales as monthly rent and also pay @Rs.12/- per sq. ft. for maintenance services. 4. The assessee has also submitted sample invoice for payment of CAM charges as entered into an agreement for common area maintenance with GVK Properties & Management Company Pvt. Ltd. for maintenance of the area at Rs.22

PVR LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-76(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 202/DEL/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. G. C. Srivastava, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjay Nargas, Sr. DR
Section 194Section 194CSection 194ISection 201

7% of revenue share on net sales as monthly rent and also pay @Rs.12/- per sq. ft. for maintenance services. 4. The assessee has also submitted sample invoice for payment of CAM charges as entered into an agreement for common area maintenance with GVK Properties & Management Company Pvt. Ltd. for maintenance of the area at Rs.22

DCIT CIRCLE-76(1), NEW DELHI vs. OMAXE LTD. , NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue/Department stands

ITA 9282/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry[Assessment Year: 2015-16]

Section 194CSection 250Section 271C

7, Local Shopping Centre, Near Post Office, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019. PAN/TAN:AAACO0171H/DE LO01861G APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee represented by: Sh. Yuvraj Singh, Adv. Department represented by: Sh. Jitender Chand, Sr. DR Date of hearing 05.01.2023 Date of pronouncement 30 .01.2023 O R D E R PER N.K.CHOUDHRY, JM: The Revenue/Department has preferred the instant appeal against the order dated

TCNS CLOTHING CO. LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (TDS) CIRCLE - 76(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1995/DEL/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.1994 & 1995/Del/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years:2011-12 & 2012-13 बनाम Tcns Clothing Co. Limited, Acit (Tds), 119, W-House, New Vs. Circle-76(1), Manglapuri, Aaykar Bhawan, Mandi Road, Sultanpur, District Centre, Mehrauli, New Delhi. Laxmi Nagar, Delhi. Pan No. Aaact4432E अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194ISection 201(1)

House, New Vs. Circle-76(1), Manglapuri, Aaykar Bhawan, Mandi Road, Sultanpur, District Centre, Mehrauli, New Delhi. Laxmi Nagar, Delhi. PAN No. AAACT4432E अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee by Shri Vishal Kalra, Adv. Shri Ankit Saini, Adv. Revenue by Shri Pramod Kumar, Sr. DR सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date of hearing: 19.05.2023 31.05.2023 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement on आदेश

TCNS CLOTHING CO. LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (TDS) CIRCLE - 76(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1994/DEL/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A Nos.1994 & 1995/Del/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years:2011-12 & 2012-13 बनाम Tcns Clothing Co. Limited, Acit (Tds), 119, W-House, New Vs. Circle-76(1), Manglapuri, Aaykar Bhawan, Mandi Road, Sultanpur, District Centre, Mehrauli, New Delhi. Laxmi Nagar, Delhi. Pan No. Aaact4432E अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194ISection 201(1)

House, New Vs. Circle-76(1), Manglapuri, Aaykar Bhawan, Mandi Road, Sultanpur, District Centre, Mehrauli, New Delhi. Laxmi Nagar, Delhi. PAN No. AAACT4432E अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee by Shri Vishal Kalra, Adv. Shri Ankit Saini, Adv. Revenue by Shri Pramod Kumar, Sr. DR सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date of hearing: 19.05.2023 31.05.2023 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement on आदेश

DCIT, CIRCLE-73(1), DELHI vs. CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5588/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: BEFORESHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA (Accountant Member)

Section 194Section 201(1)

house, to its ultimate parent company, Canon Inc., Japan. 5.2 Further, AO in his order u/s 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 observed and contended as below: - a) The details of transactions on account of various Rent payments and Common area maintenance charges are placed on record as received physically or digitally from the Assessee

GOPAL GLOBAL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, TDS WARD 74(3)

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2664/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri M.R. Sahu, CAFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Kumar Upadhyay, Sr.DR
Section 194CSection 2Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 3(3)(ii)

property from HUDA but however has paid enhanced EDC of Rs.40 Lakh on account of Group Housing being constructed on land at Ballabhgarh. There is no TDS liability on statutory payments made to Government of Haryana, Town and Country Planning Department is part of Government of Haryana. HUDA is only authorized to accept payment on behalf of Town and Country

ITO, WARD-77(3), NEW DELHI vs. SILVERGLADES INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD., GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 677/DEL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri R.S. Singhvi, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Anuj Garg, Sr.DR
Section 194CSection 2Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 3(3)(ii)

property from HUDA but however has paid enhanced EDC of Rs.4,58,39,589/- on account of Group Housing being constructed on land at Hayatpur, Sector-88, Gurgaon. There is no TDS liability on statutory payments made to Government of Haryana, Town and Country Planning Department is part of Government of Haryana. HUDA is only authorized to accept payment