ACIT, CIRCLE CC 15, NEW DELHI vs. ALKA MENDIRATTA , DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the Cross Objections of the assessees are also dismissed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarms. Astha Chandra

house property purchased by the Appellant during the above assessment year jointly with his spouse. Here it is pertinent to refer to the observations of Hon'ble Justice P.N. Bhagwati while rendering the judgment in the case of Distributors (Baroda) P Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Otrs., reported in 155 ITR 120 (SC) - larger bench decision as under

ANJU CHAWLA,DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. R.K. Panda & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2010-11

house property, capital gain and income from other sources. A search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act 1961 alongwith survey operations u/s 133 A of the Income Tax Act 1961 were undertaken at various residential and business premises of Aseem kumar Gupta & Group and other beneficiary group of cases on 26.03.2010. Shri Aseem Kumar Gupta

M/S. A K CAPITAL MARKETS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Sh. N. K. Sainiita No. 6859/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 A. K. Capital Markets Ltd., Vs Dcit, Central Circle-2, 609, 6Th Floor, Antriksh Bhawan, 22, New Delhi Kasturba Gandhi Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadca9960D Assessee By : Sh. Ved Jain, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Sarabhjit Singh, Dr Date Of Hearing : 16.09.2015 Date Of Pronouncement : 04.12.2015 Order

133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in the case of M/s A.K. Capital Services Ltd., its group companies, directors of such companies and their relatives on 26.04.2007, the assessee belonged to the said group. During the course of above said operations, substantial documents were seized and impounded. The assessee filed the return

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI vs. MANI KAKKAR

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR

Section 133A of the Act in the premises of M/s. Ravinder Properties of Andheria Mor, New Delhi. A sworn statement was recorded from Ravinder Sharma, the proprietor of Ravinder Properties, in which he had “graphically described” that Rjender Gupta had negotiated the sale of KG Farms for `3.10 crores to one Darshan Kumar Khosla and that the document was registered

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NITIN KEDAR NATH GUPTA

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR

Section 133A of the Act in the premises of M/s. Ravinder Properties of Andheria Mor, New Delhi. A sworn statement was recorded from Ravinder Sharma, the proprietor of Ravinder Properties, in which he had “graphically described” that Rjender Gupta had negotiated the sale of KG Farms for `3.10 crores to one Darshan Kumar Khosla and that the document was registered

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. ROHIT KEDAR NATH GUPTA

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR

Section 133A of the Act in the premises of M/s. Ravinder Properties of Andheria Mor, New Delhi. A sworn statement was recorded from Ravinder Sharma, the proprietor of Ravinder Properties, in which he had “graphically described” that Rjender Gupta had negotiated the sale of KG Farms for `3.10 crores to one Darshan Kumar Khosla and that the document was registered

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. ASHA KEDAR NATH GUPTA

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR

Section 133A of the Act in the premises of M/s. Ravinder Properties of Andheria Mor, New Delhi. A sworn statement was recorded from Ravinder Sharma, the proprietor of Ravinder Properties, in which he had “graphically described” that Rjender Gupta had negotiated the sale of KG Farms for `3.10 crores to one Darshan Kumar Khosla and that the document was registered

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. KEDAR NATH GUPTA

Section 133A of the Act in the premises of M/s. Ravinder Properties of Andheria Mor, New Delhi. A sworn statement was recorded from Ravinder Sharma, the proprietor of Ravinder Properties, in which he had “graphically described” that Rjender Gupta had negotiated the sale of KG Farms for `3.10 crores to one Darshan Kumar Khosla and that the document was registered

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Section 133A of the Act in the premises of M/s. Ravinder Properties of Andheria Mor, New Delhi. A sworn statement was recorded from Ravinder Sharma, the proprietor of Ravinder Properties, in which he had “graphically described” that Rjender Gupta had negotiated the sale of KG Farms for `3.10 crores to one Darshan Kumar Khosla and that the document was registered

RAJ KUMAR CHAWLA,DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahuvs Raj Kumar Chawla Acit A-7, Nirman Vihar, Central Circle-Ix Delhi. New Delhi. Aalpc1209J Appellant Respondent

house property Rs. 4,36,036/-; 2. Addition on account of un-explained loan of Rs. 2,29,73,630/-; 3. Addition on account of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) on protective basis Rs. 46,588/-. 3. The assessee challenged the above additions before the Ld. CIT(A) and raised various grounds of appeal. The assessee also filed application

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. RAKESH KUMAR GARG, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri N.K. Billaiya

property as per section 50C of the I.T. Act and not as per the share purchase agreement. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) erred in not taking into consideration the findings of the AO that the assessee adopted the modus operandi to transfer of shares of a company having only asset of land

DLF LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Prashant Maharishi

133A of the Act at the company’s premises at P-39 (Basement), NDSE, Part II, New Delhi and certain documents were found. On 30.06.2008, CIT (A), Delhi IV granted approval of conducting the special audit of books of accounts of the assesse for this year. In accordance with that, a special auditor was appointed for conducting the special audit

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S DLF LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Prashant Maharishi

133A of the Act at the company’s premises at P-39 (Basement), NDSE, Part II, New Delhi and certain documents were found. On 30.06.2008, CIT (A), Delhi IV granted approval of conducting the special audit of books of accounts of the assesse for this year. In accordance with that, a special auditor was appointed for conducting the special audit

SH. GURMEET SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 5559/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2006-07 Ita No. 5560/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2007-08 Ita No. 5561/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5562/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5563/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 5564/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 5565/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Gurmeet Singh, Vs Dcit, C-168, Anand Vihar, Central Circle-20, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Ita No. 5756/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5757/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5758/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Acit, Vs Gurmeet Singh, Central Circle-8, C-168, Anand Vihar, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110092 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Assessee By : Sh. Gurdev Singh Chawla, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Paresh Johri, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 09.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.03.2023

house and purchase of 16 plots were found. Even in the post search inquiries none of the 17 properties could be traced out. There was no evidence in any of the bank statement with regard to the dealings. The inferences drawn were not backed by any tangible evidences or corroborative evidences. The revenue failed to establish the person to whom

SH. GURMEET SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 5559/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2006-07 Ita No. 5560/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2007-08 Ita No. 5561/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5562/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5563/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 5564/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 5565/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Gurmeet Singh, Vs Dcit, C-168, Anand Vihar, Central Circle-20, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Ita No. 5756/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5757/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5758/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Acit, Vs Gurmeet Singh, Central Circle-8, C-168, Anand Vihar, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110092 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Assessee By : Sh. Gurdev Singh Chawla, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Paresh Johri, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 09.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.03.2023

house and purchase of 16 plots were found. Even in the post search inquiries none of the 17 properties could be traced out. There was no evidence in any of the bank statement with regard to the dealings. The inferences drawn were not backed by any tangible evidences or corroborative evidences. The revenue failed to establish the person to whom

SH. GURMEET SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 5559/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2006-07 Ita No. 5560/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2007-08 Ita No. 5561/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5562/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5563/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 5564/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 5565/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Gurmeet Singh, Vs Dcit, C-168, Anand Vihar, Central Circle-20, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Ita No. 5756/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5757/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5758/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Acit, Vs Gurmeet Singh, Central Circle-8, C-168, Anand Vihar, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110092 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Assessee By : Sh. Gurdev Singh Chawla, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Paresh Johri, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 09.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.03.2023

house and purchase of 16 plots were found. Even in the post search inquiries none of the 17 properties could be traced out. There was no evidence in any of the bank statement with regard to the dealings. The inferences drawn were not backed by any tangible evidences or corroborative evidences. The revenue failed to establish the person to whom

SH. GURMEET SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 5559/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2006-07 Ita No. 5560/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2007-08 Ita No. 5561/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5562/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5563/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 5564/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 5565/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Gurmeet Singh, Vs Dcit, C-168, Anand Vihar, Central Circle-20, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Ita No. 5756/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5757/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5758/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Acit, Vs Gurmeet Singh, Central Circle-8, C-168, Anand Vihar, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110092 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Assessee By : Sh. Gurdev Singh Chawla, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Paresh Johri, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 09.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.03.2023

house and purchase of 16 plots were found. Even in the post search inquiries none of the 17 properties could be traced out. There was no evidence in any of the bank statement with regard to the dealings. The inferences drawn were not backed by any tangible evidences or corroborative evidences. The revenue failed to establish the person to whom

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. SH. GURMEET SINGH, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Sh. C. M. Gargdr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 5559/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2006-07 Ita No. 5560/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2007-08 Ita No. 5561/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5562/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5563/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Ita No. 5564/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Ita No. 5565/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Gurmeet Singh, Vs Dcit, C-168, Anand Vihar, Central Circle-20, New Delhi-110092 New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Ita No. 5756/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2008-09 Ita No. 5757/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2009-10 Ita No. 5758/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2010-11 Acit, Vs Gurmeet Singh, Central Circle-8, C-168, Anand Vihar, New Delhi-110002 New Delhi-110092 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaqps9561E Assessee By : Sh. Gurdev Singh Chawla, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Paresh Johri, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 09.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.03.2023

house and purchase of 16 plots were found. Even in the post search inquiries none of the 17 properties could be traced out. There was no evidence in any of the bank statement with regard to the dealings. The inferences drawn were not backed by any tangible evidences or corroborative evidences. The revenue failed to establish the person to whom