DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri H. S. Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishinew Delhi Television Ltd, Vs. Acit, 207, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase- Circle-13(1), Iii, New Delhi New Delhi Pan: Aaacn0865D (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Vs. New Delhi Television Ltd, Circle-13(1), 207, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi Phase-Iii, New Delhi Pan: Aaacn0865D (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 288B of the Income Tax Act'1961. Copies of Form 15CA/CB issued by an independent chartered accountant were also placed before you. We respectfully submit that there should not be any disallowance on account of non-deduction of TDS/withholding taxes from the payments made to Intelsat Corporation, we are giving below a brief note on the same: During

MITSUI KINZOKU COMPONENTS PVT LTD,REWARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ITO WARD TWO

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

87A - Held, yes - Whether since last day to file a belated return in terms of section 139(4) was 31- 12-2024, CBDT was to be directed to issue requisite notification under section 119 and extend due date for e-filing of income-tax returns in relation to assessees who were required to file a return of income

MITSUI KINZOKU COMPONENTS INDIA PVT LTD,REWARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ITO WARD TWO

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

87A - Held, yes - Whether since last day to file a belated return in terms of section 139(4) was 31- 12-2024, CBDT was to be directed to issue requisite notification under section 119 and extend due date for e-filing of income-tax returns in relation to assessees who were required to file a return of income

MITSUI KINZOKU COMPONENTS PVT LTD,REWARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ITO WARD TWO

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

87A - Held, yes - Whether since last day to file a belated return in terms of section 139(4) was 31- 12-2024, CBDT was to be directed to issue requisite notification under section 119 and extend due date for e-filing of income-tax returns in relation to assessees who were required to file a return of income

RAJIV KUMAR KATARIA,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-12, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishi

87A, Shri Aurobindo Marg, Income Tax, Circle-12, New Delhi. New Delhi. TAN/PAN: AARPK 0106A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: S/Shri Salil Agarwal, Adv. & Shailendra Gupta, Adv. Respondent by: Shri Surender Pal, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing: 18 07 2019 Date of pronouncement: 26 07 2019 O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, JM: The aforesaid appeal has been filed